Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update lift-shift-to-containers.md #1998

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ When validating if the application to be containerized works on Windows containe
|---|---|---|---|
|.NET Framework versions 2.X and 3.X|.NET Framework 4.x|.NET Framework 3.5|Windows Server Core|
|.NET Framework 4.x versions|.NET Framework 4.x|Build your .NET Framework container image with Server or Windows images|Windows Server Core|
|.NET 6 or 7|.NET 6 or 7 respectively|Build your .NET container image with Windows or Server base images|Windows Nano Server or Server Core|
|.NET 6 or later|Matching .NET container image, for example .NET 9 for .NET 9|Build your .NET container image with Windows or Server base images|Windows Nano Server or Server Core|
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for example .NET 9 for .NET 9

That phrasing doesn't pop for me. As a user, I'm not quite sure how I'd apply ".NET 9" to containers. Perhaps "9.0" is closer?

I'm not sure this whole table makes much sense. For example, recommending .NET Framework 4.x images for a 2.x/3.x app won't work. That will launch FOD on Windows client, right?


### Other supporting components

Expand Down