-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Annotation fails randomly with structural variants coming from Manta #1800
Comments
Hi @fperezcobos, |
Hi @olaaustine, And here you can find more files, including gtf and gff: Thank you for the quick reply :) |
Hi @fperezcobos, |
Hi @olaaustine, |
Hi @fperezcobos,
It is an issue with the annotation source being used. |
Hi @olaaustine, In this case, I refer to other variants. If you check the input vcf, there are 48 variants. While running VEP, there are 18 warnings so in the vep output should be 30 variants annotated, but if you check, there are only 14 variants annotated. Sixteen variants are not annotated and there was no warning. I'm reporting that behaviour in this issue. I hope I could make myself clear and explain properly the issue. Thank you for your time :) |
Hi @fperezcobos, |
Describe the issue
I'm annotating a vcf coming from Manta. In the output, some of the variants are not annotated and I don't know why. In my vcf, all the variants have all fields information (including alternative allele). Also, there is no warning explaining why they are not annotated.
Additional information
Please fill in the following sections to help us find the source of your issue as quickly as possible.
System
Full VEP command line
Full error message
No warning
Data files (if applicable)
They include:
gtf_file.gz
formatted_SRX338100_SRR955759_vs_SRX2581517_SRR5277628_processed.vcf.gz
test_vep_annotation.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: