You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It occurs me that the Package entity doesn't have a name field. This may present a problem if the user only has access to the custom-elements.json, but not the package.json
I think this is a good idea, especially if we see tools that combine manifests at all.
My big comment on #123 is that we need to figure out some namespacing system, since npm isn't the only package registry. There's GitHub packages, JSR, and private registries.
As a start, should we either require an npm: prefix, or assume that plain names are npm packages?
It occurs me that the
Package
entity doesn't have a name field. This may present a problem if the user only has access to the custom-elements.json, but not the package.jsonfor example, when pre-loading manifests into a language server, a la Matsuuu/custom-elements-language-server#20
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: