Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shatranj symbols #665

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2024
Merged

Shatranj symbols #665

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 16, 2024

Conversation

eggrobin
Copy link
Member

@eggrobin eggrobin commented Jan 19, 2024

See L2/24-020 Unicode request for shatranj symbols and L2/24-013 Section 13.

UTC-178-C35 Consensus: Provisionally assign the four Shatranj chess symbols U+1FA54..U+1FA57 as described in L2/24-020. [Ref. Section 13 of L2/24-013R]

[181-C60] Consensus: UTC accepts for encoding in Unicode Version 17.0 the following 297 Arabic, Bengali, Han, Kannada, Latin, Oriya, phonetic, Sharada, Tangut, Telugu, and symbol characters for which the code points have previously been provisionally assigned:

    Arabic (40 characters): 088F, FBC3..FBD2, FD90..FD91, FDC8..FDCE, 10EC5..10EC7, 10ED0..10ED8, 10EFA..10EFB
    Bengali (1 character): 09FF
    Han (5 characters): 16FF2..16FF6
    Kannada (1 character): 0CDC
    Latin (2 characters): A7D2, A7D4
    Oriya (2 characters): 0B53..0B54
    Phonetic (30 characters): 1ACF, 1AD0..1ADD, 1AE0..1AEB, A7CE..A7CF, A7F1
    Sharada (8 characters): 11B60..11B67
    Tangut (145 characters): 187F8..187FF, 18D09..18D1E, 18D80..18DF2
    Telugu (1 character): 0C5C
    Symbols (62 characters): 2B96, 1CCFA..1CCFC, 1CEBA..1CED0, 1CEE0..1CEF0, 1F777..1F77A, 1F8D0..1F8D8, 1FA54..1FA57, 1FBFA

Copy link
Member

@markusicu markusicu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@eggrobin eggrobin marked this pull request as ready for review November 11, 2024 16:25
@eggrobin eggrobin merged commit cf818ba into unicode-org:main Nov 16, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants