Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

packages: Add Mesa3D OpenCL driver #385

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EliasOfWaffle
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@bigpod98 bigpod98 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this already part of upstream packages in worstation?

@EliasOfWaffle
Copy link
Author

Is this already part of upstream packages in worstation?

is part of fedora repos, but is not installed as default in nothing ISO, i think that OpenCL looks much optional for be a default preinstalled in fedora, but the Mesa-LibOpenCL already have Mesa3D RustICL Gallium StateTracker that is conformance with OpenCL 3.0 in Intel Iris Driver, and in future it will be support Zink driver

@bigpod98
Copy link
Contributor

bigpod98 commented Oct 8, 2023

still if it isnt installed with any iso specially fedora Workstation i dont think this should have my approval at this time based on scope found at https://universal-blue.org/scope/

@EliasOfWaffle
Copy link
Author

EliasOfWaffle commented Oct 8, 2023

still if it isnt installed with any iso specially fedora Workstation i dont think this should have my approval at this time based on scope found at https://universal-blue.org/scope/

it can be considered a hardware enablement? because OpenCL is already used in various softwares including Darktable and OpenCL is a heterogeneous API for GPU enablement, in this case Iris driver can use OpenCL API that is a thing that Intel GPUs support.
In case if this can be considered the Intel-gmmlib and intel computer runtime zero level for Intel OneAPI support for intel GPU can be considered a hardware enablement?

@bigpod98
Copy link
Contributor

bigpod98 commented Oct 9, 2023

While yes this can be cinsidered hardwrae enablement could this be packckaged as a part of flatpak or oci image with the peogram using it if so this likely doeant apply as those are recommended methods of installation of software plus installing it here would likely have no effect on programms running inside flatpak and podman(or other oci)

@KyleGospo
Copy link
Member

-1, this works in distrobox and makes alternatives like ROCM harder to use

@bsherman bsherman added the stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed label Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale Issue has not had recent activity or appears to be solved. Stale issues will be automatically closed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants