Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft currency conversion configuration #790

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

istreeter
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -11,6 +10,50 @@
"apiKey": "{{KEY}}",
"baseCurrency": "USD",
"rateAt": "EOD_PRIOR"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@istreeter What's your opinion on exposing the caching settings in parameters here similar to what we do for the API enrichment?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I paused for ages on this question! It makes me nervous to expose such a powerful setting in such a user-facing piece of config. Cache size is a balance between performance vs available memory, and the person configuring this enrichment might not know all of the context for tuning that.

On balance, though, it's better to make it configurable because we never know when we'll need to tune things at run time. So yeah we should put it in this config.

@miike what's your opinion on the ignoreOnError setting that is newly added to the sql enrichment config? If we added it here, it would basically mean.... if we fail to fetch a rate because of a network error, then it's OK to emit the event without the derived context.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the idea of ignoreOnError as there are going to be circumstances where a failed enrichment event (e.g., on checkout) is going to be annoying to not have because a currency conversion couldn't be performed.

I think this does raise the question (for both enrichments) about how you "recover" data that hasn't generated a failed event but might be NULL in the data warehouse though. I don't know that we can (or want to?) change our philosophy around the immutability of these events.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants