[3006.x] fix salt.ufw path in firewall.rst #67019
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Xenon-Blu This PR requires a changelog entry and tests |
|
I am new to GitHub's test suite and not sure what kind of unit test this fix needs, but I made a changelog entry. Could I have assistance with continuing this? This is my first contribution here and I am happy to learn! |
twangboy
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Fixes hyperlink path for the salt.ufw file in the Firewalls tutorial page
What issues does this PR fix or reference?
Broken hyperlink on tutorial page for firewalls
Previous Behavior
Points to https://github.com/saltstack/salt/blob/master/pkg/salt.ufw, which is a dead link
New Behavior
Points to https://github.com/saltstack/salt/blob/master/pkg/common/salt.ufw, which is the intended file
Merge requirements satisfied?
Commits signed with GPG?
Yes