feat(cli.admin.helpers): users can now interactively select keys on disk

[trishankatdatadog]

Description

Users can now interactively select keys as files on disk instead of manually typing or at least pasting their entire paths.

Fixes #(issue): N/A

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected)

Additional requirements

• Tests have been added for the bug fix or new feature
• Docs have been added for the bug fix or new feature

Code of Conduct

By submitting this PR, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct.

• I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct

[kairoaraujo]

Hi @trishankatdatadog, It has very cool functionality! 🎉

To be able to merge it, we will need some extra work (sorry 😃 ):

• We need to add the new dependency as required during installation
  

  repository-service-tuf-cli/pyproject.toml

  Lines 25 to 26 in c69a35e

  	dependencies = [
  	"beaupy",

• We need to work on the unit tests and also the functional tests. Mostly of our Unit Tests and Functional Tests uses "user iteration" in mocked way.

  • Unit tests are in tests/unit/
  • Functional Tests are in the umbrella repository

  I can help you with them

[trishankatdatadog]

We need to work on the unit tests and also the functional tests. Mostly of our Unit Tests and Functional Tests uses "user iteration" in mocked way.

What do you need the tests to do?

[trishankatdatadog]

What do you need the tests to do?

Nvm, I understood day before yesterday after some investigation: prompt_toolkit.prompt() needs patching somehow.

[trishankatdatadog]

@kairoaraujo sorry, don't understand: could you tell me why 905a1d5 doesn't work?

[kairoaraujo]

@kairoaraujo sorry, don't understand: could you tell me why 905a1d5 doesn't work?

See https://github.com/repository-service-tuf/repository-service-tuf-cli/pull/712/files#r1796535461

Basically when you mock, you need to add all the iterations that will call prompt_toolkit

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.23%. Comparing base (47d0a69) to head (3684eb4).
Report is 175 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (47d0a69) and HEAD (3684eb4). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (47d0a69)	HEAD (3684eb4)
	3	2

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #712       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   98.90%   86.23%   -12.67%     
===========================================
  Files          20       26        +6     
  Lines        1367     1395       +28     
===========================================
- Hits         1352     1203      -149     
- Misses         15      192      +177     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[trishankatdatadog]

@kairoaraujo Sorry it took a while, but:

1. How do you want to address coverage?
2. I didn't want to repeat the monkeypatches, but I couldn't figure out how not to DRY here.
3. Would you like to use prompt_toolkit for private keys too in _load_signer_from_file_prompt()?