Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: validate when has errors or warnings #729

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sakuraee
Copy link

@sakuraee sakuraee commented Oct 11, 2024

Fixes: ant-design/ant-design#51008

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能
    • 优化了表单字段的验证逻辑,减少不必要的验证调用。
  • 文档
    • 更新了注释以提高清晰度。

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 11, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
field-form ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 11, 2024 10:59am

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Walkthrough

该拉取请求对 src/useForm.tsFormStore 类的 validateFields 方法进行了修改。主要更改是更新了跳过验证的条件,新增了在字段没有错误或警告时也跳过验证的逻辑。此外,还对注释进行了小幅调整,以提高可读性,但这些更改不影响代码的功能。

Changes

文件路径 更改摘要
src/useForm.ts 修改 validateFields 方法的验证逻辑,新增在字段没有错误或警告时跳过验证的条件;调整注释以提高可读性。

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
当rules为空数组时,能正确的将错误信息去掉 (#[51008])
当rules为空时,无法不再触发校验逻辑 (#[51008])

Poem

🐰 在田野中欢快跳跃,
验证逻辑更新真美妙,
错误无踪心自宁,
代码清晰如晨曦,
小兔子欢呼跳跃,
祝贺新变更,乐无穷! 🌼


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38c629a and 3e17065.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/useForm.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/useForm.ts (3)

903-904: 代码更改看起来不错!

这个改动很好地解决了当验证规则为空时,之前验证的错误无法被清除的问题。现在,如果一个字段没有规则、错误和警告,它将被跳过验证过程,这样可以确保当规则变为空时,之前的错误状态不会持续存在。

这个修改与PR的目标完全一致,应该能够修复报告的bug。它提高了表单验证的灵活性,特别是在处理动态变化的验证规则时。


Line range hint 1-1186: 总体评审意见

这个PR的改动虽然很小,但解决了一个重要的问题:当验证规则变为空时,能够正确地清除之前的验证错误。这个修改与PR的目标完全一致,应该能够解决报告的bug。

主要优点:

  1. 提高了表单验证的灵活性,特别是在处理动态变化的验证规则时。
  2. 代码改动简洁,易于理解。

需要注意的点:

  1. 由于useForm.ts文件包含复杂的表单管理和验证逻辑,这个改动可能会对整个表单库的行为产生广泛影响。
  2. 建议进行全面的测试,特别是在各种边缘情况下,以确保这个改动不会引入新的问题。
  3. 可能需要更新相关文档,以反映这个新的行为。

总的来说,这个改动是一个很好的优化,应该能够提高表单组件的可用性和灵活性。


903-904: 建议进行全面测试

虽然这个改动很小,但它可能会对整个应用程序的表单验证行为产生重大影响。建议进行以下验证:

  1. 测试各种场景下的表单验证,特别是涉及动态改变验证规则的情况。
  2. 确保这个改动不会在依赖先前验证行为的应用程序其他部分引入意外的副作用。
  3. 验证当字段的验证规则变为空数组时,之前的错误确实被清除。
  4. 检查这个改动是否影响了表单的性能,特别是在处理大型复杂表单时。

为了协助验证,您可以运行以下脚本来检查codebase中是否有其他地方可能受到这个改动的影响:

这将帮助您识别可能需要额外关注或测试的areas。


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@sakuraee sakuraee changed the title validate when has errors or warnings fix: validate when has errors or warnings Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

动态规则rules为空时,已校验出的错误无法被消除
1 participant