✨ WIP: Cluster provider and cluster-aware controllers #3019
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: embik The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/XXL
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Iván Álvarez <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
On-behalf-of: SAP [email protected] Co-authored-by: Vince Prignano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dr. Stefan Schimanski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marvin Beckers <[email protected]>
embik
force-pushed
the
embik-typed-cluster-support
branch
from
9584ab6
to
9b3f243
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message
|
@embik: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
| // WithHandlerWrapper sets an optional wrapper function that is applied to the TypedEventHandler for watches set up via the Watches func. | ||
| func (blder *TypedBuilder[request]) WithHandlerWrapper(handlerWrapper func(handler.TypedEventHandler[client.Object, request], cluster.Cluster) handler.TypedEventHandler[client.Object, request]) *TypedBuilder[request] { | ||
| blder.handlerWrapper = handlerWrapper | ||
| return blder | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A note on this: I would have preferred for this to be an option that can be passed to Watches, but the main challenge there was the untypedWatchesInput interface not allowing to have a generic type for request (since it's untyped). I'm still very much open to making it an opt, but I haven't found a good way to adjust the existing interface without breaking existing usage.
This is a continuation of #2726 and #2207, a prototype for a multi-cluster support in controller-runtime. A design proposal is at #2746 which will need updating depending on the feedback for this PR. I've reorganized code changes into different commits than the previous attempts, but tried to keep authorship of changes faithful to the commits this work is based on.
The main change from the previous PR (#2726) is the update to typed generics support and adjustment to have a BYO request type. The implications of that is a) that you will need to bring your own typed EventHandler and b) that a wrapper function is needed to inject information (mostly the cluster name) when establishing a handler.
Apart from that, the core design of this is the cluster provider that can be plugged into a manager. This unlocks different ways to discover the Kubernetes "fleet" that is being reconciled.
The current status of this PR is that the
fleetexample works, but thefleet-namespaceone does not. Needs a bit more work from my side to figure out why it's not working.