Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add a priority queue #3014

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alvaroaleman
Copy link
Member

This change contains the POC of a priority workqueue that allows to prioritize events over one another. It is opt-in and will by default de-prioritize events originating from the initial listwatch and from periodic resyncs.

Ref #2374
Ref #3013
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 17, 2024
@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman changed the title :sparkling: POC of a priority queue ✨ POC of a priority queue Nov 17, 2024
@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman force-pushed the controllerwq branch 4 times, most recently from 16a746b to 2646684 Compare November 19, 2024 04:29
This change contains the POC of a priority workqueue that allows to
prioritize events over one another. It is opt-in and will by default
de-prioritize events originating from the initial listwatch and from
periodic resyncs.
```
$ benchstat slice.txt btree.txt
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/controllerworkqueue
cpu: Apple M2 Pro
              │  slice.txt  │              btree.txt              │
              │   sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base                │
AddGetDone-10   5.078m ± 0%   1.163m ± 0%  -77.09% (p=0.000 n=10)

              │  slice.txt   │              btree.txt               │
              │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base                │
AddGetDone-10   55.11Ki ± 0%   46.98Ki ± 0%  -14.75% (p=0.000 n=10)

              │  slice.txt  │              btree.txt              │
              │  allocs/op  │  allocs/op   vs base                │
AddGetDone-10   3.000k ± 0%   1.000k ± 0%  -66.67% (p=0.000 n=10)
```
@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman changed the title ✨ POC of a priority queue ✨ Add a priority queue Nov 24, 2024
This reverts commit ce23de5.

Speedup is tiny and at the expense of increased mem usage (which due to
increasing GC pressure is likely the explanation why its so small), so
doesn't seem worth it overall:
```
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/controller/priorityqueue
cpu: Apple M2 Pro
                    │ blocking.txt │          non-blocking.txt          │
                    │    sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base               │
AddGetDone-10          1.320m ± 1%   1.410m ± 0%  +6.81% (p=0.000 n=10)
AddOnly-10             373.9µ ± 1%   343.2µ ± 1%  -8.22% (p=0.000 n=10)
AddLockContended-10    375.8µ ± 1%   342.8µ ± 1%  -8.78% (p=0.000 n=10)
geomean                570.3µ        549.4µ       -3.66%

                    │ blocking.txt │            non-blocking.txt             │
                    │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base                   │
AddGetDone-10         109.9Ki ± 0%   164.2Ki ± 0%     +49.42% (p=0.000 n=10)
AddOnly-10              553.0 ± 2%   56045.0 ± 0%  +10034.72% (p=0.000 n=10)
AddLockContended-10     569.0 ± 6%   56045.0 ± 0%   +9749.74% (p=0.000 n=10)
geomean               3.207Ki        78.94Ki        +2361.60%

                    │ blocking.txt │            non-blocking.txt             │
                    │  allocs/op   │  allocs/op    vs base                   │
AddGetDone-10          3.013k ± 0%    5.001k ± 0%     +65.98% (p=0.000 n=10)
AddOnly-10              16.00 ± 6%   2000.00 ± 0%  +12400.00% (p=0.000 n=10)
AddLockContended-10     16.00 ± 6%   2000.00 ± 0%  +12400.00% (p=0.000 n=10)
geomean                 91.71         2.715k        +2860.01%
```
@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Nov 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants