🌱 Drop unnecessary etcd call from KCP #11489
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/L
|
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
fabriziopandini
changed the title
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 219f7a6fba54f6b3ab5f4982ae39ed45a5898964
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrischdi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
/cherry-pick release-1.9 |
|
@fabriziopandini: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@fabriziopandini: new pull request created: #11493 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
We recently added the list of etcd members to KCP's scope, so we can start dropping calls re-reading the same info.
This is the first one that caught my attention
Area example:
/area provider/control-plane-kubeadm