feat: finish task #13
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@XinxinAkuma has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new files and functionalities to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 45
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
XinxinAkuma/database1/userdatabase.go (1)
1-7: Consider using a more descriptive package name.The package name
database1is not idiomatic Go. Package names should be descriptive and reflect the purpose of the package. Consider renaming it to something likedbconnectionordbmanager.XinxinAkuma/database2/prodatabse.go (3)
1-7: Consider renaming the package to follow Go naming conventions.The package name
database2is not idiomatic in Go. Package names should be short, concise, and avoid numbers. Consider renaming it to something more descriptive likedbordatabase.
34-39: The AutoMigrate function looks good, with a minor suggestion.The implementation is concise and follows Go idioms. Error handling is appropriate. Consider adding a log message for successful migration to provide more visibility into the process.
You could add a success log message like this:
func AutoMigrate(models ...interface{}) { err := DB.AutoMigrate(models...) if err != nil { log.Fatal("自动迁移失败:", err) } log.Println("自动迁移成功完成") }
1-39: Overall review summaryThe file provides a functional setup for database connection and migration using GORM. However, there are several areas for improvement:
- The package name
database2is not idiomatic. Consider renaming it.- The use of a global variable for the database connection could be replaced with dependency injection for better testability.
- Sensitive information is hardcoded in the DSN string, which is a security risk. Use environment variables or a configuration file instead.
- The
InitDBfunction could be more flexible by accepting configuration options.- The
AutoMigratefunction is well-implemented but could benefit from additional logging for successful migrations.Addressing these points will improve the security, flexibility, and maintainability of the code.
XinxinAkuma/problem/search.go (2)
50-55: Remove redundant condition check.The condition
if result.Error == nilis redundant because this case is already handled by the previous if statement. You can simplify this part of the code.You can modify the code like this:
-if result.Error == nil { - c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ - "message": "已找到问题.", - "question_id": question.ID, - }) -} +c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ + "message": "已找到问题.", + "question_id": question.ID, +})This change simplifies the code without altering its functionality.
1-56: Overall, good implementation with room for improvement.The search functionality is implemented well, with proper use of the Gin framework and appropriate HTTP status codes. However, there are a few areas where the code could be enhanced:
- Consider implementing pagination for search results, especially if the database can return multiple matches.
- Add input sanitization to prevent potential SQL injection attacks, even though GORM provides some protection.
- Implement logging throughout the function to aid in debugging and monitoring.
- Consider adding unit tests to ensure the function behaves correctly under various scenarios.
Here's a suggestion for implementing pagination:
func SearchProblem(c *gin.Context) { var search Search if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&search); err != nil { c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{"error": "Invalid input."}) return } page, _ := strconv.Atoi(c.DefaultQuery("page", "1")) pageSize, _ := strconv.Atoi(c.DefaultQuery("page_size", "10")) var questions []Problem var total int64 result := database2.DB.Where("question LIKE ?", "%"+search.Search+"%"). Offset((page - 1) * pageSize). Limit(pageSize). Find(&questions) database2.DB.Model(&Problem{}).Where("question LIKE ?", "%"+search.Search+"%").Count(&total) if result.Error != nil { c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{"error": "An error occurred while processing your request."}) log.Printf("Database error: %v", result.Error) return } c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ "questions": questions, "total": total, "page": page, "page_size": pageSize, }) }This implementation adds pagination and returns multiple results, which can be more useful for users.
XinxinAkuma/login/login.go (3)
5-5: Consider renaming the packagedatabase1todatabaseThe package name
database1may be confusing and doesn't follow Go's naming conventions. If there's only one database package, consider renaming it todatabasefor clarity.Apply this diff:
- "Akuma/database1" + "Akuma/database"
38-41: Log database errors for better troubleshootingWhen fetching the user from the database, any errors are not logged. Logging the error can help in diagnosing issues without exposing sensitive information to the client.
Apply this change:
if err := database1.DB.Where("name = ?", input.Name).First(&user).Error; err != nil { + c.Error(err) c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "用户名或密码错误"}) return }
51-56: Add error logging when token generation failsIf
auth.GenerateTokenfails, the error is not logged. Logging the error can assist in debugging token generation issues.Apply this change:
if err != nil { + c.Error(err) c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ "error": "无法生成token", }) return }XinxinAkuma/problem/update.go (1)
12-13: Add detailed GoDoc comments for theUpdatefunctionAdding detailed documentation for the
Updatefunction improves code readability and helps other developers understand its purpose and usage. Follow the GoDoc style conventions for commenting exported functions.Example:
// Update handles updating an existing problem. // It expects an ID parameter in the URL and a JSON body with the updated problem data. // Returns a JSON response with a success message and the updated problem or an error message. func Update(c *gin.Context) { // ... }XinxinAkuma/problem/create.go (1)
28-36: Add a unique constraint to thequestionfield in the database.Relying on application-level checks to prevent duplicate questions can lead to race conditions in concurrent environments. By adding a unique constraint at the database level, you ensure data integrity even under high concurrency.
Would you like assistance in updating the database schema to include this constraint?
XinxinAkuma/register/register.go (2)
12-14: Consider renamingTpasswordtoConfirmPasswordfor clarityThe field
Tpasswordrepresents the confirmation of the password. Renaming it toConfirmPasswordwould make the code more readable and self-explanatory.Apply this diff to rename the field:
type User struct { ID uint `gorm:"primaryKey"` Name string `json:"name" binding:"required" gorm:"unique"` - Tpassword string `json:"tpassword" binding:"required" gorm:"-"` + ConfirmPassword string `json:"confirm_password" binding:"required" gorm:"-"` Role string `json:"role" gorm:"default:'user'"` // 默认角色为普通用户 InviteCode string `json:"invite_code" binding:"-"` // 邀请码字段 }Be sure to update all references to this field in your code.
69-74: Log the specific error when user creation failsWhen the database insertion fails, logging the specific error can help in debugging issues related to database constraints or connectivity.
Apply this diff to log the error:
if err := database1.DB.Create(®ister).Error; err != nil { c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ "error": "无法保存用户信息", }) + // Log the error for debugging purposes + // log.Errorf("Failed to create user: %v", err) return }Ensure to import the necessary logging package and configure it appropriately.
XinxinAkuma/auth/jwt.go (2)
82-83: Use constants for context keys to avoid potential key collisions.Using string literals for context keys can lead to collisions and typos. Defining constants improves maintainability and reduces errors.
Define constants for the context keys:
+const ( + UserIDKey = "user_id" + UserNameKey = "user_name" +) func AuthMiddleware() gin.HandlerFunc { return func(c *gin.Context) { // ... existing code ... // Store user information in context - c.Set("user_id", claims.UserID) - c.Set("user_name", claims.UserName) + c.Set(UserIDKey, claims.UserID) + c.Set(UserNameKey, claims.UserName) } else { c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "无效的Token"}) c.Abort() return }This makes it easier to manage context keys and prevents possible conflicts.
17-19: Ensure proper JSON tag naming conventions.The JSON tag for
UserNameis"name". For consistency and clarity, consider using"user_name".Apply this diff to update the JSON tag:
type Claims struct { UserID uint `json:"user_id"` - UserName string `json:"name"` + UserName string `json:"user_name"` jwt.RegisteredClaims }This aligns the JSON field names with the struct field names and maintains consistency.
XinxinAkuma/problem/submission.go (1)
40-41: Rename variableUserIDtouserfor clarityCurrently, the variable
UserIDholds aUserstruct. Renaming it touserimproves readability and avoids confusion.Apply this change:
func Submit(c *gin.Context) { //... - var UserID User - if err := database1.DB.Where("id=?", userID).First(&UserID).Error; err != nil { + var user User + if err := database1.DB.Where("id = ?", userID).First(&user).Error; err != nil { c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ "error": "用户不存在。", }) return } - submit.UserID = UserID.ID + submit.UserID = user.ID //... } func GetSubmission(c *gin.Context) { //... - var UserID User - if err := database1.DB.Where("id=?", userID).First(&UserID).Error; err != nil { + var user User + if err := database1.DB.Where("id = ?", userID).First(&user).Error; err != nil { c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ "error": "用户不存在。", }) return } //... }Also applies to: 97-98
XinxinAkuma/AI/AI.go (3)
126-145: Remove Redundant Comments for Clean CodeThe comments
// 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名are repeated multiple times and can clutter the code, making it less readable.Apply this diff to remove unnecessary comments:
func genParams1(appid, question string) map[string]interface{} { messages := []Message{ {Role: "user", Content: question}, } data := map[string]interface{}{ - "header": map[string]interface{}{ // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "app_id": appid, // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 + "header": map[string]interface{}{ + "app_id": appid, }, - "parameter": map[string]interface{}{ // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "chat": map[string]interface{}{ // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "domain": "general", // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "temperature": float64(0.8), // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "top_k": int64(6), // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "max_tokens": int64(2048), // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "auditing": "default", // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 + "parameter": map[string]interface{}{ + "chat": map[string]interface{}{ + "domain": "general", + "temperature": 0.8, + "top_k": 6, + "max_tokens": 2048, + "auditing": "default", }, }, - "payload": map[string]interface{}{ // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "message": map[string]interface{}{ // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 - "text": messages, // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 + "payload": map[string]interface{}{ + "message": map[string]interface{}{ + "text": messages, }, }, } - return data // 根据实际情况修改返回的数据结构和字段名 + return data }This change improves code readability and maintains focus on essential code elements.
155-156: Remove Unused Commented CodeThe commented-out line setting a hardcoded date is unnecessary and may cause confusion.
Apply this diff to remove the unused code:
//签名时间 date := time.Now().UTC().Format(time.RFC1123) -//date = "Tue, 28 May 2019 09:10:42 MST"Removing unused code helps keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
62-95: Enhance Error Messages for Easier DebuggingThe error messages throughout the JSON parsing section are generic and may not provide enough context when an error occurs. Providing more detailed error messages can aid in debugging.
For example, update the error messages to include the expected and actual types or values:
if !ok { - return "", fmt.Errorf("无效的payload格式") + return "", fmt.Errorf("无效的payload格式，期望为map[string]interface{}，实际为%T", data["payload"]) }Apply similar changes to other error messages in this section to provide clearer context.
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go (3)
18-18: Add documentation comment for the exported functionDeleteProblem.Adding a comment for the exported function improves code readability and aligns with Go conventions.
Apply this diff:
+// DeleteProblem handles the deletion of a problem by an admin user. func DeleteProblem(c *gin.Context) {
54-59: Handle potential cascading effects when deleting a problem.Deleting a problem might affect related records (e.g., answers, comments). Ensure that foreign key constraints are handled appropriately, and consider using soft deletes if necessary.
62-62: Consider localization for success messages.The success message is in Chinese ("问题已成功删除。"). Ensure this aligns with the application's localization strategy. If the application supports multiple languages, consider implementing internationalization (i18n).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
XinxinAkuma/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- XinxinAkuma/AI/AI.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/auth/jwt.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/database1/userdatabase.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/database2/prodatabse.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/go.mod (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/login/login.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/main.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/create.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/search.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/submission.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/update.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/register/register.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/router/router.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
XinxinAkuma/AI/AI.go
19-19: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
20-20: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
XinxinAkuma/main.go (1)
1-9: Verify the import pathsThe import paths starting with "Akuma/" might cause issues if they don't match the module name in go.mod. Ensure that these import paths are correct and that the module name in go.mod is set to "Akuma".
Run the following script to check the module name and directory structure:
✅ Verification successful
Import paths are correctly configured
The import paths in
main.gostart withAkuma/and align with the module name specified inXinxinAkuma/go.mod. No issues found regarding the import paths.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module name and directory structure # Test 1: Check the module name in go.mod echo "Module name in go.mod:" cat go.mod | grep "^module" # Test 2: Check the directory structure echo "Directory structure:" tree -L 2Length of output: 411
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the module name in XinxinAkuma/go.mod and confirm import paths # Test 1: Check the module name in XinxinAkuma/go.mod echo "Module name in XinxinAkuma/go.mod:" cat XinxinAkuma/go.mod | grep "^module" # Test 2: Verify import paths in main.go echo "Import paths in main.go:" grep "^import (" XinxinAkuma/main.goLength of output: 240
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract all import paths from XinxinAkuma/main.go to verify against the module name # Extract import block and list all imported packages echo "Import paths in XinxinAkuma/main.go:" awk '/import\s*\(/,/\)/' XinxinAkuma/main.go | grep '"' | awk -F '"' '{print $2}'Length of output: 240
XinxinAkuma/router/router.go (2)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name 'router' is suitable for this file's purpose. The imports are relevant to the implemented functionality, including local packages for authentication, login, problem management, and registration, as well as the Gin framework for routing.
11-12: LGTM: Function signature is well-defined.The
InitRouter()function is appropriately named and correctly returns a*gin.Engine, which is the expected type for a Gin router instance.XinxinAkuma/problem/search.go (2)
11-13: LGTM! The Search struct is well-defined.The struct definition is concise and appropriate for its purpose. The JSON tag and "required" binding tag are correctly used to ensure proper JSON handling and validation.
1-9: LGTM! Package declaration and imports look good.The package name and imports are appropriate for the functionality being implemented. However, please ensure that the import path
Akuma/database2is correct and follows your project's structure.Let's verify the existence and usage of the
database2package:✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
Akuma/database2package exists and is used correctly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the database2 package # Test 1: Check if the database2 package exists fd -t d database2 # Test 2: Check for other usages of the database2 package rg --type go "Akuma/database2"Length of output: 361
XinxinAkuma/go.mod (1)
5-65:⚠️ Potential issueReview and optimize dependencies
All dependencies are marked as indirect. This suggests that they're not directly imported in your module. Consider reviewing your code to ensure you're only including necessary dependencies.
There's a redundancy in JWT libraries:
github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go(line 12)github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4(line 23)The
dgrijalva/jwt-gois deprecated. Stick withgolang-jwt/jwt/v4for better maintenance and security.Some dependencies might be unnecessary if not directly used in your project. For example, if you're not using websockets, you can remove
github.com/gorilla/websocket.To address these issues:
- Review your code and remove any unused dependencies.
- Remove the deprecated JWT library.
Example diff for removing the deprecated JWT library:
- github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go v3.2.0+incompatible // indirectTo help identify unused dependencies, you can run:
This script will help identify unused imports in your Go files, which can guide you in removing unnecessary dependencies from your
go.modfile.XinxinAkuma/register/register.go (1)
19-83: Overall, theRegisterfunction is well-implementedThe registration logic is well-structured, and error handling covers most potential issues. Good job on securing the password using bcrypt hashing.
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go (1)
27-27: Verify consistency between database query column and user struct field.In the database query, you're using
Where("name=?", adminInput.Username), but the field isUsername. Ensure that the database column is indeedname, or update the query to match the correct column name in the database.
XinxinAkuma/main.go
Outdated
| func main() { | ||
| database1.InitDB() | ||
| database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{}) | ||
| database2.InitDB() | ||
| database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{}) | ||
|
|
||
| r := router.InitRouter() | ||
| err := r.Run(":8080") | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring for improved modularity
The current main function handles multiple responsibilities: database initialization, migrations, and server setup. To improve readability and maintainability, consider refactoring this into smaller, focused functions.
Here's a suggested refactoring:
func initDatabases() error {
if err := database1.InitDB(); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to initialize database1: %w", err)
}
if err := database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{}); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to migrate User: %w", err)
}
if err := database2.InitDB(); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to initialize database2: %w", err)
}
if err := database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{}); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to migrate Problem and Submission: %w", err)
}
return nil
}
func startServer(r *gin.Engine) error {
port := os.Getenv("PORT")
if port == "" {
port = "8080" // default port
}
log.Printf("Starting server on port %s", port)
return r.Run(":" + port)
}
func main() {
if err := initDatabases(); err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Database initialization failed: %v", err)
}
r := router.InitRouter()
if err := startServer(r); err != nil {
log.Fatalf("Server failed to start: %v", err)
}
}This refactoring separates concerns, improves error handling, and makes the main function more concise and easier to understand at a glance.
XinxinAkuma/main.go
Outdated
| r := router.InitRouter() | ||
| err := r.Run(":8080") | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve server configuration and error handling
The current implementation uses a hardcoded port and doesn't provide informative error handling. Consider the following improvements:
- Use environment variables or a configuration file for the port number to make it flexible across different environments.
- Add logging for successful server start and any errors that occur.
Here's a suggested improvement:
+ import (
+ "log"
+ "os"
+ )
+
+ // ... (rest of the imports)
+
r := router.InitRouter()
- err := r.Run(":8080")
+ port := os.Getenv("PORT")
+ if port == "" {
+ port = "8080" // default port
+ }
+ log.Printf("Starting server on port %s", port)
+ err := r.Run(":" + port)
if err != nil {
- return
+ log.Fatalf("Failed to start server: %v", err)
}This change makes the port configurable via an environment variable and adds logging for better observability.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| r := router.InitRouter() | |
| err := r.Run(":8080") | |
| if err != nil { | |
| return | |
| } | |
| import ( | |
| "log" | |
| "os" | |
| ) | |
| // ... (rest of the imports) | |
| r := router.InitRouter() | |
| port := os.Getenv("PORT") | |
| if port == "" { | |
| port = "8080" // default port | |
| } | |
| log.Printf("Starting server on port %s", port) | |
| err := r.Run(":" + port) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| log.Fatalf("Failed to start server: %v", err) | |
| } |
| database1.InitDB() | ||
| database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{}) | ||
| database2.InitDB() | ||
| database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for database operations
The current implementation doesn't handle potential errors from database initialization or migration. This could lead to silent failures and make debugging difficult.
Also, consider separating development and production configurations, especially for auto-migrations which can be risky in a production environment.
Here's a suggested improvement:
- database1.InitDB()
- database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{})
- database2.InitDB()
- database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{})
+ if err := database1.InitDB(); err != nil {
+ log.Fatalf("Failed to initialize database1: %v", err)
+ }
+ if err := database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{}); err != nil {
+ log.Fatalf("Failed to migrate User: %v", err)
+ }
+ if err := database2.InitDB(); err != nil {
+ log.Fatalf("Failed to initialize database2: %v", err)
+ }
+ if err := database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{}); err != nil {
+ log.Fatalf("Failed to migrate Problem and Submission: %v", err)
+ }Also, consider adding a configuration flag to enable/disable auto-migrations based on the environment (development/production).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| database1.InitDB() | |
| database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{}) | |
| database2.InitDB() | |
| database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{}) | |
| if err := database1.InitDB(); err != nil { | |
| log.Fatalf("Failed to initialize database1: %v", err) | |
| } | |
| if err := database1.AutoMigrate(®ister.User{}); err != nil { | |
| log.Fatalf("Failed to migrate User: %v", err) | |
| } | |
| if err := database2.InitDB(); err != nil { | |
| log.Fatalf("Failed to initialize database2: %v", err) | |
| } | |
| if err := database2.AutoMigrate(&problem.Problem{}, &problem.Submission{}); err != nil { | |
| log.Fatalf("Failed to migrate Problem and Submission: %v", err) | |
| } |
| "log" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| var DB *gorm.DB |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider encapsulating the DB variable.
While it's common to have a package-level database variable, exposing it directly can lead to issues with encapsulation and make it harder to manage database access across the application. Consider making DB unexported (lowercase db) and providing methods to interact with it instead.
| // InitDB 初始化数据库连接 | ||
| func InitDB() { | ||
| dsn := "root:Wu12345678@tcp(127.0.0.1:3306)/user_db?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local" | ||
| var err error | ||
| DB, err = gorm.Open(mysql.Open(dsn), &gorm.Config{}) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| log.Fatal("无法连接到数据库:", err) | ||
| } | ||
| log.Println("数据库连接成功") | ||
|
|
||
| // 测试数据库连接 | ||
| sqlDB, err := DB.DB() | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| log.Fatal("获取数据库实例失败:", err) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Ping 数据库 | ||
| if err := sqlDB.Ping(); err != nil { | ||
| log.Fatal("数据库连接失败:", err) | ||
| } | ||
| log.Println("数据库连接测试成功") | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve database initialization practices.
-
Use environment variables for database credentials:
Instead of hardcoding the DSN, consider using environment variables or a configuration file. This improves security and flexibility.dsn := fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s@tcp(%s:%s)/%s?charset=utf8mb4&parseTime=True&loc=Local", os.Getenv("DB_USER"), os.Getenv("DB_PASSWORD"), os.Getenv("DB_HOST"), os.Getenv("DB_PORT"), os.Getenv("DB_NAME"))
-
Return errors instead of using log.Fatal:
Usinglog.Fatalterminates the program, which might not be desirable in all scenarios. Consider returning errors to allow the caller to decide how to handle them.func InitDB() error { // ... (connection logic) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to connect to database: %w", err) } // ... (rest of the function) return nil }
-
Good practice: Testing the connection
Testing the connection with a ping is a good practice to ensure the database is accessible.
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Outdated
| type admin struct { | ||
| Username string `json:"username" binding:"required"` | ||
| QuestionID int `json:"questionid" binding:"required"` | ||
| Password string `json:"password" binding:"required"` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider renaming the admin struct to reflect its purpose.
The struct admin represents the input data for deleting a problem. Renaming it to something like DeleteProblemRequest can improve code clarity.
Apply this diff to rename the struct:
-type admin struct {
+type DeleteProblemRequest struct {
Username string `json:"username" binding:"required"`
QuestionID int `json:"questionid" binding:"required"`
Password string `json:"password" binding:"required"`
}Update references accordingly:
- var adminInput admin
+ var requestData DeleteProblemRequest
- if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&adminInput); err != nil {
+ if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&requestData); err != nil {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type admin struct { | |
| Username string `json:"username" binding:"required"` | |
| QuestionID int `json:"questionid" binding:"required"` | |
| Password string `json:"password" binding:"required"` | |
| } | |
| type DeleteProblemRequest struct { | |
| Username string `json:"username" binding:"required"` | |
| QuestionID int `json:"questionid" binding:"required"` | |
| Password string `json:"password" binding:"required"` | |
| } |
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Outdated
| var user User | ||
| if err := database1.DB.Where("name=?", admin.Username).First(&user).Error; err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "用户不存在。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Password verification is missing—potential security vulnerability.
The Password field from the input is not being used to authenticate the admin user. This could allow unauthorized users to perform delete operations if they know an admin's username. Please add password verification to ensure only authorized users can delete problems.
Apply this diff to add password verification:
// After fetching 'user' from the database
+ if user.Password != adminInput.Password {
+ c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{
+ "error": "密码错误。",
+ })
+ return
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var user User | |
| if err := database1.DB.Where("name=?", admin.Username).First(&user).Error; err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "用户不存在。", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| var user User | |
| if err := database1.DB.Where("name=?", admin.Username).First(&user).Error; err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "用户不存在。", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } | |
| if user.Password != adminInput.Password { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "密码错误。", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } |
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func DeleteProblem(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| var admin admin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid naming collision between the variable and struct admin.
Using the same name admin for both the struct type and the variable can lead to confusion and is not idiomatic in Go. Consider renaming the variable to improve code readability.
Apply this diff to rename the variable:
- var admin admin
+ var adminInput adminAnd update subsequent references:
- if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&admin); err != nil {
+ if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&adminInput); err != nil {Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Outdated
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "没有此权限。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use appropriate HTTP status code for permission errors.
When a user does not have the required permissions, it's more appropriate to return 403 Forbidden instead of 400 Bad Request.
Apply this diff to change the status code:
- c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{
+ c.JSON(http.StatusForbidden, gin.H{
"error": "没有此权限。",
})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "没有此权限。", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusForbidden, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "没有此权限。", | |
| }) | |
| return |
XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Outdated
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| var user User |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Ambiguous User Struct Usage
The User struct is imported from both Akuma/database1 and Akuma/database2, but in problem/delete.go, User is used without a package qualifier. This creates ambiguity about which User struct is being referenced. To resolve this, specify the package name when using User (e.g., database1.User or database2.User) or alias the imports to clearly distinguish between them.
🔗 Analysis chain
Ensure User and Problem structs are defined and imported properly.
The code references User and Problem structs, but their definitions are not shown. Verify that these structs are defined in the appropriate packages and imported correctly.
Run the following script to check for their definitions:
Also applies to: 40-40
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for definitions of 'User' and 'Problem' structs.
# Search for 'User' struct definition
rg --type go 'type\s+User\s+struct'
# Search for 'Problem' struct definition
rg --type go 'type\s+Problem\s+struct'
Length of output: 281
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract import statements from problem/delete.go to verify struct imports.
# Extract import lines from delete.go
rg '^import' XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract all import statements from problem/delete.go to verify struct imports.
# Extract lines between 'import (' and ')' in delete.go
sed -n '/^import\s*(/,/^)/p' XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all instances of 'User' in problem/delete.go to verify correct usage.
rg '\bUser\b' XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go
Length of output: 60
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
XinxinAkuma/problem/search.go (2)
15-32: Consider internationalizing error messages.The error handling for JSON binding and empty search terms is good. However, the error messages are currently in Chinese. For better internationalization, consider using a translation system that can provide messages in multiple languages based on the user's locale.
Example of how you might approach this:
import "github.com/nicksnyder/go-i18n/v2/i18n" // Initialize the i18n bundle and localize function elsewhere in your app func SearchProblem(c *gin.Context) { // ... existing code ... if search.Search == "" { c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ "error": localize("please_enter_question"), }) return } // ... rest of the function ... }This approach allows for easy translation to multiple languages in the future.
50-56: Remove redundant error check.The error check on line 50 is unnecessary because this code block will only be reached if there's no error. You can simplify this part of the function:
- if result.Error == nil { - c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ - "message": "已找到问题.", - "question_id": question.ID, - }) - } + c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ + "message": "已找到问题.", + "question_id": question.ID, + })This change makes the code more concise without changing its functionality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
XinxinAkuma/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- XinxinAkuma/AI/AI.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/go.mod (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/delete.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/search.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/submission.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/problem/update.go (1 hunks)
- XinxinAkuma/router/router.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- XinxinAkuma/AI/AI.go
- XinxinAkuma/go.mod
- XinxinAkuma/router/router.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
XinxinAkuma/problem/search.go (4)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name "problem" and the imports, including the custom "Akuma/database2" package, align well with the file's purpose of implementing problem search functionality.
11-13: LGTM: Search struct is well-defined.The
Searchstruct is correctly defined with appropriate JSON and binding tags. The "required" binding ensures that a search term must be provided, which is good for input validation.
1-56: Overall, good implementation with room for minor improvements.The search functionality is well-implemented with appropriate error handling and flexible database querying. The suggested improvements mainly focus on:
- Internationalizing error messages for better global usability.
- Enhancing security by not exposing raw database errors.
- Removing a redundant error check for cleaner code.
These changes will further improve the robustness and maintainability of the code. Great job on implementing the LIKE query for more flexible searching as suggested in a previous review!
34-48:⚠️ Potential issueAvoid exposing raw database errors in the response.
Great job on implementing the LIKE query for more flexible searching! However, there's still a security concern:
Directly including the database error in the response might expose sensitive information. It's better to log the error internally and return a generic error message to the client.
Consider modifying the error response like this:
c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ - "error": "查询错误。" + result.Error.Error(), + "error": "An internal error occurred while processing your request.", }) +// Log the actual error internally +log.Printf("Database error: %v", result.Error)This change addresses the security concern while still allowing for proper error tracking.
XinxinAkuma/problem/update.go (4)
1-9: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are correctly defined and relevant to the file's purpose.
11-14: LGTM: Improved input binding with DTO struct.The
updateProblemstruct effectively serves as a Data Transfer Object (DTO) for input binding, addressing the concern raised in a previous review. This approach prevents unintended updates to fields that should not be modified by the client.
16-33: LGTM: Input binding and user authentication are well-implemented.The function correctly binds JSON input to the
updateProblemstruct and properly checks for user authentication. Error handling is appropriate, with clear and informative error messages.
1-77: Overall assessment: Good implementation with room for improvementThe
Updatefunction is well-structured with proper input validation, authentication, and database operations. Error handling is comprehensive, and appropriate HTTP status codes are used throughout.Main points for improvement:
- Consider using dependency injection for database access to improve testability and flexibility.
- Remove the update of
CreatedAtand consider adding anUpdatedAtfield to track last modification time.These changes will enhance the maintainability and correctness of the code. Great job on implementing the DTO pattern for input binding as suggested in a previous review!
XinxinAkuma/problem/submission.go (1)
145-151:⚠️ Potential issueHandle errors from the database query when retrieving submissions
In the
GenerateAnswerfunction, when retrieving submissions from the database, you should check for errors to ensure the application can respond appropriately if something goes wrong.Update the code to include error handling:
var submissions []Submission -if err := database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionID).Find(&submissions).Error; err != nil { +if err := database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionID).Find(&submissions).Error; err != nil { c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ "error": "无法获取提交的回答。", }) return }This ensures that any errors during the database retrieval are properly managed.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| // 检查是否存在该问题 | ||
| var existingProblem Problem | ||
| if err := database2.DB.First(&existingProblem, updatedProblem.QuestionId).Error; err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "问题未找到。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // 检查是否存在与更新的问题内容相同的其他问题 | ||
| var duplicateProblem Problem | ||
| result := database2.DB.Where("question = ? AND id != ?", updatedProblem.Question, updatedProblem.QuestionId).First(&duplicateProblem) | ||
| if result.Error == nil { | ||
| // 如果找到与更新内容相同但 ID 不同的问题，返回错误 | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusConflict, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "相同问题已存在。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
LGTM with suggestion: Problem existence and duplication checks are well-implemented.
The function correctly checks for the existence of the problem and potential duplicates. Error handling and status codes are appropriate. However, consider improving the database access method:
Consider using dependency injection for the database access instead of relying on a global database2.DB instance. This would improve testability and flexibility. You could pass a database interface as a parameter to the Update function or use a method on a struct that holds the database connection.
Example:
type ProblemService struct {
DB *gorm.DB
}
func (s *ProblemService) Update(c *gin.Context) {
// Use s.DB instead of database2.DB
}This approach allows for easier mocking in tests and better separation of concerns.
| if userid != existingProblem.UserID { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "你没有权限更新其他人问题。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| existingProblem.Question = updatedProblem.Question | ||
| existingProblem.CreatedAt = time.Now() | ||
|
|
||
| if err := database2.DB.Save(&existingProblem).Error; err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "问题更新失败。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // 返回成功响应 | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ | ||
| "message": "问题更新成功。", | ||
| "problem": existingProblem, | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix: Remove CreatedAt update and consider adding UpdatedAt field.
The update logic is mostly correct, but there's an issue with updating the CreatedAt timestamp:
-
Remove the line that updates
CreatedAt. This field should represent when the record was initially created and should not be modified during updates. -
Consider adding an
UpdatedAtfield to track when a record was last updated. Many ORMs can handle this automatically.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- existingProblem.CreatedAt = time.Now()
+ // If you add an UpdatedAt field to your Problem struct, you can update it here:
+ // existingProblem.UpdatedAt = time.Now()Also, ensure that your Problem struct in the database schema includes an UpdatedAt field if you want to track update times:
type Problem struct {
// ... other fields ...
CreatedAt time.Time
UpdatedAt time.Time
}Many ORMs, including GORM, can automatically handle UpdatedAt fields without explicit assignment in your code.
| package problem | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "Akuma/database1" | ||
| "Akuma/database2" | ||
| "errors" | ||
| "github.com/gin-gonic/gin" | ||
| "gorm.io/gorm" | ||
| "net/http" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the User struct import and usage.
The User struct is imported from both Akuma/database1 and Akuma/database2, but it's used without a package qualifier in the code. This creates ambiguity about which User struct is being referenced.
To resolve this, either:
- Specify the package name when using
User(e.g.,database1.Userordatabase2.User), or - Use import aliases to clearly distinguish between them:
import (
db1 "Akuma/database1"
db2 "Akuma/database2"
// ... other imports
)Then use db1.User or db2.User as appropriate throughout the code.
| var user User | ||
| database1.DB.Where("name=?", username).First(&user) | ||
| if user.Role == "admin" { | ||
|
|
||
| var problem Problem | ||
| if err := database2.DB.Where("id=?", questionId.QuestionId).First(&problem).Error; err != nil { | ||
| if errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound) { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "问题未找到。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "查询错误。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if err := database2.DB.Delete(&problem).Error; err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "删除问题失败。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ | ||
| "message": "问题已成功删除。", | ||
| }) | ||
| } else { | ||
| var problem Problem | ||
| if err := database2.DB.Where("id=?", questionId.QuestionId).First(&problem).Error; err != nil { | ||
| if errors.Is(err, gorm.ErrRecordNotFound) { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "问题未找到。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "查询错误。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if user.ID != problem.UserID { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "你没有权限删除别人的问题。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if err := database2.DB.Delete(&problem).Error; err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "删除问题失败。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| c.JSON(http.StatusOK, gin.H{ | ||
| "message": "问题已成功删除。", | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to reduce code duplication.
The admin and non-admin cases share significant code, leading to duplication. Consider refactoring to improve maintainability.
Here's a suggested refactoring approach:
- Extract the problem querying logic into a separate function.
- Extract the problem deletion logic into a separate function.
- Use these functions in both admin and non-admin cases.
Example:
func getProblem(id int) (*Problem, error) {
var problem Problem
err := database2.DB.Where("id=?", id).First(&problem).Error
return &problem, err
}
func deleteProblem(problem *Problem) error {
return database2.DB.Delete(problem).Error
}
// In DeleteProblem function
problem, err := getProblem(questionId.ID)
if err != nil {
// Handle error (existing error handling code)
}
// Permission check (different for admin and non-admin)
err = deleteProblem(problem)
if err != nil {
// Handle error (existing error handling code)
}
// Success responseThis refactoring will make the code more maintainable and easier to read.
| var user User | ||
| database1.DB.Where("name=?", username).First(&user) | ||
| if user.Role == "admin" { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add password verification for enhanced security.
As noted in a previous review, the function doesn't verify the user's password, which could lead to unauthorized deletions if an admin's username is known.
Add password verification before proceeding with the deletion:
var user User
if err := database1.DB.Where("name=?", username).First(&user).Error; err != nil {
c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "用户不存在"})
return
}
// Add password verification
if !verifyPassword(user.Password, providedPassword) {
c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{"error": "密码错误"})
return
}
// Rest of the function...Implement the verifyPassword function to securely compare the stored password with the provided one. This adds an extra layer of security to the deletion process.
| func DeleteProblem(c *gin.Context) { | ||
| username, exist := c.Get("user_name") | ||
| if !exist { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "无法获取用户身份", | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing return statement after error response.
When the username doesn't exist in the context, the function sets an error response but doesn't return, potentially leading to further execution.
Add a return statement after the error response:
if !exist {
c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{
"error": "无法获取用户身份",
})
+ return
}This ensures that the function stops execution after sending the error response.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| func DeleteProblem(c *gin.Context) { | |
| username, exist := c.Get("user_name") | |
| if !exist { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "无法获取用户身份", | |
| }) | |
| } | |
| func DeleteProblem(c *gin.Context) { | |
| username, exist := c.Get("user_name") | |
| if !exist { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusUnauthorized, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "无法获取用户身份", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } |
| var questionId questionId | ||
|
|
||
| if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&questionId); err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "输入无效，请检查您的数据。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Define the questionId struct before using it
The variable questionId is being used, but its type questionId is not defined in the code. This will lead to compilation errors. Ensure that you define the questionId struct before using it.
Define the questionId struct as follows:
type questionId struct {
QuestionID uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"`
}This struct should be placed outside the function, preferably near your other type definitions.
| var questionId questionId | ||
|
|
||
| if err := c.ShouldBindJSON(&questionId); err != nil { | ||
| c.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, gin.H{ | ||
| "error": "输入无效，请检查您的数据。", | ||
| }) | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Define the questionId struct before using it
Similar to the previous function, questionId is used without a defined type. This will cause compilation errors. Please define the questionId struct.
Define the questionId struct as follows:
type questionId struct {
QuestionID uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"`
}Place this definition outside the function for proper scope.
| QuestionId uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"` | ||
| UserID uint `json:"user_id"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use consistent naming for 'ID' in struct fields
In Go, it's conventional to use 'ID' instead of 'Id' for naming fields. The struct Submission uses both QuestionId and UserID. For consistency and clarity, consider renaming QuestionId to QuestionID.
Apply this diff to update the field name:
type Submission struct {
ID uint `gorm:"primaryKey" json:"id"`
- QuestionId uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"`
+ QuestionID uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"`
UserID uint `json:"user_id"`
Submit string `json:"submit" binding:"required"`
CreatedAt time.Time `json:"created_at"`
}Remember to update all occurrences of QuestionId in your codebase to QuestionID.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| QuestionId uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"` | |
| UserID uint `json:"user_id"` | |
| QuestionID uint `json:"question_id" binding:"required"` | |
| UserID uint `json:"user_id"` |
| database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionId).Find(&sub) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle errors from the database query
When querying the database using Find, it's important to check for possible errors to ensure robust error handling.
Modify the code to handle the error:
var sub []Submission
-database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionID).Find(&sub)
+if err := database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionID).Find(&sub).Error; err != nil {
+ c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{
+ "error": "数据库查询错误。",
+ })
+ return
+}This change ensures that any errors during the database operation are properly caught and handled.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionId).Find(&sub) | |
| var sub []Submission | |
| if err := database2.DB.Where("question_id = ?", questionId.QuestionID).Find(&sub).Error; err != nil { | |
| c.JSON(http.StatusInternalServerError, gin.H{ | |
| "error": "数据库查询错误。", | |
| }) | |
| return | |
| } |
feat: finish task
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes