TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe #62

jakirkham · 2016-09-13T01:03:09Z

Please unsubscribe from this PR - it is a testing branch and will be noisy.

This adds a second good recipe called ok_recipe as a PR to the good_recipe branch. It does not have the good_recipe in its history though. Thus it should be useful for testing cases where recipes in only the base branch should be excluded or not.

pelson · 2016-09-13T02:01:47Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2016-11-26T04:05:52Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2017-09-21T15:26:50Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The recipe must have some tests.

pelson · 2017-09-22T03:38:42Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2018-08-10T14:53:06Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
The recipe must have some tests.
The recipe must have a build/number section.
Recipe name has invalid characters. only lowercase alpha, numeric, underscores, hyphens and dots allowed
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

djsutherland · 2018-08-10T15:05:43Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

djsutherland · 2018-08-10T16:47:45Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The home item is expected in the about section.
The license item is expected in the about section.
The summary item is expected in the about section.
The recipe could do with some maintainers listed in the extra/recipe-maintainers section.
The recipe must have some tests.
The recipe must have a build/number section.
Recipe name has invalid characters. only lowercase alpha, numeric, underscores, hyphens and dots allowed
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "package" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "build" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "test" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "about" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.
The "extra" section was expected to be a dictionary, but got a CommentedMap.

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Recipe with the same name exists in bioconda: please discuss with @conda-forge/bioconda-recipes.

pelson · 2018-08-10T17:13:58Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2019-07-22T19:09:08Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

license_file entry is missing, but is expected.

pelson · 2019-09-04T20:01:53Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

beckermr · 2020-03-01T13:19:47Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2020-03-19T12:14:18Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint . from the recipe directory.

pelson · 2020-03-19T14:14:59Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or Other) nor an SPDX license expression.

pelson · 2020-03-19T14:24:09Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

pelson · 2020-08-11T22:07:45Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Please do not delete the example recipe found in (recipes/example/meta.yaml)

pelson · 2020-08-14T17:07:27Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/ok_recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/ok_recipe:

Please do not delete the example recipe found in recipes/example/meta.yaml.

pelson · 2020-08-18T20:25:34Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I was trying to look for recipes to lint for you, but it appears we have a merge conflict.
Please try to merge or rebase with the base branch to resolve this conflict.

Please ping the 'conda-forge/core' team (using the @ notation in a comment) if you believe this is a bug.

pelson · 2020-08-18T21:10:21Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

beckermr · 2020-08-18T22:09:31Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-linter · 2020-11-02T17:55:10Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2021-08-24T05:08:12Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2023-01-06T12:21:09Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-07-16T14:29:22Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-07-16T14:55:14Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-07-17T06:17:50Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

github-actions · 2024-09-20T10:39:15Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

The recipe must have some tests.

GHA4lyfe

github-actions · 2024-09-20T10:51:01Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-21T12:18:05Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-21T20:13:12Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-23T09:55:08Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-23T11:22:24Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-23T11:52:56Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-23T12:06:50Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-23T12:16:32Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-24T20:03:19Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-28T04:08:50Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-28T06:41:58Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-curator · 2024-09-29T22:21:26Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.
I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-admin · 2024-10-01T21:33:05Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I Failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy
bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint --conda-forge . from the recipe directory.

_{This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/11133787792.}

conda-forge-admin · 2024-10-01T21:46:42Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/blah/meta.yaml, recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.
I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-admin · 2024-11-01T16:16:34Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint --conda-forge . from the recipe directory.

_{This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/11632692791.}

conda-forge-admin · 2024-11-01T16:36:35Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.
I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

conda-forge-admin · 2024-11-02T12:07:21Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I failed to even lint the recipe, probably because of a conda-smithy bug 😢. This likely indicates a problem in your meta.yaml, though. To get a traceback to help figure out what's going on, install conda-smithy and run conda smithy recipe-lint --conda-forge . from the recipe directory.

_{This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/11642533153.}

conda-forge-admin · 2024-11-02T12:17:04Z

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml, recipe/blah/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

I do have some suggestions for making it better though...

For recipe/blah/meta.yaml:

ℹ️ License is not an SPDX identifier (or a custom LicenseRef) nor an SPDX license expression.

Documentation on acceptable licenses can be found here.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/11957448081. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

Added an ok recipe.

496b0d7

jakirkham changed the title ~~TESTING BRANCH: Added an ok recipe (without good recipe)~~ TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe Sep 13, 2016

jakirkham mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2017

Run new conda_forge lints #98

Merged

Update meta.yaml

ccb2d85

Update meta.yaml

7e2a4d5

beckermr added 2 commits March 19, 2020 09:16

Update meta.yaml

2c2472e

Update meta.yaml

6c0e671

Rename recipes/ok_recipe/meta.yaml to recipe/meta.yaml

b436a55

beckermr changed the base branch from good_branch to good_branch_beside August 18, 2020 20:44

Create blah_blah.yaml

cba3224

Create meta.yaml

8bf0c35

Update meta.yaml

117c7c0

TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe #62

Are you sure you want to change the base?

TESTING BRANCH: Added ok recipe beside good recipe #62

Conversation

jakirkham commented Sep 13, 2016

pelson commented Sep 13, 2016

pelson commented Nov 26, 2016

pelson commented Sep 21, 2017

pelson commented Sep 22, 2017

pelson commented Aug 10, 2018

djsutherland commented Aug 10, 2018

djsutherland commented Aug 10, 2018

pelson commented Aug 10, 2018

pelson commented Jul 22, 2019

pelson commented Sep 4, 2019

beckermr commented Mar 1, 2020

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

pelson commented Mar 19, 2020

pelson commented Aug 11, 2020

pelson commented Aug 14, 2020

pelson commented Aug 18, 2020

pelson commented Aug 18, 2020

beckermr commented Aug 18, 2020

conda-forge-linter commented Nov 2, 2020

conda-forge-curator bot commented Aug 24, 2021

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jan 6, 2023

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jul 16, 2024

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jul 16, 2024

conda-forge-curator bot commented Jul 17, 2024

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2024

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2024 • edited Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 21, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 21, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 24, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 28, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 28, 2024 • edited by github-actions bot Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 29, 2024 • edited by conda-forge-admin Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Oct 1, 2024

conda-forge-admin commented Oct 1, 2024 • edited Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 1, 2024 • edited Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 1, 2024 • edited Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 2, 2024

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 2, 2024 • edited Loading

github-actions bot commented Sep 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 21, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 21, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 23, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 24, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 28, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 28, 2024 •

edited by github-actions bot

Loading

conda-forge-curator bot commented Sep 29, 2024 •

edited by conda-forge-admin

Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Oct 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 1, 2024 •

edited

Loading

conda-forge-admin commented Nov 2, 2024 •

edited

Loading