Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed Events Directory #1298

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024
Merged

Removed Events Directory #1298

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 26, 2024

Conversation

eddie-knight
Copy link
Collaborator

@eddie-knight eddie-knight commented Jun 25, 2024

Part of #1257 — Conceptualized in collaboration with @mrcdb and @brandtkeller.

The options we considered were as follows:

  1. Move events to the top-level directory to enable blog-style formatting
  2. Keep the events subdir in the community dir, but move them using the makefile to enable blog-style formatting
  3. Stop tracking events in the main repo, instead relying on the blog for announcement
  4. Stop trying to achieve the blog-style format and just track them in markdown pages

At the recommendation of @mrcdb, I've made this PR to implement option 3. @brandtkeller has volunteered to help create blog guidelines in a follow-up PR.

(Marco and Brandt, please comment to confirm that I've captured this correctly).

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Deploy Preview for tag-security ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 113800a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/tag-security/deploys/667c31eb3cddad000898d8b4
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1298--tag-security.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@brandtkeller
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussed the placement of recurring meetings in the README.md and removal of duplicate entries. Moving to placement and announcement of point-in-time events in a blog serves a greater purpose of utilizing the blog.

Agree on the creation of guidelines for the blog, and will propose potential opportunities for the production of content for the blog in the next Security TAG meeting.

brandtkeller

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@mrcdb
Copy link
Member

mrcdb commented Jun 26, 2024

@eddie-knight you got the options right 👍 I confirm that option 3 makes the most sense to me as I don't see a huge impact in tracking future events in the blog area (also, few of the current blog entries are effectively about past events anyway).

Copy link
Collaborator

@mnm678 mnm678 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good except the linter error. It looks like the link error is not created by this pr.

@eddie-knight
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mnm678 I went ahead and added the linter fixes to this PR

@anvega
Copy link
Contributor

anvega commented Jun 26, 2024

It would be nice to keep the past events file in an archive directory, even if not shown on the site.

There is a lot of fun history here that otherwise the record would be lost.

@eddie-knight
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Good idea, I'll put up a change shortly

@eddie-knight
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've added a blog post with the links to past talks. This can always change in the future, but it seemed like a good interim place to save the content.

@anvega let me know if I missed anything.

Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eddie Knight <[email protected]>
@jkjell jkjell merged commit cf96a87 into cncf:main Jun 26, 2024
10 checks passed
@eddie-knight eddie-knight deleted the website-events branch August 14, 2024 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants