Skip to content
/ model-res-avm Public

Automated valuation model for all class 200 residential properties in Cook County (except vacant land and condos)

License

AGPL-3.0 license
28 stars 5 forks Branches Tags Activity
Star
Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ccao-data/model-res-avm

BranchesTags

Repository files navigation

Table of Contents

Prior Models

This repository contains code, data, and documentation for the Cook County Assessor’s residential reassessment model. Information about prior year models can be found at the following links:

Year(s) Triad(s) Method Language / Framework Link
2009 - 2017 All Linear regression per township SPSS Link
2018 City Linear regression per township N/A Not available. Values provided by vendor
2019 North Linear regression or GBM model per township R (Base) Link
2020 South Linear regression or GBM model per township R (Base) Link
2021 City County-wide LightGBM model R (Tidyverse / Tidymodels) Link
2022 North County-wide LightGBM model R (Tidyverse / Tidymodels) Link
2023 South County-wide LightGBM model R (Tidyverse / Tidymodels) Link
2024 City County-wide LightGBM model R (Tidyverse / Tidymodels) Link

Model Overview

The duty of the Cook County Assessor’s Office is to value property in a fair, accurate, and transparent way. The Assessor is committed to transparency throughout the assessment process. As such, this document contains:

The repository itself contains the code for the Automated Valuation Model (AVM) used to generate initial assessed values for single- and multi-family residential properties in Cook County. This system is effectively an advanced machine learning model (hereafter referred to as “the model”). It uses previous sales to generate estimated sale values (assessments) for all properties.

How It Works

The ultimate goal of the model is to answer the question, “What would the sale price of every Cook County home be if it had sold last year?”

To answer this question, the model estimates the sale price (fair market value) of unsold properties using the known sale price of similar and nearby properties. Training the model involves iteratively updating a mathematical function to recognize patterns in sales data, which includes both property characteristics (such as square footage, number of bedrooms, etc.) and additional factors such as location, environmental variables (flood risk, noise), and market trends.

The full residential modeling pipeline - from raw data to final values - consists of 7 stages. Visually, the pipeline looks approximately like the flowchart below.

graph LR
    aws[("AWS")]
    ingest("Ingest")
    train("Train")
    assess("Assess")
    evaluate("Evaluate")
    interpret("Interpret")
    finalize("Finalize")
    upload("Upload")
    export("Export")

    ingest --> train
    train --> assess
    train --> interpret
    assess --> evaluate
    evaluate --> finalize
    interpret --> finalize
    finalize --> upload
    finalize --> export
    upload --> aws
    aws --> ingest
    aws --> export
Loading

All inputs and outputs are stored on AWS S3 using a unique run identifier. Each stage in the modeling pipeline corresponds to an individual R script. These scripts can be run independently (as a stand-alone script) or as part of the overall pipeline (with DVC) as long as the dependencies for the stage exist.

⚠️ NOTE: For a full technical breakdown of each stage, including dependencies, outputs, parameters, and more, see dvc.yaml

  1. Ingest: Pull prepared data from the CCAO’s Athena database. This data is divided into 2 primary datasets, one for training and one for assessment. NOTE: This stage is only run as-needed, since the input data does not change for each model run.

  2. Train: Train the model using sales data. This involves splitting the input data into train/test sets and performing cross-validation to determine the optimal set of hyperparameters. The primary output of this stage is a trained model object.

  3. Assess: Use the trained model to estimate values for all residential properties. Values are adjusted if necessary and then aggregated to the PIN level. The primary output of this stage is a data frame of PIN-level assessed values.

  4. Evaluate: Measure the performance of the model using the held-out test set and an assessor-specific ratio study method. Performance statistics include standard machine learning metrics (RMSE, MAE, MAPE) as well as assessor-specific metrics (COD, PRD, PRB, MKI). This stage calculates metrics for different levels of geography with (and without) property class breakouts. The primary output of this stage is a data frame of aggregate performance statistics.

  5. Interpret: Calculate three major explanatory outputs:

    • SHAP values for all the estimated values from the assess stage. These are the per feature contribution to the predicted value for an individual observation (usually a single PIN)
    • Aggregate feature importance for the entire model, using the built-in LightGBM method
    • An experimental set of comparable property sales, based loosely on the method described in this vignette

  6. Finalize: Save run timings and metadata. Render the following Quarto documents:

    • An overall model report detailing model performance, effects, and quality control tests
    • For PINs of interest, individual PIN-level reports detailing the characteristics, SHAP values, and results for a given PIN

  7. Upload: Upload all output objects to AWS (S3). All model outputs for every model run are stored in perpetuity in S3. Each run’s performance can be visualized using the CCAO’s internal Tableau dashboards. NOTE: This stage is only run internally, since it requires access to the CCAO Data AWS account.

  8. Export: Export assessed values to Desk Review spreadsheets for Valuations, as well as a delimited text format for upload to the system of record (iasWorld). NOTE: This stage is only run when a final model is selected. It is not run automatically or as part of the main pipeline.

Choices Made

Despite its reputation as an easy-to-use panacea, machine learning actually involves a number of choices and trade-offs which are not always transparent or well-justified. Seemingly inane decisions by algorithm creators and data scientists can introduce systemic bias into results.

To counter this, we’ve listed the major choices we’ve made about our modeling process below, as well as the rationale behind each decision. We feel strongly that these choices lead to optimal results given the trade-offs involved, but we’re absolutely open to suggestions and criticism.

Model Selection

We use LightGBM for our primary valuation model. LightGBM is a GBDT (gradient-boosting decision tree) framework created and maintained by Microsoft. It has an excellent R API and has been around since 2016.

We tried a number of other model types and frameworks, including regularized linear models, XGBoost, CatBoost, random forest, shallow neural networks, and support vector machines. We even tried ensemble methods such as model stacking. We chose LightGBM because it has the right mix of trade-offs for our needs. Specifically, LightGBM is:

  • Well-documented. The docs contain good explanations of LightGBM’s features and useful troubleshooting sections.
  • Highly accurate. It consistently beat other methods in accuracy, as measured by RMSE (root mean squared error) using a test set.
  • Extremely fast. It trained faster than other model types by a nearly 2:1 margin using our data (CPU training only).
  • Capable of natively handling categorical features. This is extremely important as a large amount of our property data is categorical (type of roof, neighborhood, etc.). Other methods, such as XGBoost, require feature transformation such as one-hot encoding to use categorical data.
  • Widely used in housing-specific machine learning models and competitions.
  • Simpler to use and implement than ensemble methods or neural networks, which can involve lots of fiddling and configuration.
  • Easy to diagnose problems with, as it has built-in feature importance and contribution methods.

The downsides of LightGBM are that it is:

  • Relatively difficult to explain compared to simpler models such as linear regression.
  • Not particularly well-integrated into Tidymodels, the R framework we use for machine learning. See Framework Selection.
  • Painful to train, since it has a large number of hyperparameters.
  • Prone to over-fitting if not trained carefully, unlike other methods such as random forest.

For a more in-depth report on the performance and accuracy trade-offs between LightGBM and XGBoost specific to our use case, please see our Model Benchmark repository.

Framework Selection

We use Tidymodels as our primary machine-learning framework. Tidymodels is a set of R packages that work well together and with the Tidyverse. These packages abstract away complicated machine-learning logic and allow us to focus on improving our data and models.

Additionally, Tidymodels is:

  • Well-documented. There are resources for quickly learning the Tidymodels approach as well as complete documentation for each Tidymodels package.
  • Under very active development. Developers are quick to respond to issues and feature requests.
  • Quick to teach, since a lot of complicated code is abstracted away.
  • Extensible. The API allows for easy integration of additional model types. See Lightsnip.
  • Verbose. It tends to warn you about common machine-learning footguns and has excellent error handling and messages.

Some downsides to Tidymodels are that it is:

  • Relatively new. While its API is mature, there are still bugs in core packages.
  • Under active development. Packages and features change fairly quickly, so we need to constantly update code to stay current.
Lightsnip

We’ve create a custom R package called Lightsnip to better integrate LightGBM with Tidymodels and unlock some of its more advanced features, including:

  • Early stopping, which reduces training time by stopping based on a holdout validation set
  • Additional hyperparameters, particularly those related to categorical features
  • The ability to link certain hyperparameters which typically move in tandem, such as num_leaves and max_depth

Lightsnip also ensures that the link between the model engine (LightGBM) and the model framework (Tidymodels) is stable. It lets us quickly respond to any upstream changes while maintaining the set of features we need.

Hyperparameter Selection

Hyperparameters define the structure and trade-offs of models. They must be well-specified in order for a model to be accurate and useful. LightGBM has a large number of tunable parameters, but we tune only a small proportion, including:

LightGBM Parameter CV Search Range Parameter Description
num_iterations 100 - 2500 Total number of trees/iterations. Final value is dependent on CV and early stopping.
learning_rate 0.001 - 0.398 Speed of training per iteration. Higher usually means faster convergence, but possibly higher overall error.
max_bin 50 - 512 Maximum number of bins used to bucket continuous features
num_leaves 32 - 2048 Maximum number of leaves in each tree. Main parameter to control model complexity.
add_to_linked_depth 1 - 7 Amount to add to max_depth if linked to num_leaves. See max_depth.
feature_fraction 0.3 - 0.7 The random subset of features selected for a tree, as a percentage.
min_gain_to_split 0.001 - 10000 The minimum gain needed to create a split.
min_data_in_leaf 2 - 400 The minimum data in a single tree leaf. Important to prevent over-fitting.
max_cat_threshold 10 - 250 Maximum number of split points for categorical features
min_data_per_group 2 - 400 Minimum number of observations per categorical group
cat_smooth 10 - 200 Categorical smoothing. Used to reduce noise.
cat_l2 0.001 - 100 Categorical-specific L2 regularization
lambda_l1 0.001 - 100 L1 regularization
lambda_l2 0.001 - 100 L2 regularization

These parameters are tuned using Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, which iteratively searches the parameter space based on the previous parameter tuning results. We use Bayesian tuning instead of grid search or random search because it trains faster and results in nearly identical final parameters.

Model accuracy for each parameter combination is measured on a validation set using rolling-origin cross-validation. Final model accuracy is measured on a test set of the most recent 10% of sales in our training sample. For final model candidates, we also measure model accuracy on a random (rather than time-based) test set to ensure the model generalizes well.

Features Used

The residential model uses a variety of individual and aggregate features to determine a property’s assessed value. We’ve tested a long list of possible features over time, including walk score, crime rate, school districts, and many others. The features in the table below are the ones that made the cut. They’re the right combination of easy to understand and impute, powerfully predictive, and well-behaved. Most of them are in use in the model as of 2024-04-12.

Feature Name Category Type Possible Values Notes
Percent Population Age, Under 19 Years Old ACS5 numeric Percent of the people 17 years or younger
Percent Population Age, Over 65 Years Old ACS5 numeric Percent of the people 65 years or older
Median Population Age ACS5 numeric Median age for whole population
Percent Population Mobility, In Same House 1 Year Ago ACS5 numeric Percent of people (older than 1 year) who have not moved in the past 12 months
Percent Population Mobility, Moved From Other State in Past Year ACS5 numeric Percent of people (older than 1 year) who moved from another state in the past 12 months
Percent Households Family, Married ACS5 numeric Percent of households that are family, married
Percent Households Nonfamily, Living Alone ACS5 numeric Percent of households that are non-family, alone (single)
Percent Population Education, High School Degree ACS5 numeric Percent of people older than 25 who attained a high school degree
Percent Population Education, Bachelor Degree ACS5 numeric Percent of people older than 25 who attained a bachelor’s degree
Percent Population Education, Graduate Degree ACS5 numeric Percent of people older than 25 who attained a graduate degree
Percent Population Income, Below Poverty Level ACS5 numeric Percent of people above the poverty level in the last 12 months
Median Income, Household in Past Year ACS5 numeric Median income per household in the past 12 months
Median Income, Per Capita in Past Year ACS5 numeric Median income per capita in the past 12 months
Percent Population Income, Received SNAP in Past Year ACS5 numeric Percent of households that received SNAP in the past 12 months
Percent Population Employment, Unemployed ACS5 numeric Percent of people 16 years and older unemployed
Median Occupied Household, Total, Year Built ACS5 numeric Median year built for all occupied households
Median Occupied Household, Renter, Gross Rent ACS5 numeric Median gross rent for only renter-occupied units
Percent Occupied Households, Owner ACS5 numeric Percent of households that are owner-occupied
Percent Occupied Households, Total, One or More Selected Conditions ACS5 numeric Percent of occupied households with selected conditions
Percent Population Mobility, Moved From Within Same County in Past Year ACS5 numeric Percent of people (older than 1 year) who moved in county in the past 12 months
Year Built Characteristic numeric Year the property was constructed
Central Air Conditioning Characteristic categorical Central A/C, No Central A/C Indicator for central air
Apartments Characteristic categorical Two, Three, Four, Five, Six, None Number of apartments for class 211 and 212 properties
Attic Finish Characteristic categorical Living Area, Partial, None Attic finish
Attic Type Characteristic categorical Full, Partial, None Attic type
Bedrooms Characteristic numeric Number of bedrooms in the building
Building Square Feet Characteristic numeric Square footage of the building, as measured from the exterior
Basement Type Characteristic categorical Full, Slab, Partial, Crawl Basement type
Basement Finish Characteristic categorical Formal Rec Room, Apartment, Unfinished Basement finish
Exterior Wall Material Characteristic categorical Frame, Masonry, Frame + Masonry, Stucco Exterior wall construction
Full Baths Characteristic numeric Number of full bathrooms
Fireplaces Characteristic numeric Number of fireplaces
Garage 1 Attached Characteristic categorical Yes, No Indicator for garage attached
Garage 1 Ext. Wall Material Characteristic categorical Frame, Masonry, Frame + Masonry, Stucco Garage exterior wall construction
Garage 1 Size Characteristic categorical 1 cars, 1.5 cars, 2 cars, 2.5 cars, 3 cars, 3.5 cars, 0 cars, 4 cars Garage size (number of cars)
Half Baths Characteristic numeric Number of half baths
Land Square Feet Characteristic numeric Square footage of the land (not just the building) of the property
Central Heating Characteristic categorical Warm Air Furnace, Hot Water Steam, Electric Heater, None Interior heating type
Number of Commercial Units Characteristic numeric Number of commercial units
Porch Characteristic categorical None, Frame Enclosed, Masonry Enclosed Porch type
Roof Material Characteristic categorical Shingle + Asphalt, Tar + Gravel, Slate, Shake, Tile, Other Roof material / construction
Rooms Characteristic numeric Number of total rooms in the building (excluding baths)
Cathedral Ceiling Characteristic categorical Yes, No Deprecated
Type of Residence Characteristic categorical 1 Story, 2 Story, 3 Story +, Split Level, 1.5 Story, Missing Type of residence
Recent Renovation Characteristic logical Indicates whether or not a property was renovated within the last 3 years
Property Class Characteristic character Card-level property type and/or use
Longitude Location numeric X coordinate in degrees (global longitude)
Latitude Location numeric Y coordinate in degrees (global latitude)
Census Tract GEOID Location character 11-digit ACS/Census tract GEOID
First Street Factor Location numeric First Street flood factor The flood factor is a risk score, where 10 is the highest risk and 1 is the lowest risk
School Elementary District GEOID Location character School district (elementary) GEOID
School Secondary District GEOID Location character School district (secondary) GEOID
Municipality Name Location character Taxing district name, as seen on Cook County tax bills
CMAP Walkability Score (No Transit) Location numeric CMAP walkability score for a given PIN, excluding transit walkability
CMAP Walkability Total Score Location numeric CMAP walkability score for a given PIN, including transit walkability
Airport Noise DNL Location numeric O’Hare and Midway noise, measured as DNL
Township Code Meta character Cook County township code
Neighborhood Code Meta character Assessor neighborhood code
Number of sales within previous N years of sale/lien date Meta numeric Number of sales within previous N years of sale/lien date
Property Tax Bill Aggregate Rate Other numeric Tax bill rate for the taxing district containing a given PIN
School District (Elementary) GreatSchools Rating Other numeric Average GreatSchools rating of elementary schools within the district of a given PIN
School District (Secondary) GreatSchools Rating Other numeric Average GreatSchools rating of secondary schools within the district of a given PIN
Corner Lot Other logical Corner lot indicator
Active Homeowner Exemption Other logical Parcel has an active homeowner exemption
Number of Years Active Homeowner Exemption Other numeric Number of years parcel has had an active homeowner exemption
Number of PINs in Half Mile Proximity numeric Number of PINs within half mile
Number of Bus Stops in Half Mile Proximity numeric Number of bus stops within half mile
Number of Foreclosures Per 1000 PINs (Past 5 Years) Proximity numeric Number of foreclosures per 1000 PINs, within half mile (past 5 years)
Number of Schools in Half Mile Proximity numeric Number of schools (any kind) within half mile
Number of Schools with Rating in Half Mile Proximity numeric Number of schools (any kind) within half mile
Average School Rating in Half Mile Proximity numeric Average school rating of schools within half mile
Nearest Bike Trail Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest bike trail distance (feet)
Nearest Cemetery Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest cemetery distance (feet)
Nearest CTA Route Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest CTA route distance (feet)
Nearest CTA Stop Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest CTA stop distance (feet)
Nearest Hospital Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest hospital distance (feet)
Lake Michigan Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Distance to Lake Michigan shoreline (feet)
Nearest Major Road Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest major road distance (feet)
Nearest Metra Route Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest Metra route distance (feet)
Nearest Metra Stop Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest Metra stop distance (feet)
Nearest Park Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest park distance (feet)
Nearest Railroad Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest railroad distance (feet)
Nearest Secondary Road Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest secondary road distance (feet)
Nearest University Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest university distance (feet)
Nearest Vacant Land Parcel Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest vacant land (class 100) parcel distance (feet)
Nearest Water Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest water distance (feet)
Nearest Golf Course Distance (Feet) Proximity numeric Nearest golf course distance (feet)
Total Airport Noise DNL Proximity numeric Estimated DNL for a PIN, assuming a baseline DNL of 50 (“quiet suburban”) and adding predicted noise from O’Hare and Midway airports to that baseline
Sale Year Time numeric Sale year calculated as the number of years since 0 B.C.E
Sale Day Time numeric Sale day calculated as the number of days since January 1st, 1997
Sale Quarter of Year Time character Character encoding of quarter of year (Q1 - Q4)
Sale Month of Year Time character Character encoding of month of year (Jan - Dec)
Sale Day of Year Time numeric Numeric encoding of day of year (1 - 365)
Sale Day of Month Time numeric Numeric encoding of day of month (1 - 31)
Sale Day of Week Time numeric Numeric encoding of day of week (1 - 7)
Sale After COVID-19 Time logical Indicator for whether sale occurred after COVID-19 was widely publicized (around March 15, 2020)

Data Sources

We rely on numerous third-party sources to add new features to our data. These features are used in the primary valuation model and thus need to be high-quality and error-free. A non-exhaustive list of features and their respective sources includes:

Feature Data Source
Tax rate Cook County Clerk’s Office
Airport noise Noise monitoring stations via the Chicago Department of Aviation
Road proximity Buffering OpenStreetMap motorway, trunk, and primary roads
Flood risk and direction First Street flood data
All Census features ACS 5-year estimates for each respective year
Elementary school district or attendance boundary Cook County school district boundaries and CPS attendance boundaries
High school district or attendance boundary Cook County high school district boundaries and CPS high school attendance boundaries
Walkability The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s ON TO 2050 Walkability Scores
Subdivision, unincorporated areas, SSAs, etc. Cook County GIS
PUMA Housing Index DePaul Institute for Housing Studies
School Ratings GreatSchools.org, aggregated to the district level
Distance to CTA, PACE, Metra Each agency’s respective GTFS feed, which contains the location of stops and lines

Features Excluded

Many people have intuitive assumptions about what drives the value of their home, so we often receive the question, “Is X taken into account when valuing my property?” Here’s a list of commonly-asked-about features which are not in the model, as well as rationale for why they’re excluded:

Feature Reason It’s Excluded
Property condition We track property condition, but over 98% of the properties in our data have the same condition, meaning it’s not tracked effectively and there’s not enough variation for it to be predictive of sale price.
Crime Crime is highly correlated with features that are already in the model, such as income and neighborhood, so it doesn’t add much predictive power. Additionally, it is difficult to reliably aggregate crime data from all of Cook County.
Interior features such as kitchen quality or amenities Our office can only access the outside of buildings; we can’t reliably observe interior property characteristics beyond what is available through building permits.
Blighted building or eyesore in my neighborhood If a specific building or thing affects sale prices in your neighborhood, this will already be reflected in the model through neighborhood fixed effects.
Pictures of property We don’t have a way to reliably use image data in our model, but we may include such features in the future.
Comparable properties The model will automatically find and use comparable properties when producing an estimate. However, the model does not explicitly use or produce a set of comparable properties.
Flood indicator Between the First Street flood risk and direction data, distance to water, and precise latitude and longitude for each parcel, the contribution of FEMA flood hazard data to the model approached zero.

Data Used

The model uses two primary data sets that are constructed by the ingest stage, as well as a few secondary data sets for valuation. These data sets are included in the input/ directory for the purpose of replication.

Primary Data

  • training_data - Includes residential sales from the 9 years prior to the next assessment date, which gives us a sufficient amount of data for accurate prediction without including outdated price information. This is the data used to train and evaluate the model. Its approximate size is 400K rows with 100 features.
  • assessment_data - Includes all residential properties (sold and unsold) which need assessed values. This is the data the final model is used on. Its approximate size is 1.1 million rows with 100 features.

These data sets contain only residential single- and multi-family properties. Single-family includes property classes 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 234, 278, and 295. Multi-family includes property classes 211 and 212. Bed and breakfast properties (class 218 and 219) are considered single-family for the sake of modeling, but are typically valued later by hand. Other residential properties, such as condominiums (class 299 and 399) are valued using a different model.

Using training_data

Models need data in order to be trained and measured for accuracy. Modern predictive modeling typically uses three data sets:

  1. A training set, used to train the parameters of the model itself.
  2. A validation set, used to choose a hyperparameter combination that optimizes model accuracy.
  3. A test set, used to measure the performance of the trained, tuned model on unseen data.

training_data is used to create these data sets. It is subdivided using a technique called out-of-time testing.

Figure 1: Out-of-Time Testing

Out-of-time testing explicitly measures the model’s ability to predict recent sales. It holds out the most recent 10% of sales as a test set, while the remaining 90% of the data is split into training and validation sets.

Figure 2: Rolling-Origin Resampling

The training data is further subdivided using a technique called rolling-origin resampling. For this method, a fixed window of time is used to increment the size of the training set, while the validation set is always 10% of sales immediately following the training set. This helps cross-validation determine which hyperparameters will perform best when predicting future sales.

Figure 3: Final Training

Once we’re satisfied with the model’s performance on recent sales, we retrain the model using the full sales sample (all rows in training_data). This gives the final model more (and more recent) sales to learn from.

Using assessment_data

Finally, the model, trained on the full sales sample from training_data, can be used to predict assessed values for all residential properties. To do this, we set the “sale date” of all properties in assessment_data to Jan 1st of the assessment year, then use the final model to predict what the sale price would be on that date.

These sale prices are our initial prediction for what each property is worth. They eventually become the assessed value sent to taxpayers after some further adjustments (see Post-Modeling) and hand review.

Secondary Data

The pipeline also uses a few secondary data sets in the valuation process. These data sets are included in input/ but are not actually used by the model itself. They include:

  • char_data - The complete assessment_data set as well as the same data for the previous year. This data is used for automated model performance reporting rather than valuation.
  • complex_id_data - Complex identifiers for class 210 and 295 town/rowhomes. Intended to group like units together to ensure that nearly identical units in close proximity receive the same assessed value. This is accomplished with a “fuzzy grouping” strategy that allows slightly dissimilar characteristics.
  • hie_data - Home improvement exemption data used to evaluate whether the pipeline correctly updates card-level characteristics triggered by the expiration of home improvement exemptions.
  • land_site_rate_data - Fixed, PIN-level land values for class 210 and 295 units. Provided by the Valuations department. Not always used, so may be 0 rows for certain years.
  • land_nbhd_rate_data - Fixed $/sqft land rates by assessor neighborhood for residential property classes except 210 and 295. Provided by the Valuations department.

Representativeness

There’s a common saying in the machine learning world: “garbage in, garbage out.” This is a succinct way to say that training a predictive model with bad, unrepresentative, or biased data leads to bad results.

To help mitigate the bad data problem and ensure accurate prediction, we do our best to ensure that the sales data used to train the model is representative of the actual market and universe of properties. We accomplish this in two ways.

1. Sales Validation

We use a heuristics-based approach to drop non-arms-length sales, remove outliers, and manually flag certain suspect sales. This approach was developed in partnership with the Mansueto Institute. As of 2023, the sales validation code can be found in a dedicated repository at ccao-data/model-sales-val. Please visit that repository for more information.

2. Balance Tests

We also perform basic balance tests to determine if the universe of properties sold is analogous to the universe of all properties. The code for these tests can be found under reports/. The goal of the tests is to see if any characteristics are significantly predictive of sale status, and the tests generally take the form of a logistic regression with the following specification:

sold_in_last_2_years = β₀ + βₙcharacteristics + βₙlocation_fixed_effects + ... + ε

There a few caveats with this approach and with balance testing in general:

  1. There could be statistically significant omitted variables that differentiate sold from unsold. Things like recently_painted or full_kitchen_renovation are good examples. We don’t collect these data points, so it could be the case that sold properties are more “sale-ready” in these unknown terms.
  2. There could be significant variation by geography in the representativeness of the sales. In other words, certain areas could have non-representative sales whose predictive effect on sold_in_last_2_years is washed out due to mis- or under-specified geographic sampling.

Post-Modeling

In addition to the first-pass modeling done by LightGBM, the CCAO also performs a set of simple adjustments on the initial predicted values from the assess stage. These adjustments are internally called “post-modeling,” and are responsible for correcting minor deficiencies in the initial predictions. Specifically, post-modeling will:

  1. Aggregate values for multi-card properties to the PIN level, then disaggregate them back to the card level. A check is used to ensure that the PIN-level assessed value is not significantly greater than the prior year’s value. This is needed because often back buildings (ADUs, secondary buildings) will receive a much higher initial value than they are actually worth (since they are not differentiated as ADUs by the model).

  2. Ensure that nearly identical properties are identically valued. For some property classes, such as 210 and 295s, we manually adjust values such that all identical properties in the same complex receive the same predicted value. This is accomplished by replacing individual predicted values with the average predicted value for the complex.

  3. Round PIN-level values (typically to the nearest $1,000). This is done to indicate that model values are estimates, not precise values.

These adjustments have been collectively approved by the senior leadership of the CCAO. They are designed to limit the impact of data integrity issues, prevent regressivity in assessment, and ensure that people with nearly identical properties receive the same value.

Major Changes from Previous Versions

assessment-year-2021

This repository represents a significant departure from the old residential modeling codebase used to create assessed values in 2019 and 2020. As the CCAO’s Data department has grown, we’ve been able to dedicate more resources to building models, applications, and other tools. As a result, we’ve made the following major changes to the residential modeling codebase:

  • Reduced the size of the codebase substantially from around 16,000 lines of R code. This was accomplished by moving complicated data handling to our internal R package and abstracting away machine learning logic to Tidymodels.
  • Unified modeling for the entire county. Prior iterations of the residential model used individual models for each township. This was difficult to implement and track and performed worse than a single large model. The new model can value any residential property in the county, is significantly faster to train, and is much easier to replicate.
  • Split the residential codebase into separate models for single/multi-family and condominiums. Previously, these models were combined in the same scripts, leading to a lot of complications and unnecessary overhead. Separating them makes it much easier to understand and diagnose each model.
  • Switched to using LightGBM as our primary valuation model. LightGBM is essentially the most bleeding-edge machine learning framework widely available that isn’t a neural network. Prior to using LightGBM, we used linear models or R’s gbm package. Prior to 2018, the CCAO used linear models in SPSS for residential valuations.
  • Improved dependency management via renv. Previously, users trying replicate our model needed to manually install a list of needed R packages. By switching to renv, we’ve vastly reduced the effort needed to replicate our modeling environment, see the installation section below.

assessment-year-2022

  • Moved previously separate processes into this repository and improved their integration with the overall modeling process. For example, the etl_res_data process was moved to pipeline/00-ingest.R, while the process to finalize model values was moved to pipeline/07-export.R.
  • Added DVC support/integration. This repository uses DVC in 2 ways:
    1. All input data in input/ is versioned, tracked, and stored using DVC. Previous input data sets are stored in perpetuity on S3.
    2. DVC pipelines are used to sequentially run R pipeline scripts and track/cache inputs and outputs.
  • All model runs are now saved in perpetuity on S3. Each model’s outputs are saved as Parquet files which can be queried using Amazon Athena.
  • Offloaded model reporting entirely to Tableau. This repository no longer produces markdown-based model outcome reports.
  • Improved model accuracy significantly while reducing training time. This is largely due to the use of Lightsnip and the inclusion of many new features.
  • Added per feature, per property contributions via LightGBM’s built-in SHAP methods.
  • Reorganized the codebase into explicit pipeline stages, each of which can be run independently or via DVC.
  • Added GitHub CI integration, which ensures that any model changes don’t result in significant output changes.

assessment-year-2023

  • Added updated sales flagging and validation scripts in partnership with the Mansueto Institute. See Representativeness.
  • Rewrote the assessment stage for speed and improved accuracy when valuing prorated and multi-card PINs.
  • Added new feature importance output table, which shows the gain, frequency, and cover for each model run.
  • Added model QC and balance testing reports for ad-hoc analysis of model inputs.
  • Updated multi-card heuristic to only apply to PINs with 2 cards (improvements on the same parcel).
  • Updated townhome complex valuation method to prevent “chaining” via fuzzy grouping.
  • Updated CV implementation so that Lightsnip and Tidymodels share the same validation set: Lightsnip for early stopping, Tidymodels for Bayesian optimization.
  • Dropped explicit spatial lag generation in the ingest stage.
  • Lots of other bugfixes and minor improvements.

assessment-year-2024

  • Moved sales validation to a dedicated repository located at ccao-data/model-sales-val.
  • Infrastructure improvements
  • Added additional regressivity metrics (MKI) to measure model performance.
  • Switched cross-validation to V-fold instead of time-based.
  • Added new model features: corner lots, distance to vacant land/university/secondary roads, homeowner exemption indicator and length of exemption, number of recent sales, class.
  • Added linear baseline model for comparison against LightGBM to pipeline/01-train.
  • Added experimental comparable sales generation using LightGBM leaf nodes to pipeline/04-interpret.
  • Refactored shared pipeline logic into separate scripts to simplify development and maintainability.
  • Separated development/reporting dependencies from primary dependencies using renv profiles to increase replicability.

Ongoing Issues

The CCAO faces a number of ongoing issues which make modeling difficult. Some of these issues are in the process of being solved; others are less tractable. We list them here for the sake of transparency and to provide a sense of the challenges we face.

Data Quality and Integrity

We face a number of data-related challenges that are specific to our office. These issues are largely the result of legacy data systems, under-staffing, and the sheer number of properties in Cook County (over 1 million residential properties). We’re actively working to correct or mitigate most of these issues.

Lack of Property Characteristics

Our office tracks around 40 characteristics of individual properties. Of those 40, about 25 are usable in modeling. The remaining 15 characteristics are too sparse, too dirty, or too unbalanced to use. Additionally, our data is missing features commonly used in property valuation, such as:

  • Property condition.
  • Lot frontage.
  • Land slope.
  • Percentage of property above grade.
  • Quality of finishes.
  • Electrical and utility systems.
  • Interior characteristics like finish quality, recent remodeling, or kitchen quality.
  • Any information about pools.
  • Information about location desirability or views.

This lack of characteristics contributes to larger errors when modeling, as it becomes difficult to distinguish between individual properties. For example, an extremely run-down mansion with otherwise high-value characteristics (good location, large number of bedrooms) may be significantly over-assessed, due to our model not accounting for property condition.

Inaccurate Property Characteristics

The property characteristics we track can sometimes be incorrect or outdated. The two major sources of characteristic errors are:

  1. Data entry or processing errors. Records collected by our office often need to digitized and mistakes happen. Fortunately, these types of errors are relatively rare.
  2. Characteristic update errors. There are a variety of systems that update the characteristics of properties in our system. Some of them can be slow to detect changes or otherwise unreliable.

These errors can cause under- or over-assessment. If you believe your property has been misvalued due to a characteristic error or the property characteristics recorded on our website are incorrect. Please contact our office to file a property characteristic appeal.

Non-Arms-Length Sales

It is difficult for our office to determine whether or not any given property sale is arms-length. Non-arms-length sales, such as selling your home to a family member at a discount, can bias the model and result in larger assessment errors. We do our best to remove non-arms-length sales, but it’s nearly impossible to know for certain that every transaction is valid.

Incentives Not to Disclose Accurate Information

The Cook County property tax system is complex and can sometimes create perverse incentives.

For example, most property owners want their property taxes to be as low as possible, and are thus disincentivized from reporting characteristic errors which could raise their assessed value. Conversely, if a property owner plans to sell their home on a listing website, then they have a strong incentive (the highest possible sale price) to ensure the website accurately reflects their property’s characteristics. Listing websites know this and offer easy ways to self-update property attributes.

Falsely altering or not reporting property characteristics may change an assessed value, but it also has negative consequences for neighbors and similar properties. High sales on homes with incorrectly reported characteristics can upwardly bias the model, resulting in over-assessment for others.

Heterogeneity and Extremes

In addition to the data challenges that are specific to our office, we also face the same modeling issues as most assessors and machine learning practitioners.

Housing Heterogeneity

Cook County is an extremely large and diverse housing market. It spans millions of properties that vary widely in type, age, location, and quality. In some regions of the county, sales are common; in other regions, sales are sparse. Accurately estimating the price of such different properties and regions is a complicated, challenging task.

This challenge is especially acute in areas with high housing characteristic and price heterogeneity. For example, the Hyde Park neighborhood in Chicago is home to the University of Chicago and has large, multi-million-dollar houses near campus. However, sale prices drop precipitously just a few blocks away, as one passes south of 63rd street or west of I-90. This sort of sharp price discontinuity makes it difficult to accurately assess properties, as models tend to “smooth” such hard breaks unless geographic boundaries are explicitly defined.

Hyde Park is only one example, similarly unique situations exist throughout the county. Our model does account for some of these situations through neighborhood fixed effects and other location factors. However, effectively modeling major drivers of heterogeneity is an ongoing challenge.

High and Low-Value Properties

Mass appraisal models need lots of sales data in order to accurately predict sale prices, but sales become more sparse toward either end of the price spectrum. The vast majority of properties (over 90%) in Cook County sell for between $50K and $2.5M. Predicting sale prices outside of that range is difficult; there just aren’t enough representative sales to train the model effectively.

This issue is particularly prevalent within certain geographies with unevenly distributed sales. For example, in New Trier township the average 2021 sale price was around $1.2 million, compared to the whole county average of around $400K. Lower values sales closer to the county average are rare in New Trier. Due to that rarity, lower value properties in New Trier are more likely to be overvalued. The same situation exists in reverse for lower value areas.

This problem isn’t limited to mass appraisal models; predictive models in general are not good at predicting outliers. We may implement new machine learning techniques or policies to deal with this issue in the future.

FAQs

Q: My assessed value seems too low or too high. How do I fix it?

There are over one million residential properties in Cook County spanning a huge variety of locations, types, ages, and conditions. Mass appraisal should produce fair valuations for most properties. But a mass appraisal model isn’t going to accurately value every single property. If you believe that the value produced by our model is inaccurate, please file an appeal with our office.

Q: My home has been sold recently. Why isn’t my assessed value equal to my sale price?

Setting the assessed value of a home equal to the value of a recent sale is called selective appraisal or sales chasing. Sales chasing can artificially improve assessment performance statistics and bias statistical models. Worse, it can bias assessment accuracy in favor of recently sold properties, giving an unfair advantage to areas or properties with high turnover. For more information, see Appendix E of the IAAO Standard on Ratio Studies.

Q: How are comparables used in the model?

We don’t use sale or uniformity comparables for the purpose of modeling. Our model works by automatically finding patterns in sales data and extrapolating those patterns to predict prices; the model never explicitly says, “Here is property X and here are Y similar properties and their sale prices.”

We do use comparables for other things, namely when processing appeals and when evaluating the model’s performance. Note however that the comparables generated via #106 are experimental and are not currently used.

Q: What are the most important features in the model?

The importance of individual features in the model varies from place to place. Some properties will gain $50K in value from an additional bedroom, while others will gain almost nothing. However, some factors do stand out as more influential:

  • Location. Two identical single-family homes, one in Wicker Park, the other in Markham, will not receive the same valuation. Location is the largest driver of county-wide variation in property value. This is accounted for in our model through a number of location-based features such as school district, neighborhood, township, and others.
  • Square footage. Larger homes tend to be worth more than smaller ones, though there are diminishing marginal returns.
  • Number of bedrooms and bathrooms. Generally speaking, the more rooms the better, though again there are diminishing returns. The value added by a second bedroom is much more than the value added by a twentieth bedroom.

Q: How much will one additional bedroom add to my assessed value?

Our model is non-linear, meaning it’s difficult to say things like, “Each additional square foot will increase this property’s value by $50,” as the relationship between price and individual features varies from property to property.

We do calculate the contribution of each feature to each property’s final value. For example, we can say things like, “Your close proximity to Lake Michigan added $5,000 to your home’s value.” We’re currently working on a way to share those feature-level results with property owners.

Q: Why don’t you use a simple linear model?

We decided that performance was more important than the easy interpretability offered by linear models, and LightGBM tends to outperform linear models on data with a large number of categorical features, interactions, and non-linearities.

Q: How do you measure model performance?

Assessors tend to use housing and assessment-specific measurements to gauge the performance of their mass appraisal systems, including:

More traditionally, we use R2, root-mean-squared-error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) to gauge overall model performance and fit.

Q: How often does the model change?

We’re constantly making minor tweaks to improve the model’s accuracy, speed, and usability. However, major changes to the model typically take place during the downtime between reassessments, so about once per year.

Usage

There are two ways of running the model:

Running the Model Locally (All Users)

The code in this repository is written primarily in R. Please install the latest version of R (requires R version >= 4.2.1) and RStudio before proceeding with the steps below.

If you’re on Windows, you’ll also need to install Rtools in order to build the necessary packages. You may also want to (optionally) install DVC to pull data and run the pipeline.

We also publish a Docker image containing the model code and all of the dependencies necessary to run it. If you’re comfortable using Docker, you can skip the installation steps below and instead pull the image from ghcr.io/ccao-data/model-res-avm:master to run the latest version of the model.

Installation

  1. Clone this repository using git, or simply download it using the button at the top of the page.
  2. Set your working directory to the local folder containing this repository’s files, either using R’s setwd() command or (preferably) using RStudio’s projects.
  3. Install renv, R’s package manager, by running install.packages("renv").
  4. Install all R package dependencies using renv by running renv::restore(). This step may take awhile. Linux users will likely need to install dependencies (via apt, yum, etc.) to build from source.
  5. (Optional) The finalize step of the model pipeline requires some additional dependencies for generating a model performance report. Install these additional dependencies by running renv::restore(lockfile = "renv/profiles/reporting/renv.lock"). These dependencies must be installed in addition to the core dependencies installed in step 4. If dependencies are not installed, the report will fail to generate and the pipeline stage will print the error message to the report file at reports/performance.html; the pipeline will continue to execute in spite of the failure.

For installation issues, particularly related to package installation and dependencies, see Managing R dependencies and Troubleshooting.

Running

Manually

To use this repository, simply open the pipeline/ directory and run the R scripts in order. Non-CCAO users can skip the following stages:

Using DVC

The entire end-to-end pipeline can also be run using DVC. DVC will track the dependencies and parameters required to run each stage, cache intermediate files, and store versioned input data on S3.

To pull all the necessary input data based on the information in dvc.lock, run:

dvc pull

To run the entire pipeline (excluding the export stage), run:

dvc repro

Note that each stage will run only if necessary i.e. the ingest stage will not run if no parameters related to that stage have changed. To force a stage to re-run, run:

# Change ingest to any stage name
dvc repro -f ingest

To force the entire pipeline to re-run, run:

dvc repro -f

The web of dependencies, outputs, parameters, and intermediate files is defined via the dvc.yaml file. See that file for more information about each stage’s outputs, inputs/dependencies, and related parameters (defined in params.yaml).

Running the Model on AWS Batch (CCAO Staff Only)

If you have write permissions for this repository (i.e. you are a member of the CCAO Data Department), you can run the model in the cloud on AWS Batch using GitHub Actions workflow runs.

Executing a Run

Initialization

Model runs are initiated by the build-and-run-model workflow via manual dispatch.

To run a model, use the Run workflow button on right side of the build-and-run-model Actions page.

Runs are gated behind a deploy environment that requires approval from a @ccao-data/core-team member before the model will run. The build job to rebuild a Docker image for the model will always run, but the subsequent run job will not run unless a core-team member approves it.

Monitoring

Runs can be monitored on AWS via CloudWatch as they execute in a Batch job. Navigate to the run logs in the GitHub Actions console and look for the build-and-run-model / run job. Find the Wait for Batch job to start and print link to AWS logs step and expand it to reveal a link to the CloudWatch logs for the run.

Deleting Test Runs

Test runs of the model can be deleted using the delete-model-runs workflow. This workflow will delete all of the associated run artifacts from S3. To delete one or more runs, copy their unique IDs (e.g. 2024-01-01-foo-bar) and paste them in the workflow dispatch input box, with each run ID separated by a space (e.g. 2024-01-01-foo-bar 2024-02-02-bar-baz).

⚠️ NOTE: In order to protect production model run artifacts, the delete-model-runs workflow can only delete model runs for the upcoming assessment cycle (the current year from January-April, or the next year from May-December). The workflow will raise an error if you attempt to delete a model run outside the upcoming assessment cycle.

In the off chance that you do in fact need to delete a test run from a previous assessment cycle, you can work around this limitation by moving model run artifacts to bucket prefixes representing the partition for the upcoming assessment year (e.g. year=2024/) and then proceed to delete the model run.

Parameters

All control parameters, hyperparameters, toggles, etc. are stored in params.yaml. Almost all modifications to the pipeline are made via this file. It also contains a full description of each parameter and its purpose.

Each R script has a set of associated parameters (tracked via dvc.yaml). DVC will automatically detect changes in these parameters and will re-run stages for which parameters have changed. Stages without changed parameters or input data are cached and will be automatically skipped by DVC.

Output

The full model pipeline produces a large number of outputs. A full list of these outputs and their purpose can be found in misc/file_dict.csv. For public users, all outputs are saved in the output/ directory, where they can be further used/examined after a model run. For CCAO employees, all outputs are uploaded to S3 via the upload stage. Uploaded Parquet files are converted into the following Athena tables:

Athena Tables

Athena Table Observation Unit Primary Key Description
assessment_card card year, run_id, township_code, meta_pin, meta_card_num Assessment results at the card level AKA raw model output
assessment_pin pin year, run_id, township_code, meta_pin Assessment results at the PIN level AKA aggregated and cleaned
comp card year, run_id, meta_pin, meta_card_num Comparables for each card (computed using leaf node assignments)
feature_importance predictor year, run_id, model_predictor_all_name Feature importance values (gain, cover, and frequency) for the run
metadata model run year, run_id Information about each run, including parameters, run ID, git info, etc.
parameter_final model run year, run_id Chosen set of hyperparameters for each run
parameter_range parameter year, run_id, parameter_name Range of hyperparameters searched during CV tuning
parameter_search model cv fold year, run_id, configuration, fold_id Tidymodels tuning output from cross-validation
performance geography [by class] year, run_id, stage, geography_type, geography_id, by_class, class Peformance metrics (optionally) broken out by class for different levels of geography
performance_quantile geography [by class] by quantile year, run_id, stage, geography_type, geography_id, by_class, class, quantile Performance metrics by quantile within class and geography
shap card year, run_id, township_code, meta_pin, meta_card_num SHAP values for each feature for each card in the assessment data
test_card card year, meta_pin, meta_card_num Test set predictions at the card level
timing model run year, run_id Finalized time elapsed for each stage of the run

Getting Data

The data required to run these scripts is produced by the ingest stage, which uses SQL pulls from the CCAO’s Athena database as a primary data source. CCAO employees can run the ingest stage or pull the latest version of the input data from our internal DVC store using:

dvc pull

Public users can download data for each assessment year using the links below. Each file should be placed in the input/ directory prior to running the model pipeline.

2021

2022

2023

2024

Due to a data issue with the initial 2024 model run, there are actually two final 2024 models. The run 2024-02-06-relaxed-tristan was used for Rogers Park and West townships only, while the run 2024-03-17-stupefied-maya was used for all subsequent City of Chicago townships.

The data issue caused some sales to be omitted from the 2024-02-06-relaxed-tristan training set, however the actual impact on predicted values was extremely minimal. We chose to update the data and create a second final model out of an abundance of caution, and, given low transaction volume in 2023, to include as many arms-length transactions in the training set as possible.

2024-02-06-relaxed-tristan
2024-03-17-stupefied-maya (final)

For other data from the CCAO, please visit the Cook County Data Portal.

System Requirements

Both Tidymodels and LightGBM support parallel processing to speed up model training. However, the current parallel implementation in Tidymodels is extremely memory-intensive, as it needs to carry loaded packages and objects into each worker process. As such, parallel processing in Tidymodels is turned off, while parallel processing in LightGBM is turned on. This means that models are fit sequentially, but each model fitting is sped up using the parallel processing built-in to LightGBM. Note that:

  • The total amount of RAM needed for overall model fitting is around 6GB, though this is ultimately dependent on a number of LightGBM parameters.
  • The number of threads is set via the num_threads parameter, which is passed to the model using the set_args() function from parsnip. By default, num_threads is equal to the full number of physical cores available. More (or faster) cores will decrease total training time.
  • This repository uses the CPU version of LightGBM included with the LightGBM R package. If you’d like to use the GPU version you’ll need to build it yourself.

Managing R Dependencies

We use renv to manage R dependencies. The main model dependencies are listed explicitly in the DESCRIPTION file under the Depends: key. These dependencies are installed automatically when you run renv::restore().

Profiles and Lockfiles

We use multiple renv lockfiles to manage R dependencies:

  1. renv.lock is the canonical list of dependencies that are used by the core model pipeline. Any dependencies that are required to run the model itself should be defined in this lockfile.
  2. renv/profiles/reporting/renv.lock is the canonical list of dependencies that are used to generate model reports in the finalize step of the pipeline. Any dependencies that are required to generate reports should be defined in this lockfile.
  3. renv/profiles/dev/renv.lock is the canonical list of dependencies that are used for local development, running the ingest, export, and api steps of the pipeline, and building the README. These dependencies are required only by CCAO staff and are not required to run the model itself.

Our goal in maintaining multiple lockfiles is to keep the list of dependencies required to run the model as short as possible. This choice adds overhead to the process of updating R dependencies, but incurs the benefit of a more maintainable model over the long term.

Using Lockfiles for Local Development

When working on the model locally, you’ll typically want to install non-core dependencies on top of the core dependencies. To do this, simply run renv::restore(lockfile = "<path_to_lockfile") to install all dependencies from the lockfile.

For example, if you’re working on the ingest stage and want to install all its dependencies, start with the main profile (run renv::activate()), then install the dev profile dependencies on top of it (run renv::restore(lockfile = "renv/profiles/dev/renv.lock")).

⚠️ WARNING: Installing dependencies from a dev lockfile will overwrite any existing version installed by the core one. For example, if [email protected] is installed by the core lockfile, and [email protected] is installed by the dev lockfile, renv will overwrite [email protected] with [email protected].

Updating Lockfiles

The process for updating core model pipeline dependencies is straightforward:

  1. Add the dependency to the list of explicit dependencies under the Depends: key of the DESCRIPTION file
  2. Run renv::install("<dependency_name>")
  3. Run renv::snapshot() to update the core lockfile (the root renv.lock)

The process for updating *dependencies for other lockfiles** is more complex, since it requires the use of a separate profile when running renv commands. Determine the name of the profile you’d like to update (<profile_name> in the code that follows) and run the following commands:

  1. Run renv::activate(profile = "<profile_name>") to set the renv profile to <profile_name>
  2. Make sure that the dependency is defined in the DESCRIPTION file under the Config/renv/profiles/<profile_name>/dependencies key
  3. Run renv::install("<dependency_name>") to add or update the dependency as necessary
  4. Run renv::snapshot() to update the reporting lockfile with the dependencies defined in the DESCRIPTION file
  5. Run renv::activate() if you would like to switch back to the default renv profile

Troubleshooting

The dependencies for this repository are numerous and not all of them may install correctly. Here are some common install issues (as seen in the R console) as well as their respective resolutions:

  • Error: WARNING: Rtools is required to build R packages, but is not currently installed
    Solution: Install the latest version of Rtools from CRAN, following the instructions listed.

  • Error: DLL '<package-name>' not found: maybe not installed for this architecture?
    Solution: Try installing the package manually with the INSTALL_opts flag set. See here for an example.

License

Distributed under the AGPL-3 License. See LICENSE for more information.

Contributing

We welcome pull requests, comments, and other feedback via GitHub. For more involved collaboration or projects, please see the Developer Engagement Program documentation on our group wiki.

About

Automated valuation model for all class 200 residential properties in Cook County (except vacant land and condos)

Topics

data-science machine-learning r model assessment res property-taxes tidymodels

Resources

Readme

License

AGPL-3.0 license
Activity
Custom properties

Stars

28 stars

Watchers

1 watching

Forks

5 forks
Report repository

Releases

4 tags

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors 7

Languages