[BV-599] Kubeconfig helper #281
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11999658197Details
💛 - Coveralls |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
leverage/modules/auth.py (1)
Line range hint
1-146: Consider enhancing credential security measures.While the core functionality is solid, consider implementing these security best practices for credential handling:
- Set restrictive file permissions (600) when creating/updating credential files
- Implement file locking during credential updates to prevent race conditions
- Securely overwrite old credentials before deletion
Here's a suggested implementation approach:
import os import fcntl from pathlib import Path def secure_write_credentials(file_path: Path, content: str): # Create file with restricted permissions with open(file_path, 'w') as f: os.chmod(file_path, 0o600) fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_EX) try: f.write(content) f.flush() os.fsync(f.fileno()) finally: fcntl.flock(f, fcntl.LOCK_UN)Would you like me to create an issue to track these security enhancements?
tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py (5)
128-130: Fix grammatical error in docstring.The docstring has a grammatical error. Consider rewording it to:
"Test that we can find valid metadata.yaml files present in the filesystem tree path where we are located."
132-140: Combine nested with statements and add negative test cases.
- The nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- Consider adding negative test cases to verify behavior when:
- metadata.yaml is not found
- YAML is invalid
- cluster type is not "k8s-eks-cluster"
- with mock.patch("os.walk") as mock_walk: - with patch("builtins.open"): - with mock.patch("ruamel.yaml.safe_load") as mock_yaml: + with mock.patch("os.walk") as mock_walk, \ + patch("builtins.open"), \ + mock.patch("ruamel.yaml.safe_load") as mock_yaml:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
132-133: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatementsCombine
withstatements(SIM117)
141-145: Consider testing multiple cluster scenarios.The test only verifies the first found cluster using
next(). Consider testing scenarios with multiple clusters to ensure the generator works correctly for all cases.
156-161: Combine nested with statements and add edge cases.
- The nested
withstatements can be combined for better readability.- Consider adding test cases for:
- User canceling selection (TerminalMenu returns None)
- No clusters found (_scan_clusters returns empty list)
- Invalid cluster data
- with patch.object(kubectl_container, "_scan_clusters", return_value=[(Path.cwd(), mocked_cluster_data)]): - with patch("simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu") as mkd_show: - mkd_show.return_value.show.return_value = 0 # simulate choosing the first result - with patch.object(kubectl_container.paths, "update_cwd") as mkd_update: - with patch.object(kubectl_container, "configure") as mkd_configure: + with patch.object(kubectl_container, "_scan_clusters", return_value=[(Path.cwd(), mocked_cluster_data)]), \ + patch("simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu") as mkd_show, \ + patch.object(kubectl_container.paths, "update_cwd") as mkd_update, \ + patch.object(kubectl_container, "configure") as mkd_configure:🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
156-157: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
159-160: Use a single
withstatement with multiple contexts instead of nestedwithstatements(SIM117)
163-164: Add more specific assertions.The current assertions only verify that methods were called and type checking. Consider adding assertions for:
- The actual values passed to update_cwd
- The cluster info data passed to configure matches mocked_cluster_data
# Example assertions to add: assert mkd_update.call_args[0][0] == Path.cwd() cluster_info = mkd_configure.call_args[0][0] assert cluster_info.cluster_name == "test" assert cluster_info.profile == "test" assert cluster_info.region == "us-east-1"tests/test_modules/test_auth.py (1)
199-210: Add error handling for missing files.The changes look good overall, with improved type hints and special file handling. However, consider adding error handling for cases where the file doesn't exist in data_dict.
Consider this improvement:
def open_side_effect(name: PosixPath, *args, **kwargs): """ Everytime we call open(), this side effect will try to get the value from data_dict rather than reading a disk file. + + Args: + name: Path to the file to mock + *args: Additional arguments passed to open() + **kwargs: Additional keyword arguments passed to open() + + Returns: + A mock file object with the specified content + + Raises: + FileNotFoundError: If the file doesn't exist in data_dict """ if str(name).endswith("config.tf"): read_data = FILE_CONFIG_TF elif str(name).endswith("locals.tf"): read_data = FILE_LOCALS_TF else: + if str(name) not in data_dict: + raise FileNotFoundError(f"Mock file not found: {name}") read_data = data_dict[name] return mock.mock_open(read_data=read_data)()leverage/path.py (1)
5-5: Remove redundant importThe
pathlibimport is unnecessary sincePathis already imported directly frompathlib.-import pathlib🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
5-5:
pathlibimported but unusedRemove unused import:
pathlib(F401)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py (2)
15-19: Add a docstring to theClusterInfodata classWhile the
ClusterInfodata class is straightforward, adding a docstring would improve code readability and provide clarity on its purpose and usage.
89-89: Use!=operator instead ofnot ==for better readabilityIn line 89, consider replacing
not d[0] == "."withd[0] != "."to improve readability and align with common Python practices.Apply this change:
-dirs[:] = [d for d in dirs if not d[0] == "."] +dirs[:] = [d for d in dirs if d[0] != "."]🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
89-89: Use
d[0] != "."instead ofnot d[0] == "."Replace with
!=operator(SIM201)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py(3 hunks)leverage/modules/auth.py(1 hunks)leverage/modules/kubectl.py(1 hunks)leverage/path.py(3 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py(2 hunks)tests/test_modules/test_auth.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py
89-89: Use d[0] != "." instead of not d[0] == "."
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
leverage/path.py
5-5: pathlib imported but unused
Remove unused import: pathlib
(F401)
tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py
132-133: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
Combine with statements
(SIM117)
156-157: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
159-160: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
leverage/modules/kubectl.py (3)
36-38: LGTM! Verify cluster layer check behavior.
The addition of the cluster layer check before configuration is appropriate and consistent with the shell command pattern.
Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation and test coverage.
Implementation and test coverage for cluster layer check verified
The implementation is properly done with:
- Clear error handling that raises
ExitErrorif not in cluster layer - Appropriate error message for user guidance
- Test coverage that verifies the error case
- Proper integration with the existing layer location checking mechanism
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of check_for_cluster_layer
# Look for the method definition and its error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'def check_for_cluster_layer($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for test coverage
rg -l "test.*check_for_cluster_layer" -g "test_*.py"
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of check_for_cluster_layer
rg "def check_for_cluster_layer" -A 10
# Check the test implementation
cat tests/test_path.py
Length of output: 5998
40-43: Add docstring to explain the discover command's purpose.
While the implementation is clean and follows the established pattern, adding a docstring would improve clarity for users and maintainers.
Let's verify the discover implementation:
@kubectl.command(context_settings=CONTEXT_SETTINGS)
@pass_container
def discover(kctl: KubeCtlContainer):
+ """Discover and select available EKS clusters in the current context."""
kctl.discover()✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information about the implementation and test coverage.
Docstring suggestion is valid, but implementation is well-tested and documented
The discover command is already well-implemented in the container with comprehensive documentation and test coverage:
- Container's
discover()method has a clear docstring explaining it scans for k8s clusters and presents a menu - Implementation is thoroughly tested in
test_discover()function - The command follows the established pattern consistently
Suggested docstring addition:
@kubectl.command(context_settings=CONTEXT_SETTINGS)
@pass_container
def discover(kctl: KubeCtlContainer):
"""Discover and select available Kubernetes clusters in the current context.
Scans subdirectories for cluster metadata files and presents an interactive menu to configure kubectl."""
kctl.discover()🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the discover implementation
# Look for the discover method implementation and its test coverage
# Check the container implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def discover($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for test coverage
rg -l "test.*discover" -g "test_*.py"
Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the discover implementation in the container
rg "def discover" -A 10
# Check the test implementation
cat tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py
Length of output: 7781
28-28: LGTM! Verify path check behavior.
The addition of the layer location check before starting the shell is a good defensive programming practice.
Let's verify the behavior of this check:
✅ Verification successful
Path check implementation verified and secure
The check_for_layer_location method in leverage/path.py implements proper validation:
- Prevents execution in configuration directories
- Prevents execution in project/account roots
- Ensures presence of Terraform files (*.tf) in the current directory
- Raises clear error messages with appropriate exit codes
The method is well-tested as evidenced by its usage across multiple modules (terraform, kubectl, aws) and test coverage in tests/test_path.py.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of check_for_layer_location
# Look for the method definition and its error handling
ast-grep --pattern 'def check_for_layer_location($_) {
$$$
}'
# Look for test coverage
rg -l "test.*check_for_layer_location" -g "test_*.py"
Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to locate the check_for_layer_location implementation
# Search for the method name without AST matching
rg "check_for_layer_location" -A 5
# Look for files containing 'paths' in the leverage directory
fd "paths.py" leverage
# If we find the file, let's examine its content
fd "paths.py" leverage -x cat {}
Length of output: 4542
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation in path.py
cat leverage/path.py
Length of output: 9820
pyproject.toml (1)
43-43: LGTM! Let's verify the dependency version.
The addition of simple-term-menu is appropriate for implementing cluster selection in the CLI. The exact version pinning follows the project's versioning strategy.
Let's verify the version and compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Dependency version and compatibility verified
The pinned version 1.6.4 is the latest stable release (as of December 2023) with no known security vulnerabilities. The package requires Python >=3.5, which is compatible with the project's Python 3.9-3.12 support range.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version, Python compatibility, and security advisories for simple-term-menu
# Check PyPI for latest versions and Python compatibility
echo "Checking latest version and compatibility..."
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/simple-term-menu/json | jq '{
latest_version: .info.version,
python_requires: .info.requires_python,
release_date: .releases["1.6.4"][0].upload_time
}'
# Check for security advisories
echo "Checking for security advisories..."
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: PIP, package: "simple-term-menu") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 822
leverage/modules/auth.py (1)
68-68: LGTM! Improved file path handling.
The change to use cli.paths.cwd for constructing file paths is a good improvement that makes the code more robust when executed from different working directories.
Let's verify the behavior with different working directory scenarios:
✅ Verification successful
File path handling is consistent and secure
The verification confirms that the use of cli.paths.cwd is appropriate and consistent with the codebase's file handling patterns:
- The file under review is the only instance using
cli.paths.cwd, specifically for Terraform file operations - Other file operations in auth.py use similar secure path handling via
cli.paths.local_backend_tfvars - No unsafe path traversal patterns are used in file operations
- All file opens have proper error handling with try-catch blocks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential file path edge cases in the codebase
# Check if there are any other direct file opens that might need similar fixes
rg -g '!test*' 'open\([^c].*\.tf[^)]'
# Check for any potential path traversal or path manipulation
rg -g '!test*' '(\.\.\/|\.\/|\~\/|\$HOME)'
# Look for similar patterns that might need the same fix
ast-grep --pattern 'open($path)'
Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for direct file opens with .tf files, escaping special chars properly
rg -g '!test*' 'open\(' -A 2
# Check for path traversal patterns with properly escaped regex
rg -g '!test*' '\.\./|\./|~/|\$HOME'
# Look for file operations in auth.py to understand the context better
rg -g 'auth.py' 'open\(' -A 2
# Check how cli.paths.cwd is used across the codebase
rg 'cli\.paths\.cwd'
Length of output: 2755
tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py (1)
1-8: LGTM: Import statements are well-organized.
The new imports are properly organized and necessary for the added test functions.
tests/test_modules/test_auth.py (1)
2-2: LGTM!
The PosixPath import is correctly placed and necessary for type hinting.
leverage/path.py (1)
269-289: LGTM! Verify impact on existing callers
The changes to make path optional with proper typing and validation look good. The error messages are clear and the validation sequence is correct.
Let's verify the impact on existing callers:
✅ Verification successful
All callers handle the optional path parameter correctly
The verification shows that all callers of both methods are using them correctly:
check_for_layer_location()is called without arguments in all 9 occurrences acrosscontainer.py,kubectl.py,terraform.py, andaws.py, which correctly uses the defaultself.cwdcheck_for_cluster_layer()is called without arguments in both production usages inkubectl.pyand test code, which correctly uses the default behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all callers of check_for_layer_location and check_for_cluster_layer
# to ensure they handle the new optional parameter correctly
echo "Searching for callers of check_for_layer_location:"
rg "check_for_layer_location\(" --type py -A 2
echo -e "\nSearching for callers of check_for_cluster_layer:"
rg "check_for_cluster_layer\(" --type py -A 2
Length of output: 2914
| def test_scan_clusters(kubectl_container: KubeCtlContainer): | ||
| """ | ||
| Test that we can find valid metadata.yaml presents in the down the path of the filesystem tree where we are staying. | ||
| """ | ||
| # mock and call | ||
| with mock.patch("os.walk") as mock_walk: | ||
| with patch("builtins.open"): | ||
| with mock.patch("ruamel.yaml.safe_load") as mock_yaml: | ||
| mock_walk.return_value = [ | ||
| ("/foo", ["bar"], ("baz",)), | ||
| ("/foo/bar", [], ("spam", "metadata.yaml")), | ||
| ] | ||
| mock_yaml.return_value = {"type": "k8s-eks-cluster"} | ||
|
|
||
| first_found = next(kubectl_container._scan_clusters()) | ||
|
|
||
| # compare | ||
| assert first_found[0] == PosixPath("/foo/bar/") | ||
| assert first_found[1]["type"] == "k8s-eks-cluster" | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def test_discover(kubectl_container: KubeCtlContainer): | ||
| """ | ||
| Test that, given a layer with a valid cluster file, we are able to call the k8s configuration routine. | ||
| """ | ||
| mocked_cluster_data = { | ||
| "type": "k8s-eks-cluster", | ||
| "data": {"cluster_name": "test", "profile": "test", "region": "us-east-1"}, | ||
| } | ||
| with patch.object(kubectl_container, "_scan_clusters", return_value=[(Path.cwd(), mocked_cluster_data)]): | ||
| with patch("simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu") as mkd_show: | ||
| mkd_show.return_value.show.return_value = 0 # simulate choosing the first result | ||
| with patch.object(kubectl_container.paths, "update_cwd") as mkd_update: | ||
| with patch.object(kubectl_container, "configure") as mkd_configure: | ||
| kubectl_container.discover() | ||
|
|
||
| assert mkd_update.called | ||
| assert isinstance(mkd_configure.call_args_list[0][0][0], ClusterInfo) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add test cases for uncovered error paths
The following error paths need test coverage:
- Error handling in
_scan_clusters()for invalid YAML files and non-k8s cluster files - Error path in
discover()when no clusters are found - Error path in
discover()when menu selection is cancelled
The implementation shows several error paths that aren't covered by tests:
-
In
_scan_clusters():except Exception as exc: logger.warning(exc) continue
-
In
discover():if not cluster_files: raise ExitError(1, "No clusters found.")
if menu_entry_index is None: # selection cancelled return
These paths should be tested to ensure robust error handling and maintain code coverage.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for error paths.
According to the coverage report, some lines lost coverage in the kubectl module. Consider adding test cases for error paths to improve the coverage and ensure robust error handling.
Let me gather more information about the test coverage and error paths.
Let me check the actual implementation of the KubeCtlContainer to better understand all error paths.
Let me try a different approach to find the implementation.
Let me check the entire file content to see all error paths and their current test coverage.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find TODO/FIXME comments and untested error paths
rg -g '!tests/*' -A 5 'raise\s+\w+Error|TODO|FIXME' leverage/containers/kubectl.py
Length of output: 743
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check test coverage for error paths
rg -g 'tests/*' 'ExitError|raise' tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the implementation of KubeCtlContainer
ast-grep --pattern 'class KubeCtlContainer {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 55
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the KubeCtlContainer implementation
rg -A 10 "class KubeCtlContainer" leverage/containers/kubectl.py
Length of output: 481
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full content of both implementation and test files
echo "=== Implementation file ==="
cat leverage/containers/kubectl.py
echo -e "\n=== Test file ==="
cat tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py
Length of output: 12096
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
132-133: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
Combine with statements
(SIM117)
156-157: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
159-160: Use a single with statement with multiple contexts instead of nested with statements
(SIM117)
| def update_cwd(self, new_cwd): | ||
| self.cwd = new_cwd | ||
| acc_folder = new_cwd.relative_to(self.root_dir).parts[0] | ||
|
|
||
| self.account_config_dir = self.root_dir / acc_folder / "config" | ||
| account_config_path = self.account_config_dir / self.ACCOUNT_TF_VARS | ||
| self.account_conf = hcl2.loads(account_config_path.read_text()) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation and error handling to update_cwd
The method needs additional safeguards:
- Validate that new_cwd exists and is within the project
- Handle ValueError from relative_to() if new_cwd is not under root_dir
- Verify account config file exists
- Handle potential HCL parsing errors
Consider this safer implementation:
def update_cwd(self, new_cwd):
+ if not new_cwd.exists():
+ raise ExitError(1, f"Directory {new_cwd} does not exist")
+ try:
+ relative_path = new_cwd.relative_to(self.root_dir)
+ except ValueError:
+ raise ExitError(1, f"Directory {new_cwd} is not within the project")
+
self.cwd = new_cwd
- acc_folder = new_cwd.relative_to(self.root_dir).parts[0]
+ acc_folder = relative_path.parts[0]
self.account_config_dir = self.root_dir / acc_folder / "config"
account_config_path = self.account_config_dir / self.ACCOUNT_TF_VARS
- self.account_conf = hcl2.loads(account_config_path.read_text())
+ if not account_config_path.exists():
+ raise ExitError(1, f"Account config file not found: {account_config_path}")
+ try:
+ self.account_conf = hcl2.loads(account_config_path.read_text())
+ except Exception as e:
+ raise ExitError(1, f"Failed to parse account config: {e}")📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| def update_cwd(self, new_cwd): | |
| self.cwd = new_cwd | |
| acc_folder = new_cwd.relative_to(self.root_dir).parts[0] | |
| self.account_config_dir = self.root_dir / acc_folder / "config" | |
| account_config_path = self.account_config_dir / self.ACCOUNT_TF_VARS | |
| self.account_conf = hcl2.loads(account_config_path.read_text()) | |
| def update_cwd(self, new_cwd): | |
| if not new_cwd.exists(): | |
| raise ExitError(1, f"Directory {new_cwd} does not exist") | |
| try: | |
| relative_path = new_cwd.relative_to(self.root_dir) | |
| except ValueError: | |
| raise ExitError(1, f"Directory {new_cwd} is not within the project") | |
| self.cwd = new_cwd | |
| acc_folder = relative_path.parts[0] | |
| self.account_config_dir = self.root_dir / acc_folder / "config" | |
| account_config_path = self.account_config_dir / self.ACCOUNT_TF_VARS | |
| if not account_config_path.exists(): | |
| raise ExitError(1, f"Account config file not found: {account_config_path}") | |
| try: | |
| self.account_conf = hcl2.loads(account_config_path.read_text()) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| raise ExitError(1, f"Failed to parse account config: {e}") |
| cluster_info = ClusterInfo( | ||
| cluster_name=cluster_data["data"]["cluster_name"], | ||
| profile=cluster_data["data"]["profile"], | ||
| region=cluster_data["data"]["region"], | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate cluster data before creating ClusterInfo instance
Before creating a ClusterInfo instance, ensure that the necessary keys (cluster_name, profile, and region) are present in cluster_data["data"]. Missing keys could result in a KeyError. Adding validation will make the code more robust.
Apply this change:
+required_keys = {'cluster_name', 'profile', 'region'}
+if not required_keys.issubset(cluster_data["data"]):
+ logger.error("Cluster data is missing required information.")
+ returnInsert the above code before creating the ClusterInfo instance.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| cluster_info = ClusterInfo( | |
| cluster_name=cluster_data["data"]["cluster_name"], | |
| profile=cluster_data["data"]["profile"], | |
| region=cluster_data["data"]["region"], | |
| ) | |
| required_keys = {'cluster_name', 'profile', 'region'} | |
| if not required_keys.issubset(cluster_data["data"]): | |
| logger.error("Cluster data is missing required information.") | |
| return | |
| cluster_info = ClusterInfo( | |
| cluster_name=cluster_data["data"]["cluster_name"], | |
| profile=cluster_data["data"]["profile"], | |
| region=cluster_data["data"]["region"], | |
| ) |
| terminal_menu = simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu( | ||
| [f"{c[1]['data']['cluster_name']}: {str(c[0])}" for c in cluster_files], title="Clusters found:" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle potential KeyError exceptions when accessing cluster data
When generating the menu options, accessing nested dictionary keys like c[1]['data']['cluster_name'] without checking if they exist may lead to a KeyError if the expected keys are missing. Consider adding checks or using the get method with default values to prevent the application from crashing due to unexpected data.
Apply this change:
-terminal_menu = simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu(
- [f"{c[1]['data']['cluster_name']}: {str(c[0])}" for c in cluster_files], title="Clusters found:"
+terminal_menu = simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu(
+ [f"{c[1]['data'].get('cluster_name', 'Unknown')}: {str(c[0])}" for c in cluster_files], title="Clusters found:"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| terminal_menu = simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu( | |
| [f"{c[1]['data']['cluster_name']}: {str(c[0])}" for c in cluster_files], title="Clusters found:" | |
| ) | |
| terminal_menu = simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu( | |
| [f"{c[1]['data'].get('cluster_name', 'Unknown')}: {str(c[0])}" for c in cluster_files], title="Clusters found:" | |
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py (3)
15-20: Add field validation to ClusterInfo dataclassConsider adding field validation to ensure the integrity of cluster information. This can prevent issues with empty or invalid values.
@dataclass class ClusterInfo: - cluster_name: str - profile: str - region: str + cluster_name: str + profile: str + region: str + + def __post_init__(self): + if not all([self.cluster_name, self.profile, self.region]): + raise ValueError("All fields must have non-empty values")
53-69: Consider logging the generated command for debuggingThe command generation logic could benefit from debug logging to help troubleshoot configuration issues.
if ci: # if you have the details, generate the command right away cmd = f"aws eks update-kubeconfig --region {ci.region} --name {ci.cluster_name} --profile {ci.profile}" + logger.debug(f"Generated command: {cmd}") else: # otherwise go get them from the layer logger.info("Retrieving k8s cluster information...")
87-89: Simplify directory filtering conditionThe directory filtering condition can be simplified for better readability.
- dirs[:] = [d for d in dirs if not d[0] == "."] + dirs[:] = [d for d in dirs if d[0] != "."]🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
89-89: Use
d[0] != "."instead ofnot d[0] == "."Replace with
!=operator(SIM201)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.7.0)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py
89-89: Use d[0] != "." instead of not d[0] == "."
Replace with != operator
(SIM201)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py (1)
134-141: Verify working directory update safety
The working directory update logic should verify the path exists and is accessible before updating.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the path handling in the codebase, particularly focusing on the Path class implementation and its safety measures.
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide the final response:
Working directory update is safely implemented
The working directory update is safe because:
- The
layer_pathis obtained through a controlled discovery process that validates the path exists via_scan_clusters - The path is always relative to the repository root and guest base path
- The
update_cwdmethod inPathsHandlerusesrelative_towhich raisesValueErrorfor invalid paths - The path is validated as a cluster layer through metadata.yaml content verification before updating
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential path traversal or access issues in working directory updates
# Search for other working directory updates in the codebase
rg "update_cwd|working_dir" --type py
# Look for path validation patterns
rg "Path.*exists|Path.*resolve" --type py
Length of output: 1336
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the Path class implementation and its usage
cat leverage/path.py
# Look for any path validation or sanitization in the kubectl container
cat leverage/containers/kubectl.py
# Check for any test cases related to path handling
cat tests/test_containers/test_kubectl.py
Length of output: 21825
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
leverage/containers/kubectl.py (4)
16-25: Add docstrings to new data structures.The
ClusterInfodataclass andMetadataTypesenum look well-structured, but would benefit from docstrings describing their purpose and field descriptions.Apply this change:
@dataclass class ClusterInfo: + """Represents EKS cluster configuration details. + + Attributes: + cluster_name: Name of the EKS cluster + profile: AWS profile to use for authentication + region: AWS region where the cluster is located + """ cluster_name: str profile: str region: str class MetadataTypes(Enum): + """Enumeration of supported metadata types. + + Attributes: + K8S_CLUSTER: Represents an EKS cluster configuration + """ K8S_CLUSTER = "k8s-eks-cluster"
88-111: Enhance error handling specificity in _scan_clusters.The generic Exception catch block could be more specific to handle different error cases appropriately.
Apply this change:
- try: + try: + if not cluster_file.is_file(): + continue with open(cluster_file) as cluster_yaml_file: data = ruamel.yaml.safe_load(cluster_yaml_file) if data.get("type") != MetadataTypes.K8S_CLUSTER: continue - except Exception as exc: + except (OSError, IOError) as exc: + logger.warning(f"Failed to read {cluster_file}: {exc}") + continue + except ruamel.yaml.YAMLError as exc: + logger.warning(f"Invalid YAML in {cluster_file}: {exc}") continue
112-144: Enhance user feedback in discover method.Add logging statements to provide better visibility of the discovery process and user actions.
Apply this change:
def discover(self): + logger.info("Scanning for Kubernetes clusters...") cluster_files = [(path, data) for path, data in self._scan_clusters()] if not cluster_files: raise ExitError(1, "No clusters found.") + logger.info(f"Found {len(cluster_files)} clusters") terminal_menu = simple_term_menu.TerminalMenu( [f"{c[1]['data']['cluster_name']}: {str(c[0])}" for c in cluster_files], title="Clusters found:" ) menu_entry_index = terminal_menu.show() if menu_entry_index is None: + logger.info("Cluster selection cancelled") return layer_path = cluster_files[menu_entry_index][0] cluster_data = cluster_files[menu_entry_index][1] + logger.info(f"Selected cluster: {cluster_data['data']['cluster_name']}")
Security: Kubeconfig directory requires permission hardening
The code creates
.kube/{project}directory without setting secure file permissions. This directory will store sensitive Kubernetes credentials obtained through AWS EKS. To prevent unauthorized access:
- Set directory permissions to 700 (rwx------)
- Set file permissions to 600 (rw-------) for the kubeconfig file
- Add permission checks after
mkdir()callExample locations needing attention:
leverage/containers/kubectl.py:38: Add permission hardening aftermkdir(parents=True)🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
35-45: Verify kubeconfig file permissions.The code creates a
.kubedirectory but doesn't set secure file permissions. Consider setting appropriate permissions to protect sensitive AWS credentials.Run the following script to check the current file permissions:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check file permissions for kubeconfig directory and files # Check if the .kube directory has secure permissions find . -type d -name ".kube" -exec ls -ld {} \; # Check if any kubeconfig files are world-readable find . -type f -name "config" -path "*/.kube/*" -exec ls -l {} \;Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's verify if the code actually sets any file permissions by searching for chmod/umask calls rg -A 2 -B 2 "chmod|umask" leverage/containers/ # Also check for any file permission related code patterns using ast-grep ast-grep --pattern 'mkdir($$$)' leverage/containers/ ast-grep --pattern 'chmod($$$)' leverage/containers/ # Let's also check the full context of the kubectl.py file to see if permissions are set elsewhere cat leverage/containers/kubectl.pyLength of output: 5479
| def configure(self, ci: ClusterInfo = None): | ||
| """ | ||
| Add the given EKS cluster configuration to the .kube/ files. | ||
| """ | ||
| if ci: | ||
| # if you have the details, generate the command right away | ||
| cmd = f"aws eks update-kubeconfig --region {ci.region} --name {ci.cluster_name} --profile {ci.profile}" | ||
| else: | ||
| # otherwise go get them from the layer | ||
| logger.info("Retrieving k8s cluster information...") | ||
| with CustomEntryPoint(self, entrypoint=""): | ||
| cmd = self._get_eks_kube_config() | ||
|
|
||
| logger.info("Configuring context...") | ||
| with AwsCredsEntryPoint(self, override_entrypoint=""): | ||
| exit_code = self._start(add_eks_cluster_cmd) | ||
| exit_code = self._start(cmd) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance AWS command construction robustness.
The AWS command construction could be more robust by:
- Sanitizing input parameters to prevent command injection
- Validating region format
- Adding error handling for AWS CLI command execution
Apply this change:
+ def _validate_cluster_info(self, ci: ClusterInfo) -> bool:
+ """Validate cluster information parameters."""
+ if not ci.region.strip().isalnum():
+ logger.error("Invalid region format")
+ return False
+ if not ci.cluster_name.strip().isalnum():
+ logger.error("Invalid cluster name format")
+ return False
+ return True
def configure(self, ci: ClusterInfo = None):
if ci:
+ if not self._validate_cluster_info(ci):
+ raise ExitError(1, "Invalid cluster configuration")
+ # Sanitize inputs and use shlex.quote if needed
cmd = f"aws eks update-kubeconfig --region {ci.region} --name {ci.cluster_name} --profile {ci.profile}"Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
What?
Why?
References
closes #123, if this PR closes a GitHub issue#123Before release
Review the checklist here
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
kubectlmodule.ClusterInfoto encapsulate cluster-related information.Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores
simple-term-menufor improved user interaction.