-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create .coderabbit.yaml #62
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced involve a new configuration for code reviews in Changes
Poem
TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
- .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
- 1-28: The configuration file looks good. It's well-structured and covers a wide range of settings for automated code reviews. However, ensure that the specified path filters and instructions align with your project structure and requirements. Also, verify that the ignored title keywords and base branches for auto review match your team's workflow.
@coderabbitai does this configuration seems good? |
This is an invalid command. Please refer to the list of valid keywords below. CodeRabbit Commands
|
@coderabbitai review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Files selected for processing (1)
- Maps/main.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
Maps/main.go (1)
- 25-27: The loop is correct and will print all the values in the
languages
map.
for _ value := range languages { | ||
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a syntax error in the for loop. The underscore and value
should be separated by a comma.
- for _ value := range languages {
+ for _, value := range languages {
Commitable suggestion
[!IMPORTANT]
Carefully review the code before committing. Make sure it correctly replaces the highlighted code, has no missing lines and indentaion issues.
for _ value := range languages { | |
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value) | |
} | |
for _, value := range languages { | |
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value) | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai I don't know how to make changes can you suggest a solution?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Yashsharma1911 Sure, I'd be happy to guide you through the process of making changes to your code. Here are the steps:
- Open the
Maps/main.go
file in your code editor. - Locate the following lines of code:
for _ value := range languages {
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}
- Modify these lines to look like this:
for _, value := range languages {
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}
- Save the changes to the
Maps/main.go
file. - Commit these changes with a descriptive message, for example: "Fixed syntax error in for loop".
- Push the changes to your branch.
This will update the pull request with your new changes. The underscore and value
in the for
loop should be separated by a comma. This is because in Go, the range
keyword returns two values: the index and the value of the element at that index. If you don't need the index, you can ignore it with an underscore (_
), but you still need to include the comma.
Let me know if you need further assistance!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ohh thankyou
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderabbitai I closed this PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Yashsharma1911 Understood, if you've closed the PR and do not need to make further changes, that's completely fine. If you decide to revisit the changes or need help with anything else in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thankyou @Harsh4902 I implemented this AI to give auto review in case we are not able to any contributor seems good to me too, I added this configuration file with mindset this AI need it though I don't think so I'm closing this PR as it is not required I guess |
Added coderrabbit auto review AI
Summary by CodeRabbit
languages
slice in the main function to prevent compilation errors.