Add JWT Bearer authentication package #82
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new project, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant AuthService
participant WebSocket
Client->>Server: Initiate WebSocket connection
Server->>WebSocket: Accept connection
WebSocket->>Client: Request JWT token
Client->>WebSocket: Send JWT token
WebSocket->>AuthService: Authenticate(AuthenticationRequest)
AuthService-->>WebSocket: Validation result
WebSocket->>Server: Connection established
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/AspNetCore3JwtBearerExtensions.cs (1)
7-11: Consider enhancing the documentation with prerequisites.While the documentation is clear, it would be helpful to include:
- Prerequisites for using JWT bearer authentication
- Reference to required configuration in Startup.cs
- Link to JWT bearer authentication concepts
/// <summary> -/// Extension methods for adding JWT bearer authentication to a GraphQL server for WebSocket communications. +/// Extension methods for adding JWT bearer authentication to a GraphQL server for WebSocket communications. +/// Requires Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer to be configured in the application. +/// See https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/security/authentication/jwt-bearer for more information. /// </summary>src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/AuthenticationRequest.cs (2)
32-36: Add missing<value>tag in XML documentation.For consistency with other properties, consider adding a
<value>tag to document the property value./// <summary> /// Gets a list of the authentication schemes the authentication requirements are evaluated against. /// When no schemes are specified, the default authentication scheme is used. /// </summary> + /// <value> + /// An <see cref="IEnumerable{T}"/> of <see cref="string"/> containing the authentication scheme names. + /// </value> public IEnumerable<string> AuthenticationSchemes { get; }
1-48: Consider authentication scheme flexibility.The current design allows for multiple authentication schemes, which is good. However, consider adding documentation or examples showing how this flexibility can be used in common scenarios like:
- Fallback authentication schemes
- Multi-factor authentication
- Custom authentication scheme implementations
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/IAuthorizationOptions.cs (1)
12-16: Clarify nullability requirements for AuthenticationSchemesThe property is implicitly nullable but lacks explicit nullability annotation. Consider either:
- Making it non-nullable with an empty collection as default, or
- Explicitly marking it as nullable if null is a valid state
This helps consumers better understand the contract and enables proper null checking.
- List<string> AuthenticationSchemes { get; set; } + IReadOnlyList<string> AuthenticationSchemes { get; set; } = Array.Empty<string>();GraphQL.AspNetCore3.sln (1)
54-55: Consider adding a JWT authentication sample project.Since this introduces JWT Bearer authentication functionality, it would be valuable to add a sample project demonstrating its usage, similar to other authentication samples in the solution (e.g., AuthorizationSample).
Would you like me to help create a sample project demonstrating JWT Bearer authentication integration?
migration.md (3)
9-12: Documentation improvements neededA few suggestions to enhance clarity:
- Remove the hyphen in "separately-provided"
- Consider adding a code example showing how to install and configure the package
- Consider listing the specific options inherited from
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearerWould you like me to help draft these documentation improvements?
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: The hyphen in separately-provided is redundant.
Context: ... JWT WebSocket Authentication using the separately-providedGraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearerpackage...(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)
16-17: Enhance breaking changes documentationConsider adding:
- Code examples showing the before/after changes for both breaking changes
- Migration steps for existing implementations
- Example of the new
AuthenticationRequestclass structureExample structure:
### Breaking changes - `AuthenticationSchemes` property added to `IAuthorizationOptions` interface: ```csharp // Before public interface IAuthorizationOptions { // ... existing properties } // After public interface IAuthorizationOptions { string[] AuthenticationSchemes { get; set; } // ... existing properties }
IWebSocketAuthenticationService.AuthenticateAsyncparameters refactored:// Before Task<ClaimsPrincipal> AuthenticateAsync(string token, string scheme); // After Task<ClaimsPrincipal> AuthenticateAsync(AuthenticationRequest request);Migration Steps
- Update your
IAuthorizationOptionsimplementations to include the new property- Refactor
AuthenticateAsynccalls to use the newAuthenticationRequestclassWould you like me to help draft these documentation improvements? --- `3-17`: **Consider restructuring the migration guide** The migration guide would benefit from a more structured approach: 1. Add a "Quick Start" section showing how to migrate from v6 to v7 2. Include a "Troubleshooting" section for common migration issues 3. Add cross-references to related documentation Consider following the documentation structure used in other major frameworks like ASP.NET Core, which typically includes: - Quick start guide - Detailed feature documentation - Migration steps - Troubleshooting guide - API reference Would you like assistance in restructuring the documentation? <details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary> [uncategorized] ~9-~9: The hyphen in separately-provided is redundant. Context: ... JWT WebSocket Authentication using the separately-provided `GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer` package... (ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX) </details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/SubscriptionsTransportWs/SubscriptionServer.cs (1)</summary><blockquote> `245-245`: **Consider using named parameters for better maintainability** The `AuthenticationRequest` constructor call uses positional parameters. Consider using named parameters for better code maintainability and readability. ```diff -await _authenticationService.AuthenticateAsync(new(Connection, SubProtocol, message, _authenticationSchemes)); +await _authenticationService.AuthenticateAsync(new AuthenticationRequest( + connection: Connection, + subProtocol: SubProtocol, + message: message, + authenticationSchemes: _authenticationSchemes));src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/BaseSubscriptionServer.cs (3)
Line range hint
12-15: Consider enhancing thread-safety documentationWhile the documentation mentions thread-safety requirements, it could be more specific about which operations are thread-safe and which aren't. This is particularly important for WebSocket implementations where concurrent message processing is common.
Consider adding this clarification:
/// <remarks> -/// All methods except <see cref="OnMessageReceivedAsync(OperationMessage)">OnMessageReceivedAsync</see> should be thread-safe. +/// All methods except <see cref="OnMessageReceivedAsync(OperationMessage)">OnMessageReceivedAsync</see> should be thread-safe. +/// This ensures concurrent operations like authentication, subscription management, and message dispatching +/// can be handled safely in a multi-threaded environment. /// <see cref="OnMessageReceivedAsync(OperationMessage)">OnMessageReceivedAsync</see> will receive an ordered /// sequence of messages from the client, dispatched by <see cref="IWebSocketConnection"/>. /// </remarks>
Line range hint
279-321: Consider splitting the OnConnectionInitAsync methodThe obsolete method contains complex keep-alive logic that's now moved to a separate method. However, the new implementation still mixes connection initialization with keep-alive setup. Consider further separation of concerns.
Consider refactoring like this:
-protected virtual async Task OnConnectionInitAsync(OperationMessage message) +protected virtual async Task OnConnectionInitAsync(OperationMessage message) +{ + if (!await AuthorizeAsync(message)) + return; + + if (!await InitializeConnectionAsync(message)) + return; + + await StartKeepAliveAsync(); +} + +private async Task<bool> InitializeConnectionAsync(OperationMessage message) +{ + await OnConnectionAcknowledgeAsync(message); + return TryInitialize(); +} + +private Task StartKeepAliveAsync() { - if (!await AuthorizeAsync(message)) { - return; - } - await OnConnectionAcknowledgeAsync(message); - if (!TryInitialize()) - return; - - _ = OnKeepAliveLoopAsync(); + return OnKeepAliveLoopAsync(); }
Line range hint
486-489: Consider enhancing error handling for subscription errorsThe
HandleErrorDuringSubscribeAsyncmethod currently wraps all exceptions in a genericUnhandledError. Consider providing more specific error handling for authentication-related exceptions.-protected virtual Task<ExecutionError> HandleErrorDuringSubscribeAsync(OperationMessage message, Exception ex) - => Task.FromResult<ExecutionError>(new UnhandledError("Unable to set up subscription for the requested field.", ex)); +protected virtual Task<ExecutionError> HandleErrorDuringSubscribeAsync(OperationMessage message, Exception ex) +{ + return Task.FromResult<ExecutionError>(ex switch + { + AuthenticationException authEx => new ExecutionError("Authentication failed", authEx), + UnauthorizedAccessException authEx => new ExecutionError("Authorization failed", authEx), + _ => new UnhandledError("Unable to set up subscription for the requested field.", ex) + }); +}README.md (1)
431-447: Consider enhancing the configuration example.While the example is functional, it could be more comprehensive by:
- Including a comment explaining the purpose of
AddJwtBearer()configuration- Showing how to configure JWT options (e.g., issuer, audience, etc.)
Here's a suggested enhancement:
builder.Services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme) - .AddJwtBearer(); + .AddJwtBearer(options => + { + // Configure JWT Bearer auth options + options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters + { + ValidateIssuer = true, + ValidateAudience = true, + ValidateLifetime = true, + ValidateIssuerSigningKey = true, + ValidIssuer = "your_issuer", + ValidAudience = "your_audience", + IssuerSigningKey = new SymmetricSecurityKey(/* your key */) + }; + });src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs (1)
97-100: Consider logging exceptions during token validation for troubleshootingThe
catchblocks at lines 97-100, 114-117, and 124-127 silently swallow exceptions during authentication. While it's important to prevent exceptions from disrupting the authentication flow, logging these exceptions at an appropriate log level (e.g., debug or trace) can aid in diagnosing authentication issues without affecting production performance.Consider adding logging statements within the
catchblocks:catch (Exception ex) { // Log the exception for debugging purposes // Example: // logger.LogDebug(ex, "Token validation failed."); // Existing comment can remain }Note: Ensure that any sensitive information is not exposed in the logs.
Also applies to: 114-117, 124-127
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
GraphQL.AspNetCore3.sln(2 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)migration.md(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/AspNetCore3JwtBearerExtensions.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer.csproj(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/IAuthorizationOptions.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/AuthenticationRequest.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/BaseSubscriptionServer.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/GraphQLWs/SubscriptionServer.cs(4 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/IWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/SubscriptionsTransportWs/SubscriptionServer.cs(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer.csproj
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
migration.md
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: The hyphen in separately-provided is redundant.
Context: ... JWT WebSocket Authentication using the separately-provided GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer package...
(ADVERB_LY_HYPHEN_FIX)
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/AspNetCore3JwtBearerExtensions.cs (2)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are appropriate and necessary.
The imports cover all required namespaces for JWT bearer authentication integration.
15-19: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add parameter validation and consider additional configuration options.
Several improvements could enhance the robustness and flexibility of this implementation:
- The
builderparameter should be validated - Consider adding an overload that accepts JWT configuration options
- The service registration should be verified
public static IGraphQLBuilder AddJwtBearerAuthentication(this IGraphQLBuilder builder)
{
+ if (builder == null)
+ throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(builder));
+
builder.AddWebSocketAuthentication<JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService>();
return builder;
}Let's verify if the JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService is properly registered:
Consider adding an overload that allows customization of JWT options:
public static IGraphQLBuilder AddJwtBearerAuthentication(
this IGraphQLBuilder builder,
Action<JwtBearerOptions> configureOptions)
{
if (builder == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(builder));
if (configureOptions == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(configureOptions));
builder.Services.Configure(configureOptions);
builder.AddWebSocketAuthentication<JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService>();
return builder;
}src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/IWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs (2)
14-20: Documentation is clear and comprehensive!
The updated documentation effectively explains the authentication flow and properly references the new AuthenticationRequest parameter. The additional context about authorization configuration is particularly helpful.
21-21: Verify implementations of this breaking change
The method signature change from individual parameters to AuthenticationRequest is a breaking change that will require updates to all implementing classes.
Let's verify all implementations are updated:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if there are any implementations of the new signature.
Breaking change has been properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The interface
IWebSocketAuthenticationServicehas been updated with the new signature usingAuthenticationRequest - The implementation
JwtWebSocketAuthenticationServicehas been updated to match the new signature - The old signature appears only in test files and documentation, which is expected during a breaking change
- Migration documentation properly notes this breaking change
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all implementations of IWebSocketAuthenticationService
# and verify they've been updated to the new signature
# Find all implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : $$$IWebSocketAuthenticationService$$$'
# Search for any old method signatures that might have been missed
rg "AuthenticateAsync.*IWebSocketConnection.*OperationMessage"
Length of output: 1212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find implementations of the new signature
rg "AuthenticateAsync.*AuthenticationRequest"
# Find all .cs files that might contain implementations
fd "WebSocketAuthenticationService.cs"
Length of output: 1263
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/AuthenticationRequest.cs (1)
1-6: LGTM! Clear and well-documented class declaration.
The class purpose is well-defined and the documentation follows standard XML documentation practices.
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/IAuthorizationOptions.cs (1)
12-16: Verify integration with existing authorization mechanisms
The new AuthenticationSchemes property introduces flexibility in authentication scheme selection. Let's verify its interaction with existing authorization mechanisms.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can now generate the final response:
Authentication scheme integration is properly implemented
The AuthenticationSchemes property is well-integrated across the codebase:
- Implemented in
GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptionswhich is the primary implementation ofIAuthorizationOptions - Properly utilized in WebSocket-related components (
BaseSubscriptionServer,SubscriptionServer) - Correctly handled in both GraphQL-WS and Subscriptions-Transport-WS protocols
- Covered in authorization tests (
AuthorizationTests.cs)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage patterns of IAuthorizationOptions to ensure proper integration
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : IAuthorizationOptions {
$$$
}'
# Look for existing authentication scheme handling
rg -l "AuthenticationSchemes" --type cs
# Check for potential breaking changes in tests
rg "AuthorizationOptions" --type cs -C 3
Length of output: 7704
GraphQL.AspNetCore3.sln (1)
54-55: LGTM! Project structure is well-configured.
The new JWT Bearer authentication project is properly integrated into the solution with correct project type, GUID, and build configurations.
Also applies to: 110-113
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/SubscriptionsTransportWs/SubscriptionServer.cs (4)
9-9: LGTM: Field addition follows best practices
The new field is properly encapsulated as private readonly and follows C# naming conventions.
73-73: LGTM: Constructor initialization is correct
The field initialization is properly placed and relies on the base constructor's validation of authorizationOptions.
Line range hint 227-239: LGTM: Documentation is comprehensive and accurate
The XML documentation clearly describes the authentication flow, return value, and behavior.
244-246: Verify the authentication service implementation
Let's verify the implementation of IWebSocketAuthenticationService and its usage of AuthenticationRequest.
✅ Verification successful
Authentication changes are properly implemented and maintain backward compatibility
The changes to the authentication flow are verified and correct:
- The new
AuthenticationRequestclass properly encapsulates all necessary authentication parameters (connection, subprotocol, operation message, and authentication schemes) - The interface
IWebSocketAuthenticationServicehas been updated to use the new request object while maintaining its core functionality - The JWT implementation (
JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService) correctly handles the new authentication request format - The changes maintain backward compatibility with existing authentication schemes and token validation
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation of IWebSocketAuthenticationService and AuthenticationRequest
# Find the interface definition
echo "=== IWebSocketAuthenticationService interface ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IWebSocketAuthenticationService {
$$$
}'
# Find implementations of the interface
echo -e "\n=== Implementations of IWebSocketAuthenticationService ==="
rg "class.*:.*IWebSocketAuthenticationService" -A 5
# Find usages of AuthenticationRequest
echo -e "\n=== Usages of AuthenticationRequest ==="
rg "new AuthenticationRequest|new \(.*AuthenticationRequest\)" -A 2
Length of output: 2191
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for the AuthenticationRequest class definition and its usages
# Find AuthenticationRequest class definition
echo "=== AuthenticationRequest class definition ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'class AuthenticationRequest {
$$$
}'
# Find interface method signature
echo -e "\n=== IWebSocketAuthenticationService method signature ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IWebSocketAuthenticationService {
$$$
AuthenticateAsync($$$)
$$$
}'
# Find all usages of AuthenticateAsync
echo -e "\n=== AuthenticateAsync implementations and usages ==="
rg "AuthenticateAsync.*\(" -A 3
# Check for any recent changes to authentication-related files
echo -e "\n=== Authentication-related files ==="
fd -e cs -e md authentication -i
Length of output: 8360
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the AuthenticationRequest class and recent changes
# Check AuthenticationRequest class content
echo "=== AuthenticationRequest class content ==="
cat src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/AuthenticationRequest.cs
# Check the interface content
echo -e "\n=== IWebSocketAuthenticationService interface content ==="
cat src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/IWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs
# Check JWT implementation
echo -e "\n=== JWT Authentication Service implementation ==="
cat src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs
Length of output: 12532
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/GraphQLWs/SubscriptionServer.cs (3)
9-9: LGTM: Authentication schemes field properly added and initialized
The new field _authenticationSchemes is correctly implemented as readonly and properly initialized from the authorization options.
Also applies to: 80-80
Line range hint 310-327: LGTM: Documentation accurately reflects the new authentication flow
The XML documentation is well-written and thoroughly describes the updated authentication process, including the new AuthenticationRequest parameter.
328-328: Verify authentication flow implementation
Let's verify the complete authentication flow implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Authentication flow implementation is properly structured and secure
The verification shows a well-implemented authentication flow:
AuthenticationRequestclass properly encapsulates connection, protocol, and authentication schemes- JWT authentication service correctly handles token validation and principal creation
- Authentication schemes are properly propagated from middleware to WebSocket authentication
- The implementation includes fallback to default authentication schemes when none are specified
- The code maintains security by validating tokens and properly setting the HttpContext.User
The changes in the review are consistent with the existing authentication architecture and maintain the security of the system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the authentication flow implementation
# Check for AuthenticationRequest implementation
echo "Checking AuthenticationRequest implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class AuthenticationRequest {
$$$
public IEnumerable<string> AuthenticationSchemes { get; }
$$$
}'
# Check for authentication scheme handling in related services
echo "Checking authentication scheme handling..."
rg -l "AuthenticationSchemes" --type cs
Length of output: 845
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the AuthenticationRequest implementation and authentication flow
# Check AuthenticationRequest implementation
echo "=== AuthenticationRequest Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "class AuthenticationRequest" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/AuthenticationRequest.cs
# Check authentication service implementations
echo -e "\n=== Authentication Service Implementations ==="
rg -A 10 "class.*AuthenticationService" --type cs
# Check how authentication schemes are used in middleware
echo -e "\n=== Authentication Schemes Usage in Middleware ==="
rg -B 2 -A 5 "AuthenticationSchemes" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddleware.cs
# Check JWT authentication implementation
echo -e "\n=== JWT Authentication Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "AuthenticateAsync" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs
Length of output: 6728
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/WebSockets/BaseSubscriptionServer.cs (2)
198-201: Documentation update aligns with new authentication flow
The updated documentation correctly guides implementers to use the new AuthenticateAsync(AuthenticationRequest) method, which is part of the JWT Bearer authentication enhancement. This change maintains consistency with the PR's objective of adding JWT authentication support.
Line range hint 203-267: Verify authorization flow integration with JWT Bearer
The AuthorizeAsync method is crucial for the new JWT Bearer authentication. While the implementation looks correct, we should verify its integration with the new authentication package.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the JWT Bearer authentication implementation to verify its integration with the authorization flow.
JWT Bearer authentication integration is properly implemented and verified
The authorization flow in BaseSubscriptionServer is correctly integrated with JWT Bearer authentication. The implementation includes:
- Proper JWT token validation and claims principal setup in
JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService - Integration through the
AddJwtBearerAuthenticationextension method - Token validation using standard JWT validation parameters
- Correct user context propagation to
HttpContext.User
The authorization checks in AuthorizeAsync will work seamlessly with the JWT authentication as it relies on the standard ASP.NET Core authentication/authorization mechanisms.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for JWT Bearer authentication integration
echo "Checking for JWT Bearer authentication implementation..."
# Look for JWT authentication service implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : IWebSocketAuthenticationService {
$$$
AuthenticateAsync(AuthenticationRequest $_) {
$$$
}
}'
# Look for JWT configuration setup
rg -A 5 "UseJwtBearerAuthentication|AddJwtBearer"
Length of output: 3132
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check JWT WebSocket authentication service implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService {
$$$
}'
# Check for any JWT-related authentication tests
rg -A 5 "WebSocket.*[Aa]uthentic.*[Tt]est|[Tt]est.*WebSocket.*[Aa]uthentic"
# Look for JWT token validation in the authentication service
rg -A 10 "AuthenticateAsync.*WebSocket|ValidateToken"
Length of output: 9179
README.md (2)
425-430: LGTM! Clear introduction to JWT Bearer authentication.
The documentation clearly introduces the JWT Bearer authentication package and its functionality.
449-456: LGTM! Important limitations are clearly documented.
The documentation properly highlights two important notes:
- The need to specify the authentication scheme when JWT Bearer is not the default
- The current limitation regarding JwtBearerEvents
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs (1)
136-150: Verify conditional compilation blocks for correctness
In the SetupTokenValidationParametersAsync method, ensure that the conditional compilation directives (#if NET8_0_OR_GREATER, #else, #endif) correctly encapsulate the code blocks for different .NET target frameworks. Pay special attention to the opening and closing braces { } within these blocks to prevent syntax errors when compiling under different target frameworks.
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-150: Consider documenting JWT-specific security considerations.Since this class is being enhanced to support JWT Bearer authentication, consider adding XML documentation comments that:
- Explain the interaction between JWT Bearer and other authentication schemes
- Document any specific CSRF considerations when using JWT Bearer authentication
- Provide guidance on secure WebSocket authentication with JWTs
This will help users implement the authentication securely.
src/Tests/ChatTests.cs (2)
316-319: Simplify theReturnsmethod by removing redundant type parameterThe generic type parameter
<AuthenticationRequest>inReturns<AuthenticationRequest>(...)is unnecessary because the compiler can infer the type from the lambda expression. You can simplify the code by removing it.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- mockAuthorizationService.Setup(x => x.AuthenticateAsync(It.IsAny<AuthenticationRequest>())).Returns<AuthenticationRequest>(request => { + mockAuthorizationService.Setup(x => x.AuthenticateAsync(It.IsAny<AuthenticationRequest>())).Returns(request => {
359-363: Simplify theReturnsmethod by removing redundant type parameterThe generic type parameter
<AuthenticationRequest>inReturns<AuthenticationRequest>(...)is unnecessary because the compiler can infer the type from the lambda expression. You can simplify the code by removing it.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- mockAuthorizationService.Setup(x => x.AuthenticateAsync(It.IsAny<AuthenticationRequest>())) - .Returns<AuthenticationRequest>((authenticationRequest) => { + mockAuthorizationService.Setup(x => x.AuthenticateAsync(It.IsAny<AuthenticationRequest>())) + .Returns((authenticationRequest) => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs(1 hunks)src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/IAuthorizationOptions.cs(1 hunks)src/Tests.ApiApprovals/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.approved.txt(3 hunks)src/Tests/BuilderMethodTests.cs(3 hunks)src/Tests/ChatTests.cs(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs
- src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/IAuthorizationOptions.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/Tests.ApiApprovals/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.approved.txt
[duplication] ~279-~279: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ..., string subProtocol, GraphQL.Transport.OperationMessage operationMessage, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~282-~282: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...get; } public GraphQL.Transport.OperationMessage OperationMessage { get; } public string SubProto...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~350-~350: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ateAsync(GraphQL.AspNetCore3.WebSockets.AuthenticationRequest authenticationRequest); } public interface IWebSocket...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs (1)
102-103: LGTM! Verify interface implementation completeness.
The explicit interface implementation for IAuthorizationOptions.AuthenticationSchemes is correct and follows the established pattern in the class.
Let's verify that all members of IAuthorizationOptions are properly implemented:
✅ Verification successful
Interface implementation is complete and correct
Based on the verification results, the class implements all members of IAuthorizationOptions correctly:
AuthenticationSchemes- Explicit implementation returning the backing propertyAuthorizationRequired- Implemented as a public propertyAuthorizedPolicy- Implemented as a public nullable string propertyAuthorizedRoles- Explicit implementation returning the backing property
The explicit interface implementation for AuthenticationSchemes follows the same pattern as AuthorizedRoles and maintains consistency with the rest of the class implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all IAuthorizationOptions members are implemented
# Expected: All interface members should have corresponding implementations
# Search for the interface definition and its members
ast-grep --pattern 'interface IAuthorizationOptions {
$$$
}'
# Search for all implementations in the options class
ast-grep --pattern 'class GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions : IAuthorizationOptions {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the interface and implementation
# First, let's find files containing IAuthorizationOptions
rg "IAuthorizationOptions" -l
# Then let's look at the actual interface definition
rg "interface IAuthorizationOptions" -A 10
# And find all explicit interface implementations
rg "IAuthorizationOptions\." -A 1
Length of output: 3402
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of all interface members in GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions
# Search for AuthorizationRequired implementation
rg "AuthorizationRequired" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs -B 1 -A 1
# Search for AuthorizedPolicy implementation
rg "AuthorizedPolicy" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs -B 1 -A 1
# Search for the backing properties
rg "public \w+ (AuthenticationSchemes|AuthorizationRequired|AuthorizedPolicy|AuthorizedRoles)" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs
Length of output: 527
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the remaining properties and their implementations
rg "AuthenticationSchemes" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs -B 1 -A 1
rg "AuthorizedRoles" src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs -B 1 -A 1
# Let's also verify if there are any other explicit interface implementations
rg "bool IAuthorizationOptions\." src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs
rg "string\? IAuthorizationOptions\." src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3/GraphQLHttpMiddlewareOptions.cs
Length of output: 806
src/Tests/BuilderMethodTests.cs (1)
74-74: LGTM!
The updated method signature aligns with the interface changes, and throwing NotImplementedException is appropriate for these test scenarios.
src/Tests.ApiApprovals/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.approved.txt (3)
Line range hint 198-204: LGTM! Well-designed interface enhancement.
The addition of AuthenticationSchemes property to IAuthorizationOptions interface provides good flexibility for supporting multiple authentication schemes.
277-284: LGTM! Well-structured authentication request class.
The new AuthenticationRequest class follows good design principles:
- Immutable design with read-only properties
- Clear parameter organization
- Strong typing with non-nullable parameters
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~279-~279: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ..., string subProtocol, GraphQL.Transport.OperationMessage operationMessage, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[duplication] ~282-~282: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...get; } public GraphQL.Transport.OperationMessage OperationMessage { get; } public string SubProto...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
350-350: LGTM! API improvement with breaking change.
The updated AuthenticateAsync method signature in IWebSocketAuthenticationService improves the API design by using the new AuthenticationRequest parameter. Note that this is a breaking change requiring updates to existing implementations.
✅ Verification successful
Breaking change verified with one implementation requiring updates
The breaking change in IWebSocketAuthenticationService.AuthenticateAsync is confirmed. Found:
- One concrete implementation in
JwtWebSocketAuthenticationServicethat has been updated to use the newAuthenticationRequestparameter - Interface is used in both GraphQL WebSocket subscription servers
- Migration guide documents this breaking change
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find implementations of IWebSocketAuthenticationService that need updates
# Search for implementations of the interface
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : $$$, IWebSocketAuthenticationService, $$$'
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find implementations
# First, let's find all files containing IWebSocketAuthenticationService
rg "IWebSocketAuthenticationService" -l
# Then let's look for any class implementing AuthenticateAsync
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
AuthenticateAsync($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Also search for the old implementation pattern to understand the breaking change
rg "AuthenticateAsync" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 13999
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~350-~350: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Context: ...ateAsync(GraphQL.AspNetCore3.WebSockets.AuthenticationRequest authenticationRequest); } public interface IWebSocket...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
| @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ public void WebSocketAuthenticationService_Typed() | |||
| services.AddGraphQL(b => b.AddWebSocketAuthentication<MyWebSocketAuthenticationService>()); | |||
| using var provider = services.BuildServiceProvider(); | |||
| var service = provider.GetRequiredService<IWebSocketAuthenticationService>(); | |||
| Should.Throw<NotImplementedException>(() => service.AuthenticateAsync(null!, null!, null!)); | |||
| Should.Throw<NotImplementedException>(() => service.AuthenticateAsync(null!)); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test cases with proper AuthenticationRequest objects
The current tests pass null! to AuthenticateAsync, which could mask potential issues. Consider creating proper AuthenticationRequest objects to make the tests more robust and meaningful.
Here's a suggested improvement:
-Should.Throw<NotImplementedException>(() => service.AuthenticateAsync(null!));
+var request = new AuthenticationRequest
+{
+ Connection = Mock.Of<IWebSocketConnection>(),
+ SubProtocol = "graphql-ws",
+ OperationMessage = new OperationMessage { Type = "connection_init" }
+};
+Should.Throw<NotImplementedException>(() => service.AuthenticateAsync(request));Also applies to: 59-59, 69-69
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12089903079Details
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/Tests/JwtBearer/AspNetCore3JwtBearerExtensionsTests.cs (3)
8-9: Consider expanding test coverage and improving test name specificityThe current test name could be more specific about what it's verifying. Consider renaming it to better reflect the exact behavior being tested, such as
AddJwtBearerAuthentication_ShouldRegisterSingletonJwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.Additionally, consider adding tests for:
- Edge cases where the service is already registered
- Scenarios where the builder or services are null
- Verification that the service can't be registered with a different lifetime
36-42: Consider adding explicit lifetime verificationWhile the test verifies the service registration parameters, it might be valuable to add an explicit assertion for the singleton lifetime requirement.
Add an additional verification:
serviceRegisterMock.Verify( x => x.Register( typeof(IWebSocketAuthenticationService), typeof(JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService), ServiceLifetime.Singleton, false), Times.Once); + // Verify that registration with different lifetime is not allowed + serviceRegisterMock.Verify( + x => x.Register( + typeof(IWebSocketAuthenticationService), + typeof(JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService), + It.Is<ServiceLifetime>(l => l != ServiceLifetime.Singleton), + It.IsAny<bool>()), + Times.Never);
23-25: Consider allowing custom WebSocket authentication implementationsThe current implementation tightly couples JWT authentication with WebSocket authentication. Consider providing an interface or extension point that allows users to implement custom WebSocket authentication mechanisms while maintaining JWT as the default.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs(1 hunks)src/Tests/JwtBearer/AspNetCore3JwtBearerExtensionsTests.cs(1 hunks)src/Tests/Tests.csproj(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/JwtWebSocketAuthenticationService.cs
| using GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer; | ||
| using ServiceLifetime = GraphQL.DI.ServiceLifetime; | ||
|
|
||
| namespace Tests.JwtBearer; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing test framework imports
The file is missing essential imports for the testing frameworks being used:
Add these imports at the top of the file:
using GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer;
using ServiceLifetime = GraphQL.DI.ServiceLifetime;
+using Xunit;
+using Moq;
+using Shouldly;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer; | |
| using ServiceLifetime = GraphQL.DI.ServiceLifetime; | |
| namespace Tests.JwtBearer; | |
| using GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer; | |
| using ServiceLifetime = GraphQL.DI.ServiceLifetime; | |
| using Xunit; | |
| using Moq; | |
| using Shouldly; | |
| namespace Tests.JwtBearer; |
| @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ | |||
| </ItemGroup> | |||
|
|
|||
| <ItemGroup> | |||
| <ProjectReference Include="..\GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer\GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer.csproj" /> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Framework compatibility issue detected
The JWT Bearer project targets netstandard2.0;netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp3.1;net6.0;net8.0, while the Tests project requires net48;netcoreapp2.1;netcoreapp3.1;net5.0;net6.0;net8.0. There are two mismatches:
- Tests project requires
net48(on Windows) which is not supported by the JWT Bearer project - Tests project requires
net5.0which is not supported by the JWT Bearer project
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify framework compatibility.
The project reference is correctly placed within the appropriate ItemGroup. However, since this test project targets multiple frameworks (net48 through net8.0), we should verify that the new JWT Bearer project supports all these target frameworks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify target frameworks in the new JWT Bearer project
# Expected: Should support all frameworks targeted by the test project
# Check target frameworks in the JWT Bearer project
cat "../GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer.csproj" | grep -A 5 "<TargetFrameworks>"
Length of output: 210
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path of the JWT Bearer project
fd -e csproj JwtBearer
# Then check the target frameworks in the Tests project for comparison
fd -e csproj Tests.csproj --exec cat {} | grep -A 5 "<TargetFrameworks>"
Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now let's check the target frameworks in the JWT Bearer project
cat src/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer/GraphQL.AspNetCore3.JwtBearer.csproj | grep -A 5 "<TargetFrameworks\|<TargetFramework"
Length of output: 370
Coverage Report
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Enhancements
AuthenticationRequestclass.Bug Fixes
Refactor
AuthenticationRequestfor improved clarity and structure.