-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add script to fit NET vs. PWV #1
Open
PaulKGrimes
wants to merge
39
commits into
SAT_PBDRv4
Choose a base branch
from
main
base: SAT_PBDRv4
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Hi Paul, just wanna make sure you have all the keys you need for this repo. |
Hi, yes, I've been able to commit branches, etc. to the repo.
I'm working some substantial updates to the SAT models, bringing the PBDR
runs for SATs up to v4 (HDPE optics at HF), and then on AoA for the SATs
team, so I'm working in branches for now. I have made some improvements to
the various Jupyter notebooks, particularly the Comparisons one - which can
now compare multiple models.
In parallel, I've had to make some fixes to bolo-calc, to get it to run
correctly on my Windows Anaconda set ups, and to distribute the PKL
aperture files with the package. Those are all tested on both linux and
windows, and I have a pull request open on that repo.
Thanks,
Paul
…On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 4:49 PM Eric Charles ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi Paul, just wanna make sure you have all the keys you need for this repo.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSLE6D44CITRRLPOVGLVL7PT7ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Receiver Laboratory
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
+1 (617) 496-7640
|
Do you need the keys for bolo-calc? I think it is in KIPAC space for historical reasons.
…-e
On May 26, 2022, at 1:57 PM, Paul Grimes ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, yes, I've been able to commit branches, etc. to the repo.
I'm working some substantial updates to the SAT models, bringing the PBDR
runs for SATs up to v4 (HDPE optics at HF), and then on AoA for the SATs
team, so I'm working in branches for now. I have made some improvements to
the various Jupyter notebooks, particularly the Comparisons one - which can
now compare multiple models.
In parallel, I've had to make some fixes to bolo-calc, to get it to run
correctly on my Windows Anaconda set ups, and to distribute the PKL
aperture files with the package. Those are all tested on both linux and
windows, and I have a pull request open on that repo.
Thanks,
Paul
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 4:49 PM Eric Charles ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Hi Paul, just wanna make sure you have all the keys you need for this repo.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#1 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSLE6D44CITRRLPOVGLVL7PT7ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
--
Receiver Laboratory
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
+1 (617) 496-7640
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRIGIU7TZASKO2T5GVCHQLVL7QR3ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ>.
You are receiving this because you commented.
|
Ok, I invited you to the bolo-calc repo. Feel free to do what ever you need.
The github actions might be useful, e.g., for automated linting and it at least runs a couple of simple tests.
…-e
On May 26, 2022, at 2:01 PM, Eric Charles ***@***.***> wrote:
Do you need the keys for bolo-calc? I think it is in KIPAC space for historical reasons.
-e
> On May 26, 2022, at 1:57 PM, Paul Grimes ***@***.*** ***@***.***>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, yes, I've been able to commit branches, etc. to the repo.
>
> I'm working some substantial updates to the SAT models, bringing the PBDR
> runs for SATs up to v4 (HDPE optics at HF), and then on AoA for the SATs
> team, so I'm working in branches for now. I have made some improvements to
> the various Jupyter notebooks, particularly the Comparisons one - which can
> now compare multiple models.
>
> In parallel, I've had to make some fixes to bolo-calc, to get it to run
> correctly on my Windows Anaconda set ups, and to distribute the PKL
> aperture files with the package. Those are all tested on both linux and
> windows, and I have a pull request open on that repo.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 4:49 PM Eric Charles ***@***.***>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Paul, just wanna make sure you have all the keys you need for this repo.
> >
> > —
> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> > <#1 (comment) <#1 (comment)>>,
> > or unsubscribe
> > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSLE6D44CITRRLPOVGLVL7PT7ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSLE6D44CITRRLPOVGLVL7PT7ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ>>
> > .
> > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> > ***@***.***>
> >
>
>
> --
> Receiver Laboratory
> Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
> 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
> +1 (617) 496-7640
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRIGIU7TZASKO2T5GVCHQLVL7QR3ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ>.
> You are receiving this because you commented.
>
|
Thanks!
I'll try not to break anything :)
Paul
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 5:14 PM Eric Charles ***@***.***>
wrote:
… Ok, I invited you to the bolo-calc repo. Feel free to do what ever you
need.
The github actions might be useful, e.g., for automated linting and it at
least runs a couple of simple tests.
-e
> On May 26, 2022, at 2:01 PM, Eric Charles ***@***.***> wrote:
>
> Do you need the keys for bolo-calc? I think it is in KIPAC space for
historical reasons.
>
> -e
>
>> On May 26, 2022, at 1:57 PM, Paul Grimes ***@***.*** ***@***.***>>
wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi, yes, I've been able to commit branches, etc. to the repo.
>>
>> I'm working some substantial updates to the SAT models, bringing the
PBDR
>> runs for SATs up to v4 (HDPE optics at HF), and then on AoA for the SATs
>> team, so I'm working in branches for now. I have made some improvements
to
>> the various Jupyter notebooks, particularly the Comparisons one - which
can
>> now compare multiple models.
>>
>> In parallel, I've had to make some fixes to bolo-calc, to get it to run
>> correctly on my Windows Anaconda set ups, and to distribute the PKL
>> aperture files with the package. Those are all tested on both linux and
>> windows, and I have a pull request open on that repo.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 4:49 PM Eric Charles ***@***.***>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Paul, just wanna make sure you have all the keys you need for this
repo.
>> >
>> > —
>> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> > <
#1 (comment) <
#1 (comment)>>,
>> > or unsubscribe
>> > <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSLE6D44CITRRLPOVGLVL7PT7ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ
<
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSLE6D44CITRRLPOVGLVL7PT7ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ
>>
>> > .
>> > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
>> > ***@***.***>
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Receiver Laboratory
>> Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
>> 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
>> +1 (617) 496-7640
>> —
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <
#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADRIGIU7TZASKO2T5GVCHQLVL7QR3ANCNFSM5W26WWMQ
>.
>> You are receiving this because you commented.
>>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGT6ZSK4E3MZJ7W37TYE7LLVL7SVDANCNFSM5W26WWMQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
Receiver Laboratory
Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA 02138
+1 (617) 496-7640
|
…requency between LF_1 and LF_2
…odule optical efficiency
…ote out new tomls.
SO-like design but with larger optics
Note that the Phase 2 configuration label in the toml file is "Chile_aggr"
Add non-split band configuration. MF2 field is the non-split MF band.
Add a phase 2 configuration with non-split bands (MF2 bands are the non-split MF2 bands)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.