You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So far, we have only looked at publishers where the vast majority or all of their publications are openly licensed. Increasingly, there is openly licensed content elsewhere as well, so it would make sense for the workflows to be more inclusive of different journals or publishers.
What would be good criteria for this? I imagine that http://jats4r.org/ and its schematrons could play a role, but they do not yet cover all the tags that we are working with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So far, we have only looked at publishers where the vast majority or all of their publications are openly licensed. Increasingly, there is openly licensed content elsewhere as well, so it would make sense for the workflows to be more inclusive of different journals or publishers.
What would be good criteria for this? I imagine that http://jats4r.org/ and its schematrons could play a role, but they do not yet cover all the tags that we are working with.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: