You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Intellectual property: we can be sure that our published documents are correctly licensed
Allows us to actually publish standard documents from a recognized body
may increase trust in the work we do
Possible venue change
Dan proposes ECMA
Andreu: what is the bar for becoming an Invited Expert?
Dan: this is generally possible, but it is less inclusive.
Andreu: patent policy requires legal names - this can pose inclusivity issues.
Dan: this can be worked around, for example in tc39 legal names are only know to a very limited number of people that have to deal with the legal work related to Invited Experts / members. Not known to members in general.
Some discussion about WinterCG (community group) vs TC/WG and a standards body
Luca: I think there is a place for both, especially because a lot of the work we do is destined to end up in a different standard bodies existing specifications (fetch, crypto, etc). The CG would continue to hold all meetings and incubate ideas. Technical work related to standardization could then happen in the relevant upstream bodies, or our own TC/WG for first-party standards we'd like to publish (e.g Sockets or common minimum).
Owen: the Web Components CG at W3C operates in this fashion, and it works well. This is something we should consider too.
Common minimum api
How to get Node.js more actively involved?
Some discussion on navigator.userAgent
Node TSC x WinterCG meeting
@legendecas will schedule this, look for an issue with a Doodle on the admin repo soon.
We're meeting at 14:30 UTC today, as usual. Please add agenda topics below:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: