Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update WG documentation to reflect change in status of default registry format materials #817

Open
aphillips opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Update WG documentation to reflect change in status of default registry format materials #817

aphillips opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@aphillips
Labels
Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG documentation Improvements or additions to documentation editorial resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.

Comments

@aphillips
Copy link
Member

The WG decided in the 2024-07-01 call not to support the DTD for the function registry as a normative part of the specification. We need to update our various non-normative descriptive bits around the repo. @eemeli has already posted a PR for fixing the normative bits.
@aphillips aphillips added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation editorial Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG labels Jul 9, 2024
@aphillips aphillips self-assigned this Jul 9, 2024
@aphillips aphillips added the resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon. label Nov 24, 2024
@aphillips
Copy link
Member Author

Outside the specification we don't mention the function registry DTD anywhere that I can find any longer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@aphillips aphillips

Labels
Action-Item Action item assigned by the WG documentation Improvements or additions to documentation editorial resolve-candidate This issue appears to have been answered or resolved, and may be closed soon.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@aphillips