We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Instead of having a single compact implementation that uses SignedFixedDecimal, we propose introducing two separate types:
compact
SignedFixedDecimal
UnsignedCompactDecimal
SignedCompactDecimal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
UnsignedFixedDecimal
How do you envision the nesting?
Should it be:
Compact<Signed<Decimal>>
Signed<Compact<Decimal>>
Sorry, something went wrong.
younies
No branches or pull requests
Description
Instead of having a single
compact
implementation that usesSignedFixedDecimal
, we propose introducing two separate types:UnsignedCompactDecimal
SignedCompactDecimal
Benefits
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: