You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We really want O(1) steps per partition, since we want to make sure cascading can plan it fast, but still we don't understand why the law is failing. It could be our model of how cascading plans is off.
Here is a failure:
[info] - When we break at forks we have at most 2 + hashJoin steps *** FAILED ***
[info] TestFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
Reporter completed abruptly with an exception after receiving event: TestFailed(Ordinal(0, 1187),TestFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
Message: 4 was not less than or equal to 3 optimized: WithDescriptionTypedPipe(TrappedPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(HashCoGroup(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(CoGroupedPipe(MapGroup(Pair(IdentityReduce(scala.math.Ordering$Int$@7ab78f27,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(FlatMapValues(Mapped(HashCoGroup(SourcePipe(com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(source_0)),IdentityReduce(scala.math.Ordering$Int$@7ab78f27,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(MergedTypedPipe(FlatMapped(IterablePipe(List(0, 2147483647, 1544762017, 0, 624052887, 0, -287604905, 307396159, -610267734, -971337476, -875627901, 1, 2147483647, -1828436720, -2147483648, -1846923827, -1938708654, -1, 1, -1880693903, -123621097, -2147483648, 840086264, -1, 716705883, -2147483648, -1237321546, -2018664413, -471628389, -1327949610, 2147483647, 1470526490, -1650836342, 915790024, 1772020311, -615139303, -2114954200, -673076699, -601159290, 183995577, 1194220429, -1, 2056294449, -560847744, 0, 0, -2147483648, 1843138917, -2056707332, 324239878, 2038838732, 1278259345, 1120086645, 2147483647, 1904161096, 1, 0, 0, -2147483648, -1165218113, 209432443, 0, 1947467572, 1, 2147483647, 1242019707, 2147483647, 2072354530, 1709997299, -2147483648, -1908641464, 1781430029, -1, 265802944, 2147483647, 1380531264, -433867587, 0, -17033375, -2147483648, -1443528651, 1, 745727866, -845251200, 1, -1490936578, -1184499549, 0, 1672666737)),<function1>),FlatMapped(IterablePipe(List(1, -51928547, 1, -302353733, -181736864, -2147483648, -571666277, -1, -675270052, 36854174, 1847828467, -2147483648, -2147483648, 237525651, 1, 178499055, -2147483648, 338940843, -1054752338, -1, 829014631, 0, 1830694228, 1364013977, 0, -1, -1455941074, -85033653, -2147483648, -1210275416, -1937417356, 0, 867753776, 0, -1685381654, 70745480, -1783259469, -1376740730, 0, 1451049565, 1009239461, -2147483648, -1, -1, 773067303)),<function1>)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),<function3>),<function1>),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),IdentityReduce(scala.math.Ordering$Int$@7ab78f27,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(SourcePipe(com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(source_0)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),<function3>),<function2>)),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),IdentityReduce(com.twitter.scalding.typed.TypedPipe$CrossPipe$$anon$2@c0d067cd,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(SourcePipe(com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(dmscynvQ1el)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),<function3>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),<function1>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(bvvG7hu51rucqPmfeleytvwep89DofrhhuKscdxO1rcopty5avyu7Fzrnpuq),Single(com.twitter.scalding.TupleGetter$IntGetter$@188ea6ee)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[info] - When we break at forks we have at most 2 + hashJoin steps
Reporter completed abruptly with an exception after receiving event: TestFailed(Ordinal(0, 1185),TestFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
Message: 4 was not less than or equal to 2
Location: (WritePartitionerTest.scala:102)
Occurred when passed generated values (
arg0 = WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(CrossPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(CrossPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(ForceToDisk(EmptyTypedPipe),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Filter(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Fork(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Filter(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Fork(EmptyTypedPipe),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),org.scalacheck.GenArities$$Lambda$441/597763888@64c4c3bd),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),org.scalacheck.GenArities$$Lambda$441/597763888@36a7692b),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(FlatMapped(IterablePipe(List(2147483647, -2147483648, -1945538304, -2147483648, -2147483648, -1369151060, -1913477688)),org.scalacheck.GenArities$$Lambda$441/597763888@27dabd65),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))
We really want O(1) steps per partition, since we want to make sure cascading can plan it fast, but still we don't understand why the law is failing. It could be our model of how cascading plans is off.
Here is a failure:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: