Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WritePartitioner step count law fails sometimes #1817

Open
johnynek opened this issue Feb 20, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

WritePartitioner step count law fails sometimes #1817

johnynek opened this issue Feb 20, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@johnynek
Copy link
Collaborator

We really want O(1) steps per partition, since we want to make sure cascading can plan it fast, but still we don't understand why the law is failing. It could be our model of how cascading plans is off.

Here is a failure:

[info] - When we break at forks we have at most 2 + hashJoin steps *** FAILED ***
[info]   TestFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
Reporter completed abruptly with an exception after receiving event: TestFailed(Ordinal(0, 1187),TestFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
  Message: 4 was not less than or equal to 3 optimized: WithDescriptionTypedPipe(TrappedPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(HashCoGroup(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(CoGroupedPipe(MapGroup(Pair(IdentityReduce(scala.math.Ordering$Int$@7ab78f27,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(FlatMapValues(Mapped(HashCoGroup(SourcePipe(com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(source_0)),IdentityReduce(scala.math.Ordering$Int$@7ab78f27,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(MergedTypedPipe(FlatMapped(IterablePipe(List(0, 2147483647, 1544762017, 0, 624052887, 0, -287604905, 307396159, -610267734, -971337476, -875627901, 1, 2147483647, -1828436720, -2147483648, -1846923827, -1938708654, -1, 1, -1880693903, -123621097, -2147483648, 840086264, -1, 716705883, -2147483648, -1237321546, -2018664413, -471628389, -1327949610, 2147483647, 1470526490, -1650836342, 915790024, 1772020311, -615139303, -2114954200, -673076699, -601159290, 183995577, 1194220429, -1, 2056294449, -560847744, 0, 0, -2147483648, 1843138917, -2056707332, 324239878, 2038838732, 1278259345, 1120086645, 2147483647, 1904161096, 1, 0, 0, -2147483648, -1165218113, 209432443, 0, 1947467572, 1, 2147483647, 1242019707, 2147483647, 2072354530, 1709997299, -2147483648, -1908641464, 1781430029, -1, 265802944, 2147483647, 1380531264, -433867587, 0, -17033375, -2147483648, -1443528651, 1, 745727866, -845251200, 1, -1490936578, -1184499549, 0, 1672666737)),<function1>),FlatMapped(IterablePipe(List(1, -51928547, 1, -302353733, -181736864, -2147483648, -571666277, -1, -675270052, 36854174, 1847828467, -2147483648, -2147483648, 237525651, 1, 178499055, -2147483648, 338940843, -1054752338, -1, 829014631, 0, 1830694228, 1364013977, 0, -1, -1455941074, -85033653, -2147483648, -1210275416, -1937417356, 0, 867753776, 0, -1685381654, 70745480, -1783259469, -1376740730, 0, 1451049565, 1009239461, -2147483648, -1, -1, 773067303)),<function1>)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),<function3>),<function1>),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),IdentityReduce(scala.math.Ordering$Int$@7ab78f27,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(SourcePipe(com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(source_0)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),<function3>),<function2>)),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),IdentityReduce(com.twitter.scalding.typed.TypedPipe$CrossPipe$$anon$2@c0d067cd,WithDescriptionTypedPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(SourcePipe(com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(dmscynvQ1el)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),None,List(),ReflexiveEquality()),<function3>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),<function1>),List((com.stripe.dagon.FunctionK$class.apply(FunctionK.scala:11),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),com.twitter.scalding.source.FixedTypedText(bvvG7hu51rucqPmfeleytvwep89DofrhhuKscdxO1rcopty5avyu7Fzrnpuq),Single(com.twitter.scalding.TupleGetter$IntGetter$@188ea6ee)),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R$class.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))
@johnynek
Copy link
Collaborator Author

annother failure:

[info] - When we break at forks we have at most 2 + hashJoin steps
Reporter completed abruptly with an exception after receiving event: TestFailed(Ordinal(0, 1185),TestFailedException was thrown during property evaluation.
  Message: 4 was not less than or equal to 2
  Location: (WritePartitionerTest.scala:102)
  Occurred when passed generated values (
    arg0 = WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(CrossPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(CrossPipe(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(ForceToDisk(EmptyTypedPipe),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Filter(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Fork(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Filter(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Fork(EmptyTypedPipe),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),org.scalacheck.GenArities$$Lambda$441/597763888@64c4c3bd),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),org.scalacheck.GenArities$$Lambda$441/597763888@36a7692b),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),WithDescriptionTypedPipe(Mapped(WithDescriptionTypedPipe(FlatMapped(IterablePipe(List(2147483647, -2147483648, -1945538304, -2147483648, -2147483648, -1369151060, -1913477688)),org.scalacheck.GenArities$$Lambda$441/597763888@27dabd65),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true))),<function1>),List((org.scalacheck.Gen$R.map(Gen.scala:237),true)))

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant