-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Link to search UI in advise manager PRs #1028
Comments
/sig user-experience |
/priority important-soon |
@goern: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/good-first-issue |
@goern: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@goern: The label(s) `/label good-first-issue
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Problem statement
I don't know what to make of the PR opened by Kebechet advise manager, I want more information about why it picked specific packages.
High-level Goals
Provide more information about advise results in pull requests opened by advise manager
Proposal description
Link to thoth-search UI in PRs opened by advise manager.
Alternatives
Include justification table in the PR (this would likely be very large)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: