i can work on this one too

This issue is marked as stale due to no activity within 30 days. If no further activity is detected within 7 days, it will be unassigned.

Automatically unassigned after 7 days of inactivity.

May I work on this one?

Yes you may.

Mostly wrapping things up, but there are some points I'd like clarification on.

The new bank's admin having the [email protected] breaks with the current pattern of the other two banks just having numbered emails ([email protected], [email protected], etc.). I want to double check: is that's something we want to do?

There are a number of places in seed.rb where the Faker library is used to generate names, addresses, contact information, etc. However, there are also several places where the library isn't used and hand-written values are used. Is there a preference between the two? Should I be reworking seed.rb to always use one of these two methods?

The current pattern is legacy, to be sure. I think having a reasonable connection between the login and the name of the bank works.

As for the other -- @dorner -- do your strong opinions around randomized test data extend to the seed?

When it comes to seeds I don't really care much, because it's just for manual testing. If anything I think you'll have a more educated opinion than me :)

(Nods) I don't see any need for rework vis-a-vis Faker vs hard-coded values. On a going forward basis, I would tend towards Faker rather than hard-coded, as better for demo purposes, but it's not a big deal.

Gotcha, thank you both for the clarification.