Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how to adjusting parameters to improve the assembly result #48

Open
linshengnan2020 opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

how to adjusting parameters to improve the assembly result #48

linshengnan2020 opened this issue Oct 21, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@linshengnan2020
Copy link

hi, I have run a 1G , diploid genome with 70~80% repetitive sequences genome . The coverage of my PacBio data is approximately 40 x. As a result the final assembly N50 is 82k . I would be interested how to adjust the parameters to improve the assembly result. Could you please give me some advises? Thank you very much!

@ruanjue
Copy link
Owner

ruanjue commented Oct 21, 2020

Try other assemblers first, if all give small N50, let us discuss it again.

@linshengnan2020
Copy link
Author

I have used several assemblers ,such as mecat2, flye, WTDBG2, smartdenovo and nextdenovo , the results of smartdenovo and nextdenovo were relatively good, the N50 is 82k and 157k.

@ruanjue
Copy link
Owner

ruanjue commented Oct 21, 2020

Have a look at smartdenovo.pl, have you chosen the zmo engine? The default is dmo, much faster, but gives reletively worse alignments.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants