Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prefix.dmo.lay.utg and contig.fasta #46

Open
pengbo233 opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

prefix.dmo.lay.utg and contig.fasta #46

pengbo233 opened this issue Jun 28, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@pengbo233
Copy link

Dear community,
The -c parameter is used to generate the consensus sequence,but it is too slow.
Can I use prefix.dmo.lay.utg as the final contig.fasta ?

Thank you.

@ruanjue
Copy link
Owner

ruanjue commented Jun 28, 2020

I am afraid not, the consensus step is highly required, also plus following polishing with other tools.

@pengbo233
Copy link
Author

[Wed Jun 24 01:15:19 2020] output 14374 independent unitigs
[Wed Jun 24 01:15:29 2020] Done
wtcns -t 60 prefix.dmo.lay > prefix.dmo.cns 2> prefix.dmo.cns.log
31M Jun 28 07:53 prefix.dmo.cns
23K Jun 24 01:15 work.sh.o2700188
3.5G Jun 24 01:15 prefix.dmo.lay.utg.dup
295M Jun 24 01:15 prefix.dmo.lay.lnk
3.8G Jun 24 01:15 prefix.dmo.lay.utg
9.9G Jun 24 01:15 prefix.dmo.lay.dup
44G Jun 24 01:15 prefix.dmo.lay
76M Jun 24 01:10 prefix.dmo.lay.5.dot
85M Jun 24 01:10 prefix.dmo.lay.4.dot
96M Jun 24 01:09 prefix.dmo.lay.3.dot
482M Jun 24 01:09 prefix.dmo.lay.2.dot
34M Jun 24 01:09 prefix.dmo.lay.contained_reads
5.2G Jun 24 01:09 prefix.dmo.lay.1.dot
1.7M Jun 24 01:06 work.sh.e2700188
94M Jun 23 23:25 prefix.dmo.obt
0 Jun 23 20:35 prefix.dmo.ovl.contained
89G Jun 23 20:35 prefix.dmo.ovl

The output of this program is very slow. How can I improve the speed ?

@pengbo233
Copy link
Author

I am afraid not, the consensus step is highly required, also plus following polishing with other tools.

The output of this program is very slow. How can I improve the speed ?
It costs 7 days finishing 90/14374, I am afraid it will cost 10000h,it is too long。

@pengbo233
Copy link
Author

I am afraid not, the consensus step is highly required, also plus following polishing with other tools.
Dear community,
How can I choose parameters of smartdenovo/wtcns to improve the speed ?
Thank you very much!

@ruanjue
Copy link
Owner

ruanjue commented Jun 30, 2020

Unusually slow. Could you send me the first 10 sections, each beginning with >. ruanjue.big (AT) qq.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants