-
Hi all! I'd like to know whether we know what is the false positive rate we are hitting in:
I have some ideas how to make that value lower, but I am not sure if this is worth extra cycles for optimizing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
romanz
Jan 8, 2022
Replies: 2 comments 7 replies
-
I see two ways of figuring it out:
Not sure if the latter is worth it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Great question!
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
Answer selected by
prusnak
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Great question!
IIRC (tested a few months back), there were no collisions in
txid
.I didn't test
funding
/spending
indices but they shouldn't have too much collisions:txid
rows - so the collision probability should be~1.4% = 700e6**2 / (2 * 2**64)
funding
outputs - so the collision probability should be~9.8% = 1.9e9**2 / (2 * 2**64)
spending
rows - so the collision probability should be~8.8% = 1.8e9**2 / (2 * 2**64)