Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Pedersen commitment in decider #171

Open
5 tasks
winderica opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks

Support Pedersen commitment in decider #171

winderica opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@winderica
Copy link
Contributor

It is observed in https://eprint.iacr.org/2024/1436 that, thanks to CP-SNARKs, we can use Pedersen commitment in the decider without blowing up the size of decider circuits.

I already have a working implementation, but the code is messy, contains unsafe workarounds, and relies on forks of arkworks. Below I list several tasks that need to be completed before getting it merged into Sonobe:

Also, CP-SNARKs may make it possible to support commitment schemes other than Pedersen and KZG in decider, although I don't have any concrete idea yet.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant