Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adopt "Census I" as an archived Project/SIG under this WG #89

Open
jeffmendoza opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Adopt "Census I" as an archived Project/SIG under this WG #89

jeffmendoza opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@jeffmendoza
Copy link
Member

I have an odd request. I'd like to merge an archived project
now called "census I" into this WG, keeping it archived.
The reason is that I think it's important to continue to make it available.

Years ago I led a project to measure criticality, now often called "Census I".
The report & supporting code are currently here:
https://github.com/coreinfrastructure/census
Interestingly enough, that report specifically noted the xz utility
as especially concerning. Given the effort recently to insert a backdoor
into xz, that seems prescient.

However, the coreinfrastructure (CII) project is no longer in existence,
and in the long term we want to remove projects from it.

I think it's important for the OpenSSF to include this repository so that
future work can easily refer to it.

Seem reasonable?

Please vote on this proposal below

@jeffmendoza
Copy link
Member Author

+1

2 similar comments
@Amir-Montazery
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@calebbrown
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor

Clarification: The original request was from me, @david-a-wheeler . My thanks to all!

@jeffmendoza
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @david-a-wheeler With approving votes and no objections, this is approved to nest under this WG! Please go ahead and open up a PR in the TAC repo using the template as described in the Project Lifecycle:

@david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor

Wonderful! Thanks for approving this admittedly odd request. I think it'll be good for everyone.

@david-a-wheeler
Copy link
Contributor

I've asked Bennett to start the process. I have hopes that we can retain forwarding links from its old location, but I guess we'll see.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants