You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This was originally proposed by Nikola Stikov (who I can't find on GitHub ?), but it might be worth considering changing the number of guests per call from 3 to 2.
The benefits would be that each guest would have a bit more time to discuss their work and field questions from the audience, and it would also be easier for the host to check-in with / test connections for each guest before the call. Also, thinking about #17, having two guests would make it easier for each call to align with a theme.
The downsides include that if a guest can't attend at the last minute, then we'd only have one speaker to fill a full 30 minutes !
I'm leaning towards dropping down to 2 guests per call, though I know @KirstieJane is not convinced. But I'd love to hear other thoughts for or against !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
well, if this is combined with some clear assurance from the speakers that
they are taking this seriously ...
The other possibility is to have a OS-SIG back up ready !
cheers
JB
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Elizabeth DuPre ***@***.***> wrote:
This was originally proposed by Nikola Stikov (who I can't find on GitHub
!), but it might be worth considering changing the number of guests per
call from 3 to 2.
The benefits would be that each guest would have a bit more time to
discuss their work and field questions from the audience, and it would also
be easier for the host to check-in with / test connections for each guest
before the call. Also, thinking about #17
<#17>, having two
guests would make it easier for each call to align with a theme.
The downsides include that if a guest can't attend at the last minute,
then we'd only have one speaker to fill a full 30 minutes !
I'm leaning towards dropping down to 2 guests per call, though I know
@KirstieJane <https://github.com/kirstiejane> is not convinced. But I'd
love to hear other thoughts for or against !
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#26>, or mute the
thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAQyaC1MZA_J6aJ-T4hEqGqgAmhAK24Jks5tXZVHgaJpZM4SPmEC>
.
This was originally proposed by Nikola Stikov (who I can't find on GitHub ?), but it might be worth considering changing the number of guests per call from 3 to 2.
The benefits would be that each guest would have a bit more time to discuss their work and field questions from the audience, and it would also be easier for the host to check-in with / test connections for each guest before the call. Also, thinking about #17, having two guests would make it easier for each call to align with a theme.
The downsides include that if a guest can't attend at the last minute, then we'd only have one speaker to fill a full 30 minutes !
I'm leaning towards dropping down to 2 guests per call, though I know @KirstieJane is not convinced. But I'd love to hear other thoughts for or against !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: