You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This estimation should give a reasonable reflection of variance due to stochastic fluctuations. The formula can be improved by error propagating parameter uncertainties (β, t0) if desired.
The function is closed form so it should be easy and efficient to shade in the ∓ region
Edit: Quick simulation to demonstrate what it looks like
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I took a simple SIR model to calculate the 1σ width for the infected using stochastic calculus in the mean field approximation for S.
The processes assumed are the following:
Infection of susceptible: (I + S → 2 I, rate r)
Death or Recovery of infected (I → ∅, rate ε)
The result is:
or in terms of mean field I(t) only:
This estimation should give a reasonable reflection of variance due to stochastic fluctuations. The formula can be improved by error propagating parameter uncertainties (β, t0) if desired.
The function is closed form so it should be easy and efficient to shade in the ∓ region
Edit: Quick simulation to demonstrate what it looks like
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions