You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
xref BEP 020 : The community is converging on a BIDS specification for eye-tracking data. MNE-Python has also supported eye-tracking data since v1.4 (May 2023).
Once BEP 020 is merged, actually implementing software to help researchers read/write BIDS compliant eye-tracking data is the natural next step.
Describe your solution
Since more folks are working with eyetracking data in MNE, I propose that MNE-BIDS is a good place to implement this support.
I imagine that only the new schema validator will be able to validate eye tracking BIDS data (assuming that the legacy validator that is written in JS will not be updated). So if #1302 is not merged soon, I'd also be willing to help bring that across the finish line.
How do folks feel about supporting I/O for eyetracking BIDS?
Describe possible alternatives
Don't support I/O for BIDS compliant eyetracking data, at least not yet.
Additional context
I will be applying for grant funding (USSRI) to request funding that would allow me to dedicate a portion of my time to do this.
If I am not granted the award, I will still be interested in this to the extent that my projects would benefit from it, but I may not be able to dedicate as much time to the effort.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the problem
xref BEP 020 : The community is converging on a BIDS specification for eye-tracking data. MNE-Python has also supported eye-tracking data since v1.4 (May 2023).
Once BEP 020 is merged, actually implementing software to help researchers read/write BIDS compliant eye-tracking data is the natural next step.
Describe your solution
Since more folks are working with eyetracking data in MNE, I propose that MNE-BIDS is a good place to implement this support.
I imagine that only the new schema validator will be able to validate eye tracking BIDS data (assuming that the legacy validator that is written in JS will not be updated). So if #1302 is not merged soon, I'd also be willing to help bring that across the finish line.
How do folks feel about supporting I/O for eyetracking BIDS?
Describe possible alternatives
Don't support I/O for BIDS compliant eyetracking data, at least not yet.
Additional context
I will be applying for grant funding (USSRI) to request funding that would allow me to dedicate a portion of my time to do this.
If I am not granted the award, I will still be interested in this to the extent that my projects would benefit from it, but I may not be able to dedicate as much time to the effort.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: