You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is sorely needed and the absence of this is making containers relying on order of values to be barely useful (one needs to pass around orphan instance implementations).
TODO:
Research: Prelude opaque types ordering among supported languages (for example: How is Ord Text in Haskell vs Rust vs Typescript vs Purescript, does the order match? if "b" > "a" in one language, it has to be the same in all others). How do we proceed if for example Rust and Haskell implement different ordering for Text?
Research: Plutus opaque types ordering.
Research: Specify how ordering is derived for transparent types. How does that impact Plutarc/PlutusTx backends? Can we rely on the ordering of the underlying PlutusData value representations?
Design and implement tests
I imagine an lb.json file that contains a List a where a is some orderable. The golden file would contain elements in correct order and the testsuite would read golden >> permutate >> order >> compare.
Otherwise, internal tests for each backend would also do property testing on a > b && b > c => a > c etc.
Implement Haskell, Purescript, Rust, Typescript, PlutusTx and Plutarch backends
Because of how the codegen framework works, theoretically this should 'just' require the LamVal spec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is sorely needed and the absence of this is making containers relying on order of values to be barely useful (one needs to pass around orphan instance implementations).
TODO:
lb.json
file that contains aList a
wherea
is some orderable. The golden file would contain elements in correct order and the testsuite wouldread golden >> permutate >> order >> compare
.a > b && b > c => a > c
etc.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: