Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gImageReader need a Wikipedia article #687

Open
efa opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

gImageReader need a Wikipedia article #687

efa opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@efa
Copy link

efa commented Oct 30, 2024

hi,
the application is good, cross platform and free. It need and deserves s Wikipedia article to get know.
As now I can link in Tesseract article but, have own article is a requirements to remain and not removed (notability).
To have its own Wiki article, need some external review on independent SW/tech web sites (not blog or personal web pages).
Can you provide some?

@manisandro
Copy link
Owner

Please feel free to go ahead and write one!

@efa
Copy link
Author

efa commented Oct 30, 2024

if we write a dedicated article, we must cite external sources such as websites with product reviews, blogs are not good.
Without citing external sources the article would probably be deleted for lack of notability. Do you have a list of sites with reviews?

@manisandro
Copy link
Owner

No specific list other than what a google search comes up with

@SantosSi
Copy link
Contributor

SantosSi commented Nov 11, 2024

What about a chapter in a web article about Tesseract from one of the most renowned German IT magazines c't: https://www.heise.de/tests/Toolbox-Texterkennung-mit-Tesseract-OCR-1674881.html#nav_gimagereader__2

@efa
Copy link
Author

efa commented Nov 11, 2024

that's good to document gImageReader notability to have a dedicated Wiki article.

In the mean time I added an external link to the Tesseract article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tesseract_%28software%29&diff=1255380612&oldid=1241722910

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants