You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am looking at the code, paper and Meta's demos and i have strong feeling that there is something wrong with the way infill is solved.
On all demos they cut the audio and then do actual infill keeping surroundings intact, while here we are use full output of the xt, which expects network to be perfectly trained to synthesize very same audio, which is clearly not expected from the model that is measured to do opposite.
It seems we need either to init y0 with noise + unmasked audio or merge results from solver on each step or run solver on specific segment only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey,
I am looking at the code, paper and Meta's demos and i have strong feeling that there is something wrong with the way infill is solved.
On all demos they cut the audio and then do actual infill keeping surroundings intact, while here we are use full output of the xt, which expects network to be perfectly trained to synthesize very same audio, which is clearly not expected from the model that is measured to do opposite.
It seems we need either to init y0 with noise + unmasked audio or merge results from solver on each step or run solver on specific segment only.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: