Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cover ClusterClass provisioning in E2E #1354

Open
salasberryfin opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1355
Open

Cover ClusterClass provisioning in E2E #1354

salasberryfin opened this issue Nov 5, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1355
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.

Comments

@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor

/kind feature

Describe the solution you'd like

As a developer I'd like to have ClusterClass provisioning covered in E2E tests.

Anything else you would like to add:

This is a follow up of #1351 (comment). There are templates for creating ClusterClass and Cluster from topology but this case needs to be added to the list of scenarios covered in E2E.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Nov 5, 2024
@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Nov 5, 2024
@salasberryfin salasberryfin linked a pull request Nov 5, 2024 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@salasberryfin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants