diff --git a/papers_discussed/ElasticWeightConsolidation.md b/papers_discussed/ElasticWeightConsolidation.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a1156db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/papers_discussed/ElasticWeightConsolidation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+### Title
+
+[Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks](https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00796)
+
+### tl;dr
+
+The objective of the work is to design a methodology which can learn multiple tasks in a sequential manner on the same set of model parameters without having access to the previous task dataset while learning a new task. The challenge involved in this work is to reduce the rapid drop in performance of previously learned tasks(called catastrophic forgetting) while training a new one.
+
+### Describe the method
+
+In case of deep neural networks, when we train a model on some task A, the model parameters adapt themselves to optimize the loss L_A(θ). But, when we try to train a second task B after training our first task A on the same model, the parameters adapt themselves according to the new loss objective L_B(θ) and therefore losing its performance on task A.
+
+To embed the neurobiological model of task-specific synaptic consolidation in neural networks, Kirkpatrick et al. has proposed an additional term L_pull(θ, θ^(∗)A) in the loss function L(θ) while training on task B, which ensures that important parameters stay close to their earlier values θ^(∗)A based on how important they are to the previously learned
+tasks, resembling plastic nature of the synapses in the brain. The idea is clearly demonstrated in the figure below.
+
+![img](https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/114/13/3521/F1.large.jpg?width=800&height=600&carousel=1)
+
+The importance of parameters w.r.t. the earlier task A is approximated as the diagonal of the Fisher information matrix F. The final loss function L that we minimize during training task B is:
+
+![img](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*tON3f3xLkaFswgOOzuUqng.png)
+
+where L_B(θ) is the loss for task B only, λ sets how important the old task is compared to the new one, i labels each parameter and F_i in this case is the second derivative of the loss near a minimum(in this case θ^(∗)A_i wrt each parameter θ_i). When we have to train other tasks (say a new task C), we need to keep the network parameters close to both the task A and B by adding two separate penalties for both the tasks.
+
+### Any further details
+
+Another method to measure the importance of paramters wrt the earlier trained tasks is discussed in the paper below.
+"Continual Learning Through Synaptic Intelligence" by Friedemann Zenke, Ben Poole, Surya Ganguli
+
+### My two cents
+
+I will add later.
\ No newline at end of file