Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility with Elasticsearch APM UI #1365

Closed
jozef-slezak opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Compatibility with Elasticsearch APM UI #1365

jozef-slezak opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@jozef-slezak
Copy link

jozef-slezak commented Feb 20, 2019

Requirement - what kind of business use case are you trying to solve?

Storing to Elastic Search backend in the way that Kibana APM UI can display spans.
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/apm/get-started/current/distributed-tracing.html

Problem - what in Jaeger blocks you from solving the requirement?

It is more like an improvement rather than a blocking issue... (that might lead to a synergy between Jaeger and ELK).

Proposal - what do you suggest to solve the problem or improve the existing situation?

Use the same/similar data model as https://github.com/elastic/apm-server when storing data to ELK.

Any open questions to address

@yurishkuro yurishkuro changed the title ElasticSearch APM UI Compatibility with Elasticsearch APM UI Feb 20, 2019
@yurishkuro yurishkuro added enhancement help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement area/storage storage/elasticsearch labels Feb 20, 2019
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

Better links:

Jaeger does not have anything that maps to E-APM's "transactions" (similar to "segments" in other APM solutions)

@pavolloffay
Copy link
Member

We don't have plans to support this at the moment. This could be done externally with a storage plugin #638

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

doesn't look like this is getting traction, closing

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added wontfix and removed enhancement help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement hacktoberfest labels Nov 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants