Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Episode Idea] - Today, where does Cilium shine for Kubernetes? #26

Open
Boes-man opened this issue Jun 24, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

[Episode Idea] - Today, where does Cilium shine for Kubernetes? #26

Boes-man opened this issue Jun 24, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Boes-man
Copy link

Boes-man commented Jun 24, 2021

I havent read/researched cilium enough yet. BPF and XDP seems to have opened a pandoras box of implementations options and have overlap with other capabilities (sec, observability, service mesh, etc.). Given Cilium today and being able to build a greenfields, money no object, kubernetes, no transaction can be lost type platform. Which parts of cilium can be used? CNI (as kube-proxy replacement?). Hubble (as observability)? Is my understanding correct, in that, Cilium CNI + Hubble brings much to the solution and really is enough/better in a CNI and operational support of the CNI (Hubble). If true, which other capabilities (sec, observability, service mesh, service discovery, sec, etc.) are best served somewhere else. Another way to ask the question is, why should I replace calico with cilium today? Not looking for a deep dive necessarily, but how do I justify switching to cilium. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant