You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand that better performance can be achieved by expanding under 128B, but since 8B cases are already being handled, why hasn't 64B been implemented? Especially when dealing with small sizes, won't the performance directly degrade to the base version?
Or did I miss something?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I understand that better performance can be achieved by expanding under 128B, but since 8B cases are already being handled, why hasn't 64B been implemented? Especially when dealing with small sizes, won't the performance directly degrade to the base version?
Or did I miss something?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: