You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Somebody has compared te python-zlib-ng bindings with the python-isal bindings for performance. ISA-L is the better compessor/decompressor but zlib-ng seems to be faster at performing adler32 and crc32 checksums. zlib-ng/zlib-ng#1478
Since checksum calculation is a significant part of compression/decompression this might be an interesting opportunity to further speed up ISA-L by looking at the zlib-ng implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rhpvorderman
changed the title
zlib-ng performs alder32 and crc32 checksums faster
zlib-ng performs adler32 and crc32 checksums faster
Jun 30, 2023
Somebody has compared te python-zlib-ng bindings with the python-isal bindings for performance. ISA-L is the better compessor/decompressor but zlib-ng seems to be faster at performing adler32 and crc32 checksums. zlib-ng/zlib-ng#1478
Since checksum calculation is a significant part of compression/decompression this might be an interesting opportunity to further speed up ISA-L by looking at the zlib-ng implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: