Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add ML operator support matrix, and ideally compares coverage with other major framework such as scikit-learn #30

Closed
zhenzhongxu opened this issue Mar 16, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@zhenzhongxu
Copy link

It'll be nice to have an operator support matrix similar to Ibis', with coverages compare to
scikit-learn

@deepyaman
Copy link
Collaborator

deepyaman commented Apr 16, 2024

I think #32 is sufficient for now. Will close this if sounds good to you, too.

It'll be nice to have an operator support matrix similar to Ibis', with coverages compare to
scikit-learn

Specifically, Ibis measures coverage of each of it's own backends automatically (i.e. not coverage of operations supported by individual backends, such as whether something you can do in Postgres can be done in raw Ibis). Measuring coverage against scikit-learn will need to be maintained somewhat manually.

@jitingxu1
Copy link
Collaborator

#32
#102

done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants