You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently all licenses allow commercial use. While in many cases that’s fine, there is a use case in non-commercial licenses, and it would be nice to have a few options listed.
One use case would be making source code available for individuals and researchers, but don’t allow commercial use by default. In some cases this might be combined with more permissive licensing on case/contract basis.
Having a non-commercial license is in many cases more free than “No license” situation.
I do support the motion inhere.
Is there any legal restriction if I just add it?
The fact that the GitHub does not list the BY-NC 4.0 does not mean I cannot add such a license right?
Currently all licenses allow commercial use. While in many cases that’s fine, there is a use case in non-commercial licenses, and it would be nice to have a few options listed.
One use case would be making source code available for individuals and researchers, but don’t allow commercial use by default. In some cases this might be combined with more permissive licensing on case/contract basis.
Having a non-commercial license is in many cases more free than “No license” situation.
Two potential options to add are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: