We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The European Union, Korea, Russia or Mexico have a specific intellectual property right protecting databases, separate from classical copyright.
It doesn't look like this right is considered in BEIPA, probably due to its US-centricity. It probably should be corrected.
To give a concrete example, an example of licensing leveraging this right is the Open Database License, which is a copyleft license. This licensing is what is used for OpenStreetMap, which is attracting more and more attention from big corporate players.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The agreement explicitly says "intellectual property", it does not single any particular type of intellectual property.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The European Union, Korea, Russia or Mexico have a specific intellectual property right protecting databases, separate from classical copyright.
It doesn't look like this right is considered in BEIPA, probably due to its US-centricity. It probably should be corrected.
To give a concrete example, an example of licensing leveraging this right is the Open Database License, which is a copyleft license. This licensing is what is used for OpenStreetMap, which is attracting more and more attention from big corporate players.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: