Note: contributing implies licensing those contributions under the terms of COPYING, which is an MIT-like license.
- Make sure you have a GitHub account
- Make sure there is no open issue on the topic
- Submit a new issue by choosing the kind of topic and fill out the template
Read the "Submitting changes" section of the nixpkgs manual. It explains how to write, test, and iterate on your change, and which branch to base your pull request against.
Below is a short excerpt of some points in there:
-
Format the commit messages in the following way:
(pkg-name | nixos/<module>): (from -> to | init at version | refactor | etc) (Motivation for change. Link to release notes. Additional information.)
For consistency, there should not be a period at the end of the commit message's summary line (the first line of the commit message).
Examples:
-
nginx: init at 2.0.1
-
firefox: 54.0.1 -> 55.0 https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/55.0/releasenotes/
-
nixos/hydra: add bazBaz option
Dual baz behavior is needed to do foo.
-
nixos/nginx: refactor config generation
The old config generation system used impure shell scripts and could break in specific circumstances (see #1234).
-
-
meta.description
should:- Be capitalized.
- Not start with the package name.
- Not have a period at the end.
-
meta.license
must be set and fit the upstream license.- If there is no upstream license,
meta.license
should default tolib.licenses.unfree
.
- If there is no upstream license,
-
meta.maintainers
must be set.
See the nixpkgs manual for more details on standard meta-attributes.
In addition to writing properly formatted commit messages, it's important to include relevant information so other developers can later understand why a change was made. While this information usually can be found by digging code, mailing list/Discourse archives, pull request discussions or upstream changes, it may require a lot of work.
Package version upgrades usually allow for simpler commit messages, including attribute name, old and new version, as well as a reference to the relevant release notes/changelog. Every once in a while a package upgrade requires more extensive changes, and that subsequently warrants a more verbose message.
We prefer not to use the "squash merge" feature in nixpkgs: in order to keep as much information as possible in the commit history, we expect pull requests to consist of self-contained commits as described above.
This means that, after addressing review comments and before the PR is merged, you will sometimes need to rewrite your branch's history and then force-push it with git push --force-with-lease
.
Useful commands to be comfortable with are git commit --amend
, git commit --fixup
and git rebase -i
(and don't forget that git lets you define aliases!).
From time to time, changes between branches must be rebased, for example, if the number of new rebuilds they would cause is too large for the target branch. When rebasing, care must be taken to include only the intended changes, otherwise many CODEOWNERS will be inadvertently requested for review. To achieve this, rebasing should not be performed directly on the target branch, but on the merge base between the current and target branch.
In the following example, we assume that the current branch, called feature
,
is based on master
, and we rebase it onto the merge base between
master
and staging
so that the PR can eventually be retargeted to
staging
without causing a mess. The example uses upstream
as the remote for NixOS/nixpkgs.git
while origin
is the remote you are pushing to.
# Rebase your commits onto the common merge base
git rebase --onto upstream/staging... upstream/master
# Force push your changes
git push origin feature --force-with-lease
The syntax upstream/staging...
is equivalent to upstream/staging...HEAD
and
stands for the merge base between upstream/staging
and HEAD
(hence between
upstream/staging
and upstream/master
).
Then change the base branch in the GitHub PR using the Edit button in the upper
right corner, and switch from master
to staging
. After the PR has been
retargeted it might be necessary to do a final rebase onto the target branch, to
resolve any outstanding merge conflicts.
# Rebase onto target branch
git rebase upstream/staging
# Review and fixup possible conflicts
git status
# Force push your changes
git push origin feature --force-with-lease
Follow these steps to backport a change into a release branch in compliance with the commit policy.
You can add a label such as backport release-22.11
to a PR, so that merging it will
automatically create a backport (via a GitHub Action).
This also works for PR's that have already been merged, and might take a couple of minutes to trigger.
You can also create the backport manually:
- Take note of the commits in which the change was introduced into
master
branch. - Check out the target release branch, e.g.
release-22.11
. Do not use a channel branch likenixos-22.11
ornixpkgs-22.11-darwin
. - Create a branch for your change, e.g.
git checkout -b backport
. - When the reason to backport is not obvious from the original commit message, use
git cherry-pick -xe <original commit>
and add a reason. Otherwise usegit cherry-pick -x <original commit>
. That's fine for minor version updates that only include security and bug fixes, commits that fixes an otherwise broken package or similar. Please also ensure the commits exists on the master branch; in the case of squashed or rebased merges, the commit hash will change and the new commits can be found in the merge message at the bottom of the master pull request. - Push to GitHub and open a backport pull request. Make sure to select the release branch (e.g.
release-22.11
) as the target branch of the pull request, and link to the pull request in which the original change was comitted tomaster
. The pull request title should be the commit title with the release version as prefix, e.g.[22.11]
. - When the backport pull request is merged and you have the necessary privileges you can also replace the label
9.needs: port to stable
with8.has: port to stable
on the original pull request. This way maintainers can keep track of missing backports easier.
Anything that does not cause user or downstream dependency regressions can be backported. This includes:
- New Packages / Modules
- Security / Patch updates
- Version updates which include new functionality (but no breaking changes)
- Services which require a client to be up-to-date regardless. (E.g.
spotify
,steam
, ordiscord
) - Security critical applications (E.g.
firefox
)
Documentation in nixpkgs is transitioning to a markdown-centric workflow. Release notes now require a translation step to convert from markdown to a compatible docbook document.
Steps for updating 23.05 Release notes:
- Edit
nixos/doc/manual/release-notes/rl-2305.section.md
with the desired changes - Run
./nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh
to rendernixos/doc/manual/from_md/release-notes/rl-2305.section.xml
- Include changes to
rl-2305.section.md
andrl-2305.section.xml
in the same commit.
See the nixpkgs manual for more details on how to Review contributions.