Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify: Do we really need shared_supplier_article_sync_limit? #89

Open
lentschi opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Clarify: Do we really need shared_supplier_article_sync_limit? #89

lentschi opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
specification required
Milestone
Post-merge

Comments

@lentschi
Copy link
Contributor

lentschi commented Aug 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

I think this might be obsolete after switching to the new sync, but I'm unsure why it had been introduced.

see change at https://github.com/foodcoops/foodsoft/pull/609/files
@lentschi lentschi added this to the Post-merge milestone Aug 2, 2024
@lentschi lentschi changed the title Clarify: Do we really need shared_supplier_article_sync_limit Clarify: Do we really need shared_supplier_article_sync_limit? Aug 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
specification required
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Post-merge
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lentschi