Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incremental xDS implementations need to support TTL #421

Open
alecholmez opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Incremental xDS implementations need to support TTL #421

alecholmez opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@alecholmez
Copy link
Contributor

Currently the incremental xDS code does not support the TTL resource definitions like SOTW does. After all base implementations are in I'll go back and port that logic over as well.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged "help wanted" or "no stalebot" or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label May 20, 2021
@alecholmez
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah we need to remove the stale label here

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label May 21, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed in the next 7 days unless it is tagged "help wanted" or "no stalebot" or other activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 20, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had activity in the last 37 days. If this issue is still valid, please ping a maintainer and ask them to label it as "help wanted" or "no stalebot". Thank you for your contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants